@siminevazire Not sure if this helps but the work on spin in press releases and news coverage @chrisdc77 has worked on seems relevant? 1) https://t.co/ATrhp02blB 2) https://t.co/XgNBUIiL21
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @NoahHaber IMO the University Press Office Bullshit Situation is one of the biggest issues in scicomm. When news stories…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @NoahHaber IMO the University Press Office Bullshit Situation is one of the biggest issues in scicomm. When news stories…
100% this. I’m constantly hearing when I interview academics that they really want to highlight the nuance / uncertainty of the findings but that was excluded from the official press release.
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @NoahHaber IMO the University Press Office Bullshit Situation is one of the biggest issues in scicomm. When news stories…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @NoahHaber IMO the University Press Office Bullshit Situation is one of the biggest issues in scicomm. When news stories…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: @NoahHaber IMO the University Press Office Bullshit Situation is one of the biggest issues in scicomm. When news stories…
RT @aleszubajak: @tarahaelle @justsaysinmice ICMYI: Here’s a 2014 BMJ study on exaggerated claims in press releases making their way (unsur…
So we can basically assume that news agencies are harmful to your health? https://t.co/asAGixKfaQ
RT @INNCOorg: Who’da thunk it? Five years later and it’s far far worse. https://t.co/RzqZVeap2K
Is this part of the induction process at nzherald perhaps?
RT @VeipumLifum: This was UK’14—Just imagine how US’19 would look like! Where heads of major US Health org appointed by the president!—FIRS…
This was UK’14—Just imagine how US’19 would look like! Where heads of major US Health org appointed by the president!—FIRST POLITICIANS then Health if it fits? No wonder Robert & Jerome act like they do @CDCDirector @Surgeon_General https://t.co/T
RT @INNCOorg: Who’da thunk it? Five years later and it’s far far worse. https://t.co/RzqZVeap2K
RT @INNCOorg: Who’da thunk it? Five years later and it’s far far worse. https://t.co/RzqZVeap2K
RT @aleszubajak: @tarahaelle @justsaysinmice ICMYI: Here’s a 2014 BMJ study on exaggerated claims in press releases making their way (unsur…
RT @INNCOorg: Who’da thunk it? Five years later and it’s far far worse. https://t.co/RzqZVeap2K
Who’da thunk it? Five years later and it’s far far worse.
RT @aleszubajak: @tarahaelle @justsaysinmice ICMYI: Here’s a 2014 BMJ study on exaggerated claims in press releases making their way (unsur…
Olha a dica do mestre sobre nossas discussões de ontem no IGNITE Makers!
@flavia_lab "The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study" https://t.co/HgmONK46eU
@mortenkj @IdaDonkin @GitteKJP @LouiseDrivsholm Jeg er ikke enig. Som der fremgår af denne BMJ-artikel, er der fejl i en hel del nyhedsartikler, som bygger på abstracts, der er pumpet for stort op: https://t.co/OnvgsijoN7 I min verden er der fire led, der
RT @aympontier: On blâme beaucoup les journalistes pour leur mauvaise représentation des actus santé, mais il semblerait qu'une partie de l…
RT @aympontier: On blâme beaucoup les journalistes pour leur mauvaise représentation des actus santé, mais il semblerait qu'une partie de l…
@SarahZielinski It seems difficult explain this if journalists are not using the press releases: "Exaggeration in news is strongly associated with exaggeration in press releases." - Sumner et al. 2014. https://t.co/2L2wlFra6O
RT @aympontier: On blâme beaucoup les journalistes pour leur mauvaise représentation des actus santé, mais il semblerait qu'une partie de l…
RT @aympontier: On blâme beaucoup les journalistes pour leur mauvaise représentation des actus santé, mais il semblerait qu'une partie de l…
RT @aympontier: On blâme beaucoup les journalistes pour leur mauvaise représentation des actus santé, mais il semblerait qu'une partie de l…
RT @aympontier: On blâme beaucoup les journalistes pour leur mauvaise représentation des actus santé, mais il semblerait qu'une partie de l…
On blâme beaucoup les journalistes pour leur mauvaise représentation des actus santé, mais il semblerait qu'une partie de la faute repose sur les universités voire les chercheurs eux-mêmes, qui exagèrent leurs résultats dans le communiqué de presse pour ga
RT @sociosauvage: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observatio…
RT @sociosauvage: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observatio…
Les journalistes écrivent des exagérations quand ils reprennent les résultats d'études scientifiques, mais c'est la faute des universitaires qui écrivent des exagérations dans leurs communiqués de presse.
