↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Care and Clinical Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 32: Pro-inflammatory Cytokines in Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Review.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pro-inflammatory Cytokines in Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Review.
Chapter number 32
Book title
Pulmonary Care and Clinical Medicine
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_32
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-965468-3, 978-3-31-965469-0
Authors

Miłkowska, Paulina, Popko, Katarzyna, Demkow, Urszula, Wolańczyk, Tomasz, Paulina Miłkowska, Katarzyna Popko, Urszula Demkow, Tomasz Wolańczyk

Abstract

Cytokines are a large group of small proteins which play a significant role in cell signaling and regulate a variety of processes in organisms, including proliferation and differentiation of many cells, mediation in defense reactions and regulation of hematopoiesis. Cytokines can be divided into those with pro- and those with anti-inflammatory properties. In the group of pro-inflammatory cytokines the most important are: IL-1 beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma. Pro-inflammatory cytokines might be involved in the pathophysiology of many psychiatric conditions in adults, but their role in children and adolescents is less clear. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the patterns of pro-inflammatory cytokines in children and adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Psychology 6 14%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,453,139
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,512
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,558
of 310,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#46
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.