↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila Models for Human Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Alzheimer’s Disease Model System Using Drosophila
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Alzheimer’s Disease Model System Using Drosophila
Chapter number 3
Book title
Drosophila Models for Human Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0529-0_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-130528-3, 978-9-81-130529-0
Authors

Leo Tsuda, Young-Mi Lim, Tsuda, Leo, Lim, Young-Mi

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most epidemic neuronal dysfunctions among elderly people. It is accompanied by neuronal disorders along with learning and memory defects, as well as massive neurodegeneration phenotype. The presence of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and extracellular amyloid plaques, called senile plaques (SPs), and brain atrophy are typically observed in the brains of AD patients. It has been over 20 years since the discovery that small peptide, called beta-amyloid (Aβ), has pivotal role for the disease formation. Since then, a variety of drugs have been developed to cure AD; however, there is currently no effective drug for the disorder. This therapeutic void reflects lacks of ideal model system, which can evaluate the progression of AD in a short period. Recently, large numbers of AD model system have been established using Drosophila melanogaster by overproducing Aβ molecules in the brain. These systems successfully reflect some of the symptoms along with AD. In this review, we would like to point out "pros and cons" of Drosophila AD models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 27 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 25%
Neuroscience 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 30 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,299,622
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#535
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,767
of 444,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#17
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.