↓ Skip to main content

Mitophagy

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mitophagy'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Induction of PINK1/Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Use of Correlative Light-Electron Microscopy (CLEM) to Study PINK1/Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Monitoring Mitochondrial Changes by Alteration of the PINK1-Parkin Signaling in Drosophila
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Assessment of Mitophagy in iPS Cell-Derived Neurons
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Investigation of Yeast Mitophagy with Fluorescence Microscopy and Western Blotting
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 MitoPho8Δ60 Assay as a Tool to Quantitatively Measure Mitophagy Activity
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Mitophagy in Yeast: A Screen of Mitophagy-Deficient Mutants
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Flow Cytometer Monitoring of Bnip3- and Bnip3L/Nix-Dependent Mitophagy
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Exploring MicroRNAs on NIX-Dependent Mitophagy
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Monitoring of Atg5-Independent Mitophagy
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Monitoring of Paternal Mitochondrial Degradation in Caenorhabditis elegans
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Monitoring Mitophagy During Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Detection of Hypoxia-Induced and Iron Depletion-Induced Mitophagy in Mammalian Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Immunocytochemical Monitoring of PINK1/Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy in Cultured Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 38 Short Overview
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 39 Observation of Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy in Pancreatic β-Cells
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 40 Monitoring of Iron Depletion-Induced Mitophagy in Pathogenic Yeast
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 156 Dopaminergic Neuron-Specific Autophagy-Deficient Mice
Attention for Chapter 20: Immunocytochemical Monitoring of PINK1/Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy in Cultured Cells
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Immunocytochemical Monitoring of PINK1/Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy in Cultured Cells
Chapter number 20
Book title
Mitophagy
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/7651_2017_20
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7749-9, 978-1-4939-7750-5
Authors

Fujimaki, Motoki, Saiki, Shinji, Sasazawa, Yukiko, Ishikawa, Kei-Ichi, Imamichi, Yoko, Sumiyoshi, Katsuhiko, Hattori, Nobutaka, Motoki Fujimaki, Shinji Saiki, Yukiko Sasazawa, Kei-Ichi Ishikawa, Yoko Imamichi, Katsuhiko Sumiyoshi, Nobutaka Hattori

Abstract

Both PINK1 and parkin are the responsible genes (PARK6 and PARK2, respectively) for familial early-onset Parkinson's disease (PD). Several lines of evidences have suggested that mitochondrial dysfunction would be associated with PD pathogenesis. Lewy body, one of PD pathological hallmarks, contains alpha-synuclein, a familial PD (PARK1/4)-gene product, which is eliminated by macroautophagy, while PINK1 and parkin coordinately mediate mitophagy (hereafter called as PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy) reported firstly by Youle's group. The mitochondrial quality control system is specific for elimination of damaged mitochondria especially in the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential induced by treatment with mitochondrial uncoupler like CCCP or FCCP. In this chapter, we summarized immunocytochemical methods to monitor the PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy using cultured cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,145,544
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#698
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,220
of 309,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#12
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.