↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Gut-Bone Signaling Axis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Immunology of Gut-Bone Signaling
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Immunology of Gut-Bone Signaling
Chapter number 5
Book title
Understanding the Gut-Bone Signaling Axis
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66653-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-966651-8, 978-3-31-966653-2
Authors

Fraser L. Collins, Jonathan D. Schepper, Naiomy Deliz Rios-Arce, Michael D. Steury, Ho Jun Kang, Heather Mallin, Daniel Schoenherr, Glen Camfield, Saima Chishti, Laura R. McCabe, Narayanan Parameswaran

Abstract

In recent years a link between the gastrointestinal tract and bone health has started to gain significant attention. Dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota has been linked to the pathology of a number of diseases which are associated with bone loss. In addition modulation of the intestinal microbiota with probiotic bacteria has revealed to have both beneficial local and systemic effects. In the present chapter, we discuss the intestinal and bone immune systems, explore how intestinal disease affects the immune system, and examine how these pathologic changes could adversely impact bone health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 8 28%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,027,210
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#658
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,869
of 330,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.