↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila Models for Human Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Designs for Flies + of Mice and Men: Design Approaches to Drosophila melanogaster
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Designs for Flies + of Mice and Men: Design Approaches to Drosophila melanogaster
Chapter number 16
Book title
Drosophila Models for Human Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0529-0_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-130528-3, 978-9-81-130529-0
Authors

Julia Cassim, Frank Kolkman, Marcel Helmer, Cassim, Julia, Kolkman, Frank, Helmer, Marcel

Abstract

Designs for Flies is an award-winning design-led interdisciplinary project between KYOTO Design Lab (D-Lab), the Department of Applied Biology at the Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT), Japan. Within the framework of speculative design yet using an inclusive methodology, Frank Kolkman, a young Dutch designer, took Professor Masamitsu Yamaguchi's climbing assay experiment with Drosophila in his genetic mapping for CMT as the point of departure. Kolkman sought to address two questions raised during his initial research: "Could alternative strategies be used to generate interest from pharmaceutical companies for obscure, complicated or 'unmarketable' diseases in drug research?" and "Could transgenic Drosophila be used for the wildcard testing of drug compounds directly by patients at home in the search for a possible cure?" The chapter will describe its genesis, design process and the challenges and potential of interdisciplinary projects of this nature along with the impact of the resulting concept, which incorporated service, system, product and interaction design. It won the Services and Systems category of the Dutch Design Awards (DDW) in 2016, and Kolkman was named DDW's Young Designer of the Year in October 2017. It was followed by Of Flies, Mice and Men: drosophila and the interconnected landscape of genes, a Drosophila-related science communication project by Marcel Helmer, Kolkman's successor as D-Lab Design Associate for which the design brief was based on issues raised by the first project. This is also described to highlight the differing issues, design approaches and results of this science/design collaboration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Unspecified 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,405
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,752
of 444,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#155
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.