↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila Models for Human Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Model
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Model
Chapter number 6
Book title
Drosophila Models for Human Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0529-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-130528-3, 978-9-81-130529-0
Authors

Yumiko Azuma, Ikuko Mizuta, Takahiko Tokuda, Toshiki Mizuno, Azuma, Yumiko, Mizuta, Ikuko, Tokuda, Takahiko, Mizuno, Toshiki

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease that affects upper and lower motor neurons in the brain and the spinal cord. Due to the progressive neurodegeneration, ALS leads to paralysis and death caused by respiratory failure 2-5 years after the onset of symptoms. There is no effective cure available. Most ALS cases are sporadic, without family history, whereas 10% of the cases are familial. Identification of variants in more than 30 different loci has provided insight into the pathogenic molecular mechanisms mediating disease pathogenesis. Studies of a Drosophila melanogaster model for each of the ALS genes can contribute to uncovering pathophysiological mechanism of ALS and finding targets of the disease-modifying therapy. In this review, we focus on three ALS-causing genes: TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43), fused in sarcoma/translocated in liposarcoma (FUS/TLS), and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,221,991
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#517
of 5,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,384
of 444,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#16
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.