↓ Skip to main content

Protein Reviews

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 50: Dual Roles for Epithelial Splicing Regulatory Proteins 1 (ESRP1) and 2 (ESRP2) in Cancer Progression
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Dual Roles for Epithelial Splicing Regulatory Proteins 1 (ESRP1) and 2 (ESRP2) in Cancer Progression
Chapter number 50
Book title
Protein Reviews
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_50
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-103709-2, 978-9-81-103710-8
Authors

Hayakawa, Akira, Saitoh, Masao, Miyazawa, Keiji, Akira Hayakawa, Masao Saitoh, Keiji Miyazawa

Abstract

Epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1 (ESRP1) and 2 (ESRP2) are members of the hnRNP family of RNA binding proteins that regulate alternative splicing events associated with epithelial phenotypes. These proteins play crucial roles during organogenesis, including craniofacial and epidermal development as well as branching morphogenesis in the lungs and salivary glands. Recent reports have also addressed their roles during cancer progression. Expression of ESRP proteins is low in normal epithelium but upregulated in carcinoma in situ and advanced carcinomas. Intriguingly, they are downregulated in invasive fronts. The plastic nature of ESRP expression suggests dual roles for them in cancer progression. Consistently, it has been shown that ESRPs suppress motility and anchorage-independent growth of cancer cells while supporting cell survival by enhancing resistance to reactive oxygen species. Regulatory circuits that fine-tune ESRP gene expression have recently emerged. Here, we summarize recent findings on the molecular mechanisms by which ESRPs exert positive as well as negative effects on cancer progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,465,988
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,315
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,101
of 354,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#70
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.