↓ Skip to main content

Influenza and Respiratory Care

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 180: Alpha Wavelet Power as a Biomarker of Antidepressant Treatment Response in Bipolar Depression
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Alpha Wavelet Power as a Biomarker of Antidepressant Treatment Response in Bipolar Depression
Chapter number 180
Book title
Influenza and Respiratory Care
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_180
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-951711-7, 978-3-31-951712-4
Authors

Jernajczyk, Wojciech, Gosek, Paweł, Latka, Miroslaw, Kozlowska, Klaudia, Święcicki, Łukasz, West, Bruce J., Wojciech Jernajczyk, Paweł Gosek, Miroslaw Latka, Klaudia Kozlowska, Łukasz Święcicki, Bruce J. West

Abstract

There is mounting evidence of a link between the properties of electroencephalograms (EEGs) of depressive patients and the outcome of pharmacotherapy. The goal of this study was to develop an EEG biomarker of antidepressant treatment response which would require only a single EEG measurement. We recorded resting 21-channel EEG in 17 in-patients suffering from bipolar depression in eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions. The EEG measurement was performed at the end of a short washout period which followed previous unsuccessful pharmacotherapy. We calculated the normalized wavelet power of alpha rhythm using two referential montages and an average reference montage. The difference in the normalized alpha wavelet power between 10 responders and 7 non-responders was most strongly pronounced in link mastoid montage in the eyes-closed condition. In particular, in the occipital (O1, O2, Oz) channels the wavelet power of responders was up to 84 % higher than that of non-responders. Using a novel classification algorithm we were able to correctly predict the outcome of treatment with 90 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity. The proposed biomarker requires only a single EEG measurement and consequently is intrinsically different from biomarkers which exploit the changes in prefrontal EEG induced by pharmacotherapy over a given time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 19%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,540,642
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,323
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,934
of 308,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#50
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.