You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Expression and Targeting of Tumor Markers in Gelfoam® Histoculture: Potential Individualized Assays for Immuno-Oncology
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
3D Sponge-Matrix Histoculture
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7745-1_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7743-7, 978-1-4939-7745-1
|
| Authors |
Robert M. Hoffman, Fiorella Guadagni, Hoffman, Robert M., Guadagni, Fiorella |
| Abstract |
Tumor-specific antigens are important in the study of tumor biology, tumor diagnosis, and prognosis and as targets for tumor therapy. This chapter reviews patient colon, breast, and ovarian tumors in 3-dimensional Gelfoam® histoculture maintaining in vivo-like expression of the important tumor antigens, for example TAG-72 and CEA. We have also reviewed that fluorescent antibodies can target tumors in Gelfoam® histoculture, thereby providing an assay for individual patients for sensitivity to therapeutic antibodies which have become so important in immuno-oncology and other cancer therapies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 43% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,391
of 13,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,827
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.