↓ Skip to main content

Computational Methods for GPCR Drug Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computational Methods for GPCR Drug Discovery'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Current and Future Challenges in GPCR Drug Discovery
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Characterization of Ligand Binding to GPCRs Through Computational Methods
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Breakthrough in GPCR Crystallography and Its Impact on Computer-Aided Drug Design
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What’s In a Residue Number?
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 GPCR Homology Model Generation for Lead Optimization
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 GPCRs: What Can We Learn from Molecular Dynamics Simulations?
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Methods of Exploring Protein–Ligand Interactions to Guide Medicinal Chemistry Efforts
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Exploring GPCR-Ligand Interactions with the Fragment Molecular Orbital (FMO) Method
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Molecular Basis of Ligand Dissociation from G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Predicting Residence Time
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Methodologies for the Examination of Water in GPCRs
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Methods for Virtual Screening of GPCR Targets: Approaches and Challenges
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Approaches for Differentiation and Interconverting GPCR Agonists and Antagonists
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Opportunities and Challenges in the Discovery of Allosteric Modulators of GPCRs
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Challenges and Opportunities in Drug Discovery of Biased Ligands
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Synergistic Use of GPCR Modeling and SDM Experiments to Understand Ligand Binding
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Computational Support of Medicinal Chemistry in Industrial Settings
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Investigating Small-Molecule Ligand Binding to G Protein-Coupled Receptors with Biased or Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Ligand-Based Methods in GPCR Computer-Aided Drug Design
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Computational Methods Used in Hit-to-Lead and Lead Optimization Stages of Structure-Based Drug Discovery
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Cheminformatics in the Service of GPCR Drug Discovery
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Modeling and Deorphanization of Orphan GPCRs
Attention for Chapter 4: A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What’s In a Residue Number?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What’s In a Residue Number?
Chapter number 4
Book title
Computational Methods for GPCR Drug Discovery
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7465-8_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7464-1, 978-1-4939-7465-8
Authors

Márton Vass, Albert J. Kooistra, Stefan Verhoeven, David Gloriam, Iwan J. P. de Esch, Chris de Graaf

Abstract

The recent surge of crystal structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), as well as comprehensive collections of sequence, structural, ligand bioactivity, and mutation data, has enabled the development of integrated chemogenomics workflows for this important target family. This chapter will focus on cross-family and cross-class studies of GPCRs that have pinpointed the need for, and the implementation of, a generic numbering scheme for referring to specific structural elements of GPCRs. Sequence- and structure-based numbering schemes for different receptor classes will be introduced and the remaining caveats will be discussed. The use of these numbering schemes has facilitated many chemogenomics studies such as consensus binding site definition, binding site comparison, ligand repurposing (e.g. for orphan receptors), sequence-based pharmacophore generation for homology modeling or virtual screening, and class-wide chemogenomics studies of GPCRs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,083,392
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,006
of 13,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,230
of 452,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#75
of 1,485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,817 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.