↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Participation : Third IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2011, Delft, The Netherlands, August 29 – September 1, 2011. Proceedings

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Electronic Participation : Third IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2011, Delft, The Netherlands, August 29 – September 1, 2011. Proceedings'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Understanding TwitterTM Use among Parliament Representatives: A Genre Analysis
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Left and Right in the Blogosphere: Ideological Differences in Online Campaigning
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Combining Social and Government Open Data for Participatory Decision-Making
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Extracting Semantic Knowledge from Twitter
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Argument Visualization for eParticipation: Towards a Research Agenda and Prototype Tool
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Evaluation of an Argument Visualisation Platform by Experts and Policy Makers
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 ArgVis: Structuring Political Deliberations Using Innovative Visualisation Technologies
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 eParticipation Research: A Longitudinal Overview
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Power and Participation in Digital Late Modernity: Towards a Network Logic
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Inform-Consult-Empower: A Three-Tiered Approach to eParticipation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Design Thinking and Participation: Lessons Learned from Three Case Studies
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Reference Framework for E-participation Projects
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Measure to Improve: A Study of eParticipation in Frontrunner Dutch Municipalities
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Direct Democracy Catalysed by Resident-to-Resident Online Deliberation
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Knowledge as Power on the Internet
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Revisiting the Conceptualisation of e-Campaigning: Putting Campaign Back in e-Campaigning Research
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 An Overview Assessment of ePetitioning Tools in the English Local Government
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Questão Pública: First Voting Advice Application in Latin America
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 iLeger: A Web Based Application for Participative Elections
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 One for All, All for One – Performing Citizen Driven Development of Public E-Services
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Talking about Public Service Processes
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Innovation and Evolution of Services: Role of Initiatives
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Citizen Engagement with Information Aggregation Markets
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Towards a Structured Online Consultation Tool
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 A Review of Opinion Mining Methods for Analyzing Citizens’ Contributions in Public Policy Debate
Attention for Chapter 1: Understanding TwitterTM Use among Parliament Representatives: A Genre Analysis
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Understanding TwitterTM Use among Parliament Representatives: A Genre Analysis
Chapter number 1
Book title
Electronic Participation
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_1
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-223332-6, 978-3-64-223333-3
Authors

Øystein Sæbø

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 255 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 14%
Researcher 26 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 5%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 41 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 71 26%
Social Sciences 68 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 42 16%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,005
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,923
of 180,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#229
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.