↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Gut-Bone Signaling Axis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Gut Microbiota and Bone Health
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Gut Microbiota and Bone Health
Chapter number 4
Book title
Understanding the Gut-Bone Signaling Axis
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66653-2_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-966651-8, 978-3-31-966653-2
Authors

Darin Quach, Robert A. Britton, Quach, Darin, Britton, Robert A.

Abstract

The past decade has seen an explosion of research in the area of how the bacteria that inhabit the human body impact health and disease. One of the more surprising concepts to emerge from this work is the ability of the intestinal microbiota to impact virtually all systems in the body. Recently, the role of gut bacteria in bone health and disease has received more significant attention. In this chapter, we review what has been learned about how the gut microbiome impacts bone health and discuss possible mechanisms of how the gut-bone axis may be connected. We also discuss the use of therapeutic microbes in the modulation of bone health. Finally, we propose an emerging field of the gut-brain-bone axis, in which the gut drives bone physiology via regulation of key hormones that are originally synthesized in the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,212,720
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#317
of 5,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,528
of 331,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.