↓ Skip to main content

Non-medical and illicit use of psychoactive drugs

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 421: Contribution of Impulsivity and Serotonin Receptor Neuroadaptations to the Development of an MDMA (‘Ecstasy’) Substance Use Disorder
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Contribution of Impulsivity and Serotonin Receptor Neuroadaptations to the Development of an MDMA (‘Ecstasy’) Substance Use Disorder
Chapter number 421
Book title
Non-medical and illicit use of psychoactive drugs
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/7854_2015_421
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-960014-7, 978-3-31-960016-1
Authors

Schenk, Susan, Aronsen, Dane, Susan Schenk, Dane Aronsen

Abstract

As is the case with other drugs of abuse, a proportion of ecstasy users develop symptoms consistent with a substance use disorder (SUD). In this paper, we propose that the pharmacology of MDMA, the primary psychoactive component of ecstasy tablets, changes markedly with repeated exposure and that neuroadaptations in dopamine and serotonin brain systems underlie the shift from MDMA use to MDMA misuse in susceptible subjects. Data from both the human and laboratory animal literature are synthesized to support the idea that (1) MDMA becomes a less efficacious serotonin releaser and a more efficacious dopamine releaser with the development of behaviour consistent with an SUD and (2) that upregulated serotonin receptor mechanisms contribute to the development of the MDMA SUD via dysregulated inhibitory control associated with the trait of impulsivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 14%
Psychology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,440,760
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#322
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,448
of 393,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#54
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.