RT @sociosauvage: Vu comment la tribune NoFakeScience a agité twitter il y a quelques semaines, je suis un peu étonné que cet article n'ait…
RT @sociosauvage: Vu comment la tribune NoFakeScience a agité twitter il y a quelques semaines, je suis un peu étonné que cet article n'ait…
RT @sociosauvage: Vu comment la tribune NoFakeScience a agité twitter il y a quelques semaines, je suis un peu étonné que cet article n'ait…
RT @sociosauvage: Vu comment la tribune NoFakeScience a agité twitter il y a quelques semaines, je suis un peu étonné que cet article n'ait…
RT @sociosauvage: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observatio…
RT @sociosauvage: Vu comment la tribune NoFakeScience a agité twitter il y a quelques semaines, je suis un peu étonné que cet article n'ait…
Vu comment la tribune NoFakeScience a agité twitter il y a quelques semaines, je suis un peu étonné que cet article n'ait provoqué aucune réaction (0 like/RT/reply) : https://t.co/o2dLO3jkDk
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Petroc Sumner and al. https://t.co/9pvtqTZkjt https://t.co/WEBccnz3kW
22. When health news is oversold, which it often is (see e.g. https://t.co/HFNO041SLX), the error typically arises in a press release rather than subsequently: https://t.co/rnoKEdXDlt
@VictimOfMaths Time perhaps for an update of this @bmj_company article which I frequently use for teaching https://t.co/HK5WEBeEbS
RT @elisa_kn: Check the @bmj_latest study @niallfirth referenced in his talk @Wcsj2019Eu, which found 40% of press releases about health re…
RT @niallfirth: not to exonerate all journalists from hype blame you know, but... you know https://t.co/EJIFAfOES9
not to exonerate all journalists from hype blame you know, but... you know
RT @elisa_kn: Check the @bmj_latest study @niallfirth referenced in his talk @Wcsj2019Eu, which found 40% of press releases about health re…
RT @tommoberly: Lots of mentions at #wcsj2019 for this 2014 BMJ paper on how exaggeration in academic press releases leads to hype in media…
Lots of mentions at #wcsj2019 for this 2014 BMJ paper on how exaggeration in academic press releases leads to hype in media coverage: "Exaggeration in news is strongly associated with exaggeration in press releases," the paper concludes. https://t.co/mgkJQ
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @profhrs: However, Sumner and co (2014) examined 462 press releases issued by all UK Universities in 2011 and found Exaggeration in news…
However, Sumner and co (2014) examined 462 press releases issued by all UK Universities in 2011 and found Exaggeration in news was strongly associated with exaggeration in the original press releases. https://t.co/cCZXgEhViz
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @annameierPS: This thread should be essential reading for all academics who see, or want to see, their work written up in non-academic o…
RT @chrisdc77: But there was one major hurdle with getting them on board. Our BMJ paper, which by now was storming across the media and soc…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @apalet: ¿Lo sospechaban desde un principio? No creo. "Most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the press releases issued…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
This thread should be essential reading for all academics who see, or want to see, their work written up in non-academic outlets. (P.S. Current scientist, former journalism student, still peeved about quote-checking requests from a decade ago.)
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
¿Lo sospechaban desde un principio? No creo. "Most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the press releases issued by universities."
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: But there was one major hurdle with getting them on board. Our BMJ paper, which by now was storming across the media and soc…
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @agholdier: Excellent thread on biased reporting re: science research and how everyone - including labs/uni's/scientists - is responsibl…
because communicating science to the public should be a serious matter (and not just an we-want-audience thing). also, their most recent paper shows that you can reach the audience without being exaggerated & inaccurate. #SciComm #research #metaresear
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
Excellent thread on biased reporting re: science research and how everyone - including labs/uni's/scientists - is responsible. I love the 'what this study does NOT show' section idea + the perennially good advice to 'get over yourself'! Thanks @Phil4Sust
RT briandavidearp: RT chrisdc77: But there was one major hurdle with getting them on board. Our BMJ paper, which by now was storming across the media and social media, pissed a lot of them off. Big time. Here's the paper as a refresher: https://t.co/Yw5xK2
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: But there was one major hurdle with getting them on board. Our BMJ paper, which by now was storming across the media and soc…
RT briandavidearp: RT chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health-related science news is already in the press releases issued by universities https://t.co/KTjtddiY
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
For those concerned with #climate hype in the news, an excellent, excellent thread.
RT @carlzimmer: @GallioLab @kylejasmin Two responses: 1) Fact-checking, done right, will prevent exactly that. 2) Press releases from unive…
@pcorrea78 @mariamonic91 The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study https://t.co/5NIWPWGdNT
RT @chrisdc77: But there was one major hurdle with getting them on board. Our BMJ paper, which by now was storming across the media and soc…
But there was one major hurdle with getting them on board. Our BMJ paper, which by now was storming across the media and social media, pissed a lot of them off. Big time. Here's the paper as a refresher: https://t.co/iYxj2G0Dpg /40
To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health-related science news is already in the press releases issued by universities https://t.co/ioJ7KI7SK6
RT @chrisdc77: @James_0Sullivan @hannahdev Hi James 1. https://t.co/iYxj2G0Dpg -most hype in sciences news is already in the press release…
RT @chrisdc77: @James_0Sullivan @hannahdev Hi James 1. https://t.co/iYxj2G0Dpg -most hype in sciences news is already in the press release…