You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
GLUT Characterization Using Frog Xenopus laevis Oocytes
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Glucose Transport
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7507-5_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7506-8, 978-1-4939-7507-5
|
| Authors |
Wentong Long, Debbie O’Neill, Chris I. Cheeseman |
| Abstract |
Xenopus laevis oocytes are a useful heterologous expression system for expressing glucose transporters (GLUTs) and examining their functions. In this chapter, we provide a detailed protocol on oocyte extraction and preparation for GLUT9 protein expression. Furthermore, we describe the determination of GLUT9 overexpression level by biotinylation and Western blotting analysis. Finally, we also describe how GLUT9-expressing oocytes can be used to measure urate kinetics by radioisotopes as well as two-microelectrode voltage clamping techniques. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,578,649
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,962
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,510
of 442,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.