↓ Skip to main content

In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Asexual Embryogenesis.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Somatic Versus Zygotic Embryogenesis: Learning from Seeds.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Recent Advances on Genetic and Physiological Bases of In Vitro Somatic Embryo Formation.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Do Mitochondria Play a Central Role in Stress-Induced Somatic Embryogenesis?
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Dying with Style: Death Decision in Plant Embryogenesis.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Somatic Embryogenesis in Broad-Leaf Woody Plants: What We Can Learn from Proteomics
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Advances in Conifer Somatic Embryogenesis Since Year 2000.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Molecular Aspects of Conifer Zygotic and Somatic Embryo Development: A Review of Genome-Wide Approaches and Recent Insights.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Androgenesis in Solanaceae
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Bioreactors for Plant Embryogenesis and Beyond
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Somatic Embryogenesis and Genetic Modification of Vitis
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Somatic Embryogenesis in Peach-Palm (Bactris gasipaes) Using Different Explant Sources.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Somatic Embryogenesis: Still a Relevant Technique in Citrus Improvement
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Somatic Embryogenesis Induction and Plant Regeneration in Strawberry Tree ( Arbutus unedo L.)
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Somatic Embryogenesis in Olive ( Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sativa and var. sylvestris )
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Somatic Embryogenesis in Crocus sativus L.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration of Brachiaria brizantha
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Somatic Embryogenesis in Pinus spp.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Somatic Embryogenesis of Abies cephalonica Loud.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Somatic Embryogenesis in Horse Chestnut ( Aesculus hippocastanum L.)
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Somatic Embryogenesis in Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) Kuntze (Araucariaceae)
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Anther Culture in Eggplant ( Solanum melongena L.)
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Anther Culture in Pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.)
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Microspore Embryogenesis Through Anther Culture in Citrus clementina Hort. ex Tan.
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Detection of Epigenetic Modifications During Microspore Embryogenesis: Analysis of DNA Methylation Patterns Dynamics.
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 From Somatic Embryo to Synthetic Seed in Citrus spp. Through the Encapsulation Technology
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 From Stress to Embryos: Some of the Problems for Induction and Maturation of Somatic Embryos
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Cryotechniques for the Long-Term Conservation of Embryogenic Cultures from Woody Plants
Attention for Chapter 2: Somatic Versus Zygotic Embryogenesis: Learning from Seeds.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Somatic Versus Zygotic Embryogenesis: Learning from Seeds.
Chapter number 2
Book title
In Vitro Embryogenesis in Higher Plants
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3060-9, 978-1-4939-3061-6
Authors

Winkelmann, Traud, Traud Winkelmann

Abstract

Plant embryogenesis is a fascinating developmental program that is very successfully established in nature in seeds. In case of in vitro somatic embryogenesis this process is subjected to several limitations such as asynchronous differentiation and further development of somatic embryos, malformations and disturbed polarity, precocious germination, lack of maturity, early loss of embryogenic potential, and strong genotypic differences in the regeneration efficiency. Several studies have shown the similarity of somatic and zygotic embryos in terms of morphological, histological, biochemical, and physiological aspects. However, pronounced differences have also been reported and refer to much higher stress levels, less accumulation of storage compounds and a missing distinction of differentiation and germination by a quiescent phase in somatic embryos. Here, an overview on recent literature describing both embryogenesis pathways, comparing somatic and zygotic embryos and analyzing the role of the endosperm is presented. By taking zygotic embryos as the reference and learning from the situation in seeds, somatic embryogenesis can be improved and optimized in order to make use of the enormous potential this regeneration pathway offers for plant propagation and breeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,351,145
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,346
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,884
of 393,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#545
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.