↓ Skip to main content

Progress in Motor Control

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Progress in Motor Control'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Modularity for Motor Control and Motor Learning
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Synergies in Grasping
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Encoding Temporal Features of Skilled Movements—What, Whether and How?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Predictability and Robustness in the Manipulation of Dynamically Complex Objects
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Fifty Years of Physics of Living Systems
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Relationship Between Postural and Movement Stability
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Principles of Motor Recovery After Neurological Injury Based on a Motor Control Theory
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 What Do TMS-Evoked Motor Potentials Tell Us About Motor Learning?
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Motor Control of Human Spinal Cord Disconnected from the Brain and Under External Movement
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Anticipation in Object Manipulation: Behavioral and Neural Correlates
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Brain Plasticity and the Concept of Metaplasticity in Skilled Musicians
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 The Coordination Dynamics of Observational Learning: Relative Motion Direction and Relative Phase as Informational Content Linking Action-Perception to Action-Production
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Rethinking the Study of Volition for Clinical Use
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Motor Lateralization Provides a Foundation for Predicting and Treating Non-paretic Arm Motor Deficits in Stroke
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Control of Cycling Limb Movements: Aspects for Rehabilitation
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Impaired Voluntary Movement Control and Its Rehabilitation in Cerebral Palsy
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Can Motor Recovery in Stroke Be Improved by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation?
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Organizing and Reorganizing Coordination Patterns
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Computational Index to Describe Slacking During Robot Therapy
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Toward a Proprioceptive Neural Interface that Mimics Natural Cortical Activity
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Erratum to: Progress in Motor Control
Attention for Chapter 14: Motor Lateralization Provides a Foundation for Predicting and Treating Non-paretic Arm Motor Deficits in Stroke
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Motor Lateralization Provides a Foundation for Predicting and Treating Non-paretic Arm Motor Deficits in Stroke
Chapter number 14
Book title
Progress in Motor Control
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-947312-3, 978-3-31-947313-0
Authors

Robert L. Sainburg, Candice Maenza, Carolee Winstein, David Good, Sainburg, Robert L., Maenza, Candice, Winstein, Carolee, Good, David

Editors

Jozsef Laczko, Mark L. Latash

Abstract

Brain lateralization is a ubiquitous feature of neural organization across the vertebrate spectrum. We have developed a model of motor lateralization that attributes different motor control processes to each cerebral hemisphere. This bilateral hemispheric model of motor control has successfully predicted hemisphere-specific motor control and motor learning deficits in the ipsilesional, or non-paretic, arm of patients with unilateral stroke. We now show across large number and range of stroke patients that these motor performance deficits in the non-paretic arm of stroke patients vary with both the side of the lesion, as well as with the severity of contralesional impairment. This last point can be functionally devastating for patients with severe contralesional paresis because for these individuals, performance of upper extremity activities of daily living depends primarily and often exclusively on ipsilesional arm function. We present a pilot study focused on improving the speed and coordination of ipsilesional arm function in a convenience sample of three stroke patients with severe contralesional impairment. Over a three-week period, patients received a total of nine 1.5 h sessions of training that included intense practice of virtual reality and real-life tasks. Our results indicated substantial improvements in ipsilesional arm movement kinematics, functional performance, and that these improvements carried over to improve functional independence. In addition, the contralesional arm improved in our measure of contralesional impairment, which was likely due to improved participation in activities of daily living. We discuss of our findings for physical rehabilitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 20%
Neuroscience 16 14%
Engineering 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,831,210
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,228
of 5,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,032
of 424,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#107
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.