Major portion of published findings in psychological sciences have not been reproduced, new analysis shows: http://t.co/S07BIirx7m
The both sides of successful replication or failed replication. http://t.co/Xq3mfmbFHp
http://t.co/orwguhsWpg Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science: effect size reduces 50% and statistical significance 30%
A rigorous meta study of the psychology literature reveals most of it is unrepeatable bunk http://t.co/tmKQHmvss2 #psychology
Too bad: "incentives for...scientists prioritize novelty over replication" http://t.co/3zrYRDEb1l Not here, replicate for thesis or PSY332!
RT @szymekD: Long live science? 50% of psychology results failed in replication trial. http://t.co/sNaz6LJaL1 @sciencemagazine http://t.co/…
http://t.co/lH0xfrKLzv еще одно доказательство что психология - дичь.Извсех психологических исследований воспроизвести удалось только треть
RT @FrontiersIn: Titanic #psychology replication study in @sciencemagazine: "only 39% could be replicated unambiguously" http://t.co/KwHjIk…
RT @FrontiersIn: Titanic #psychology replication study in @sciencemagazine: "only 39% could be replicated unambiguously" http://t.co/KwHjIk…
RT @szymekD: Long live science? 50% of psychology results failed in replication trial. http://t.co/sNaz6LJaL1 @sciencemagazine http://t.co/…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science ;-) http://t.co/iKCZWIkwyI
Helft medisch onderzoek wrschnlk onwaar http://t.co/GbieH27sIM en psychologisch experiment houdt vaak niet stand http://t.co/0GcPc82rdP
RT @introspection: Estimating the #reproducibility of psychological science—39%… Wow, worse than I thought! http://t.co/J7wzPcOrDD http://t…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject :100 psych replications observe ..of originals http://t.co/m8QmrDRlBG http://t.co/Uv7vVPCeXz
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject :100 psych replications observe ..of originals http://t.co/Ach1yG3Jnf http://t.co/ugnpgPY7N0
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject :100 psych replications observe ..of originals http://t.co/QgzuNw1aAy http://t.co/BzKdbXnSK1
Un estudio logra replicar sólo el 36% de experimentos de Psicología de 3 revistas importantes. http://t.co/3ZA5bpxFd7 http://t.co/DJPt9C1iHI
Long live science? 50% of psychology results failed in replication trial. http://t.co/sNaz6LJaL1 @sciencemagazine http://t.co/mF0zc8eALL
RT @medevidenceblog: Replicability problems in psychological research: http://t.co/VQb4LRm28Z
RT @EdinUniNeuroImg: Published: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science @CyrilRPernet http://t.co/teq9tvFmlM
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Published: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science @CyrilRPernet http://t.co/teq9tvFmlM
Published: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science @CyrilRPernet http://t.co/wuNsygPLfi
Published: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science @CyrilRPernet http://t.co/G4LvECTszE
RT @ebrnetwork: Yet another reason for using systematic reviews http://t.co/0bD9YitLNi
Yet another reason for using systematic reviews http://t.co/0bD9YitLNi
RT @RasgoLatente: Y con este párrafo para enmarcar acaban el artículo. (Y nosotros la lectura del mismo). http://t.co/mUyjxZbZrN http://t.c…
RT @RasgoLatente: Y con este párrafo para enmarcar acaban el artículo. (Y nosotros la lectura del mismo). http://t.co/mUyjxZbZrN http://t.c…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/wIei4W0wTw #science #openscienceCollaboration
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @sarcastic_f: Conclusions of the Reproducibility Project paper http://t.co/XIESOoP07z http://t.co/ffuVyxkzNw
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @catherineols: I'm thrilled to have been part of the #ReproducibilityProject! Results at http://t.co/cpwIyuvWKz. With this knowledge, we…
"A single study almost never provides definitive resolution for or against an effect and its explanation." http://t.co/26BQKVhxfs #research
有名心理学雑誌で発表された論文100本(2008年)について、追試を行ったら結果が再現できたのは半分以下だった、という話。だから心理学の実験なんて駄目だ、ということには直結しないわけだが、興味深いし考えるべきところではある。 http://t.co/tC3B7DjAEr
@AmenTheLamp I was actually thinking of the original. http://t.co/Clf2sgJkgI
Psychological science circa 2015: http://t.co/qyFsTeqpHe Check it out in → @sciencemagazine #reproducibility O_o
RT @sarcastic_f: Conclusions of the Reproducibility Project paper http://t.co/XIESOoP07z http://t.co/ffuVyxkzNw
@Johnson37975725 Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/tr3Sr1TLx5
RT @sarcastic_f: Conclusions of the Reproducibility Project paper http://t.co/XIESOoP07z http://t.co/ffuVyxkzNw
RT @sarcastic_f: Conclusions of the Reproducibility Project paper http://t.co/XIESOoP07z http://t.co/ffuVyxkzNw
“97% of original studies had statistically significant results. 36% percent of replications did.” http://t.co/TEorOXSp2g
RT @thomasfuchs: Science, how does it work (tl;dr badly, because it's humans doing it) http://t.co/0dWO7pnvXl
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
最新出刊的期刊《科學》刊登一篇心理學家們集體合作重新驗證已發表成果的研究。發現在近一百篇該領域前三大權威期刊登出的論文中,能重現當初原始研究結論的只佔少數。當初結論聲稱有顯著差異者,再驗證時僅有36%能重現。http://t.co/QqKw9bZxX1
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Replicability problems in psychological research: http://t.co/VQb4LRm28Z
@brandy_renaud here you go http://t.co/K9DQrhIoch also, more surprising results are harder to replicate and so on
Sharing raw data, code and analysis should be mandatory for all the publications! http://t.co/fwBtxYvgVg
RT @kenanmalik: 'Findings reported in the top psychology journals should not be taken at face value': http://t.co/JSyGEg6Z0S http://t.co/Z…
Pleased this came out on my birthday - best present ever! Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/AL1AKtPiqO
RT @kenanmalik: 'Findings reported in the top psychology journals should not be taken at face value': http://t.co/JSyGEg6Z0S http://t.co/Z…
RT @kenanmalik: 'Findings reported in the top psychology journals should not be taken at face value': http://t.co/JSyGEg6Z0S http://t.co/Z…
RT @joe_pickrell: Looks like psychologists are in a not-too-bad spot on the ROC curves of science (http://t.co/fPsesCn2yK) http://t.co/9rAO…
@BXconference @R_Thaler #ThalerKahneman What do they make of the recent Science http://t.co/u5GK4KbJ31 and implications for nudge research?
