RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Fascinating thread about the issues facing science journalism with regards to sensationalism, accuracy, and that much of the hype we complain about starts from the journal or university press release - not a hurried or unscrupulous journalist/editor. https
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Well, this is a fascinating thread, up and down. ...& I'm not surprised. Those press releases can be *awful.* https://t.co/kLq2WoL8ZB
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Maybe press released should be peer-reviewed too ! https://t.co/Qvs0lgTAgI
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @monicaMedHist: "Given the rising competition between universities for media impact, was it possible that at least some misreporting ori…
"Given the rising competition between universities for media impact, was it possible that at least some misreporting originated within academia? To what extent were scientists publishing hype – deliberately or inadvertently – in their own public relations
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @CTennie: Make sure you can live with what your press releases say. https://t.co/NEeO08EL0i
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Make sure you can live with what your press releases say. https://t.co/NEeO08EL0i
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @SamanthaZY: Very important finding to note, albeit not too surprising. I've tried to contact my institute's press release centre to dis…
This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and publicity for academic journals. I’d say it also starts with cues and hooks inserted in the original papers. https://t.co/rw3BrVliOt
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Thread https://t.co/UaSI5VXXbo
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @footesea: "behind many misleading news reports is a misleading press release, normally part-written, or at least approved, by the scien…
"behind many misleading news reports is a misleading press release, normally part-written, or at least approved, by the scientists themselves" #scicomm #broaderimpacts https://t.co/3zTplDgbK6
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…