↓ Skip to main content

Signaling change during a crisis: Refining conditions for the glass cliff

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Signaling change during a crisis: Refining conditions for the glass cliff
Published in
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.002
Authors

Clara Kulich, Fabio Lorenzi-Cioldi, Vincenzo Iacoviello, Klea Faniko, Michelle K. Ryan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Student > Master 31 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 32%
Business, Management and Accounting 38 25%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 6%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,892,008
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
#738
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,071
of 294,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.