↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 18: Species Tree Estimation from Genome-Wide Data with guenomu.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Species Tree Estimation from Genome-Wide Data with guenomu.
Chapter number 18
Book title
Bioinformatics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6622-6_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6620-2, 978-1-4939-6622-6
Authors

Leonardo de Oliveira Martins, David Posada

Editors

Jonathan M. Keith

Abstract

The history of particular genes and that of the species that carry them can be different for a variety of reasons. In particular, gene trees and species trees can differ due to well-known evolutionary processes such as gene duplication and loss, lateral gene transfer, or incomplete lineage sorting. Species tree reconstruction methods have been developed to take this incongruence into account; these can be divided grossly into supertree and supermatrix approaches. Here we introduce a new Bayesian hierarchical model that we have recently developed and implemented in the program guenomu. The new model considers multiple sources of gene tree/species tree disagreement. Guenomu takes as input posterior distributions of unrooted gene tree topologies for multiple gene families, in order to estimate the posterior distribution of rooted species tree topologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
New Zealand 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 4 19%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,828,338
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,246
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,477
of 420,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#637
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.