RT @mccormick_ted: Irony is being called classist for bringing this up https://t.co/euo8rZu0G6
RT @mccormick_ted: Irony is being called classist for bringing this up https://t.co/euo8rZu0G6
Irony is being called classist for bringing this up https://t.co/euo8rZu0G6
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
@PaoloAPalma Also here isa link to the article above: https://t.co/Ob94DlFJeS
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
RT @natashajaques: Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "me…
Study of the effects of institutional prestige and gender in faculty hiring reveals gender bias against women in CS: "median placement for women graduating from the top 15% of [institutions] is 12 to 18% worse than for men from the same institutions" https
@jjponcevazquez @AleVelascoNYU Certainly not, but with faculty production being like this, who would ever leave their home institution in a top-10 to "go somewhere else?" Even Duke, which is a good program, is not Top 10. https://t.co/0CfQsgWIee https://t.
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
RT @WashburneAlex: Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allow…
Why did Fauci and Collins get the power to decide which science is "fringe" and which is futuristic? Why were they allowed to use the megaphone of federal agencies to suppress scientific views? Why are these people from so few places & schools? https:
@OffTargetEffect worth pointing out the process is fairly inequitable so you need to acct for diffs according to institutional “ranking”. I’d expect bio to be more equitable than Comp sci in the following graph but that’s just my intuition. From @aaronclau
@SandRaider25 @Paleowin Check out @aaronclauset's work on the subject. Here's an example https://t.co/l49uIlLzbG
@HER_storian @AHAhistorians Maybe this? https://t.co/Hv3Z2KyDVq
@niedakh @rkaminski85 W fizyce tak nie jest. Nie kojarzę nikogo ze znanych mi naukowców w USA, który były prof. na uczelni gdzie zrobił PhD. Krąg własnej adoracji jest oczywiście: https://t.co/ealYy9bn8N
@chrstn_e Hahahhaa https://t.co/BvEvlGP3T8
The referenced research https://t.co/yo7GFvi0ZB
RT @NickZautra85: "The top schools generate far more professors than even just slightly less prestigious schools. For example, in history,…
Whoa! Who knew that a system known for benefiting the most powerful and rich would be so hierarchical and benefit the most powerful and rich? https://t.co/f3DEX45h0W
@BMatB @seis_matters i think this was it? https://t.co/cFNwlR1LAJ
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
@razibkhan Tenured (even at U's with mid to low ranking) tend to come from the same 2 dozen or so elite schools. They need massive amounts of adjuncts and graduate instructors to ensure their privilege. After all, what Yalie wants to be stuck teaching Intr
RT @derek_schutt: 25% of Ph.D. granting institutions make of ~70% of the faculty hires. The authors conclude this is due to prestige of th…
This is why representation matters. This is why recruitment into PhD programs matter. https://t.co/LI7zbflKUp https://t.co/8iaJb8ZFUQ
RT @derek_schutt: 25% of Ph.D. granting institutions make of ~70% of the faculty hires. The authors conclude this is due to prestige of th…
RT @derek_schutt: 25% of Ph.D. granting institutions make of ~70% of the faculty hires. The authors conclude this is due to prestige of th…
The pedigree factor in faculty hiring (that’s how I see it and call it).
RT @derek_schutt: 25% of Ph.D. granting institutions make of ~70% of the faculty hires. The authors conclude this is due to prestige of th…
25% of Ph.D. granting institutions make of ~70% of the faculty hires. The authors conclude this is due to prestige of the Ph.D. granting institution, and not individual faculty ability. https://t.co/Dij0vYnx0U https://t.co/MEcGSHplRk
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @Enloro: @aaronclauset @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Original manuscript here: https://t.co/FFuejP9GF2
Likely not the only personnel sorting system assumed to be meritocratic while actually based on influence factors that are not measured directly.
RT @Enloro: @aaronclauset @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Original manuscript here: https://t.co/FFuejP9GF2
Yes, we all know this, because most of us went to these schools!
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @Enloro: @aaronclauset @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Original manuscript here: https://t.co/FFuejP9GF2
RT @Enloro: @aaronclauset @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Original manuscript here: https://t.co/FFuejP9GF2
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
@841io @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore You can find all those details and more in the original paper. tl;dr: postdoc rates were under 35% for CS, and lower still for History and Business, and about 70% of these faculty stay at
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
The really wild thing about that chart is that according to those arrows MIT really only seems to be hiring from two places: Stanford and Berkeley. The inequality goes all the way up.
All of us in academia should be alarmed at the big influence of status hierarchy in hiring faculty. This very interesting research shows how the structure of inequity reproduces itself.
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @braydenk: more evidence of the status hierarchy in faculty hiring
more evidence of the status hierarchy in faculty hiring
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @aaronclauset: @Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work o…
In shocking news…
@Chem_Diva @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Here's a Twitter thread we wrote about our work on the socioeconomic roots of faculty (paper under review, but available as a preprint): https://t.co/05Xg0dYVdW Our work on faculty hir
@aaronclauset @alliecmorgan @samfway @laberge_nick @arbesman @DanLarremore Original manuscript here: https://t.co/FFuejP9GF2
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
RT @JohnHolbein1: "We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality…
"We find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality." https://t.co/7xVGJrQw4e
@JoshSavala I think it's this one, by @aaronclauset @DanLarremore & @arbesman https://t.co/lQjQrIUmMT
@platanomics Just in case you missed it: https://t.co/0dchHKJ7N1
@keithschnak @ethanbdm @researchremora @soashworth @Nolan_Mc @ianRturner Here's a good paper from Aaron Clauset and others that may be of interest (he has a few on this subject) https://t.co/S0s2GqUP0Y