↓ Skip to main content

Histamine and Histamine Receptors in Health and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Histamine and Histamine Receptors in Health and Disease'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Histamine H2 Receptor in Blood Cells: A Suitable Target for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Histamine and Histamine Receptors in Allergic Dermatitis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Structural Analysis of the Histamine H1 Receptor
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Role of the Histamine H4-Receptor in Bronchial Asthma
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Role of the Histamine H3 Receptor in the Central Nervous System
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Histamine Clearance Through Polyspecific Transporters in the Brain
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Histamine H1 Receptor Gene Expression and Drug Action of Antihistamines
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Regulation of the Cardiovascular System by Histamine
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Histamine Release from Mast Cells and Basophils
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Analytical Methods for the Quantification of Histamine and Histamine Metabolites
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 54 Histamine Food Poisoning.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 85 Allergy, Histamine and Antihistamines
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 113 Molecular Modelling Approaches for the Analysis of Histamine Receptors and Their Interaction with Ligands
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 124 Pharmacological Characterization of Human Histamine Receptors and Histamine Receptor Mutantsin the Sf9 Cell Expression System
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 125 Changes in Histidine Decarboxylase, Histamine N-Methyltransferase and Histamine Receptors in Neuropsychiatric Disorders
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 127 Histidine Decarboxylase Knockout Mice as a Model of the Pathophysiology of Tourette Syndrome and Related Conditions
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 130 Clinical Development of Histamine H4 Receptor Antagonists
Attention for Chapter 22: Analytical Methods for the Quantification of Histamine and Histamine Metabolites
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analytical Methods for the Quantification of Histamine and Histamine Metabolites
Chapter number 22
Book title
Histamine and Histamine Receptors in Health and Disease
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/164_2017_22
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-958192-7, 978-3-31-958194-1
Authors

Heike Bähre, Volkhard Kaever, Bähre, Heike, Kaever, Volkhard

Abstract

The endogenous metabolite histamine (HA) is synthesized in various mammalian cells but can also be ingested from exogenous sources. It is involved in a plethora of physiological and pathophysiological processes. So far, four different HA receptors (H1R-H4R) have been described and numerous HAR antagonists have been developed. Contemporary investigations regarding the various roles of HA and its main metabolites have been hampered by the lack of highly specific and sensitive analytic methods for all of these analytes. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the method of choice for identification and sensitive quantification of many low-molecular weight endogenous metabolites. In this chapter, different methodological aspects of HA quantification as well as recommendations for LC-MS/MS methods suitable for analysis of HA and its main metabolites are summarized.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,318,648
of 24,887,826 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#257
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,154
of 431,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,887,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.