RT @kenanmalik: 'Findings reported in the top psychology journals should not be taken at face value': http://t.co/JSyGEg6Z0S http://t.co/Z…
RT @kenanmalik: 'Findings reported in the top psychology journals should not be taken at face value': http://t.co/JSyGEg6Z0S http://t.co/Z…
RT @kenanmalik: 'Findings reported in the top psychology journals should not be taken at face value': http://t.co/JSyGEg6Z0S http://t.co/Z…
'Findings reported in the top psychology journals should not be taken at face value': http://t.co/JSyGEg6Z0S http://t.co/ZNdSnzIJVB
RT @CMKeithW: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science - @OSFramework - http://t.co/CSJJBsAKYT http://t.co/ZPC7c7mKeX
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/ljAwc720ln
Artikel in Science: Psychologische experimenten zijn meestal niet reproduceerbaar. http://t.co/GOhmmKxkIF
Estimación de la reproducibilidad de los estudios sobre la ciencia psicológica: sólo llegan a la mitad. La... http://t.co/eyJJ09UxYf
RT @Frangougroup: Estimating the (non)#reproducibility of #psychological #science http://t.co/jr5cQ38p4I
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Reproduction of results is key for the acceptance of scientific epistemology http://t.co/SDvZRrDFA3 @sciencemagazine
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Tema aparte que el estudio de replicación también añade información útil, claro. Véase aquí por ejemplo http://t.co/K9DQrhIoch
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological #science. TLDR: Publish or perish: unfortunately unreproducible. http://t.co/kVCZMMoNoR
Massive study attempting to reproduce 100 psychology studies. Only 1/2 were reproducible. @BiophysicalSoc http://t.co/G1MSJ4s07c
http://t.co/UxDxslTLW1 This is really disappointing. #research #psychology
@DocsVerdict @VGautron L'article de Science : http://t.co/ef0uejm3i6
RT @introspection: Estimating the #reproducibility of psychological science—39%… Wow, worse than I thought! http://t.co/J7wzPcOrDD http://t…
"As much as we might wish it to be otherwise, a single study almost never provides definitive resolution" http://t.co/ttNGtD2oE0
RT @alafuente: "A large portion of replications produced weaker evidence for the original findings [in psychological science]" http://t.co/…
RT @alafuente: "A large portion of replications produced weaker evidence for the original findings [in psychological science]" http://t.co/…
The Scientific method appears to be be not so! http://t.co/WHZiU8i3M4
Оччень любопытно! Первоисточник: http://t.co/ktqKQLp0cO http://t.co/iqiyawojQC
"A large portion of replications produced weaker evidence for the original findings [in psychological science]" http://t.co/y8BJg3E5Fg
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
"The claim that “we already know this” belies the uncertainty of scientific evidence" http://t.co/7W7rw1gWQw v/@OSFramework @oscbloggers
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @DiegoKuonen: +1 RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/iNIUBb2SZf http:/…
Maybe 1/3-1/2 replicability is the gold standard. http://t.co/fMHmNPTINb
RT @Frangougroup: Estimating the (non)#reproducibility of #psychological #science http://t.co/jr5cQ38p4I
RT @DiegoKuonen: #Science RT @inductivestep: Important caveat http://t.co/eRoyTPsAZG http://t.co/BSeUcRCGBK
Estimating the (non)#reproducibility of #psychological #science http://t.co/jr5cQ38p4I
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/Ozj0sVvFEZ
Bravo to the folks at @OSFramework for their #psychology research replication efforts. http://t.co/UbRMHGXkTn #Socialwork next?
興味深い。 人間は易きに流れる。 http://t.co/HBBGCqcwBA
@Jessie125_MFC I think you might find this interesting. I did. http://t.co/jOZextK7WQ
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI (kidding!): #ReproducibilityProject published (http://t.co/PQVfSN1W5h); data, code, materials, reports open (http://t…
RT @BrianNosek: ICYMI (kidding!): #ReproducibilityProject published (http://t.co/PQVfSN1W5h); data, code, materials, reports open (http://t…
Data on reproducibility proves what I've observed: bias in scientific evidence is widespread. http://t.co/KHsNswfATo http://t.co/Yek9Uf4kvN
RT @jssp_pr: 心理学の研究結果、6割以上が再現不可能 検証調査 写真1枚 国際ニュース:AFPBB News http://t.co/TewSAUomhO ※「検証調査」したScience掲載論文はこちら:http://t.co/eqTHTqWArd
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
About 60 of 100 published psychology studies were not replicated! http://t.co/DKF8UrG39W Experimental scientists of all fields, let's beware
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @jimgthornton: Psychology not very reproducible. But I bet medicine little better. Fascinating paper. http://t.co/umkPrBcu0S
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science: http://t.co/OdGRoVI0FQ