Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science - http://t.co/iKhnNYUrdk
RT @SteveStuWill: Psychology replication project: 39 of 100 papers replicated http://t.co/gnj8HDgPS1 Original Article: http://t.co/UdGvql3…
RT @nicolasperony: What is WRONG with science, and what is RIGHT with science, in one graph. http://t.co/2jCpXIh0c2 #openscience http://t.…
Wissenschafter replizieren 100 psycholog. Studien. Mehr als die Hälfte hält nicht Stand. http://t.co/gwMRKEviyE http://t.co/BA3Ys3cLkl
And here is the full article on reproducibility of scientific results from Science. http://t.co/ut5rS9tjah
RT @DiegoKuonen: #Psychology (of) #Reproduciability (lack of it) > http://t.co/eRoyTPsAZG #Statistics #NHST #Science HT @athulaherath http…
"47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size" Ruh-roh http://t.co/6A2sqNXelD
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @JelteWicherts: Whoomp there it is! Nail on the coffin of “psychology has no replication problem” http://t.co/GaleITLRcj http://t.co/iV4…
Intentan reproducir artículos importantes de psicología. El fracaso era de esperar. http://t.co/4aMtiwXxvZ
RT @russpoldrack: "Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both" htt…
RT @FulweilerLab: "Innovation points out paths that are possible; replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both"htt…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
"Cup one-third full" not making headlines as study finds majority of #psychology research results are unreproducable http://t.co/0WEEqaHk02
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
@naholyr Attend, je lis l'article et je te dis :p http://t.co/ZY5BhBZMOO
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Good read: http://t.co/OnNgE6HPsv @yolandagil @HelpfulTangent #ontosoft and @EarthCube related. #Reproducibilitymatters
"Innovation points out paths that are possible; replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both"http://t.co/OnNgE6HPsv
The importance of balance between innovation & replication in research, with incentives appropriately tuned http://t.co/m0LcTiffzW
RT @petsandus: @herzoghal "File drawer effect" quantified for psychology? http://t.co/5e58sd1T8n
#reproducibility of psychological science paper is packed full of wise words on what scientific research should be http://t.co/m0LcTiffzW
"Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely;progress relies on both." http://t.co/IwsM8VsbLW
>> Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/6bSgu5MXwg
And here's the study itself http://t.co/QKLO2t2A2w
#reproducibility of psychological science: results of 100 replications by 270 researchers Open Science Collaboration http://t.co/m0LcTiffzW
RT @h_okumura: 📄 Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/y1XnGgVdjI (最初のグラフは縦横の目盛を同じ(asp=1)にしたほうがいいのじゃないかな)
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @nicolasperony: What is WRONG with science, and what is RIGHT with science, in one graph. http://t.co/2jCpXIh0c2 #openscience http://t.…
Psych reproducibility ain't great: http://t.co/d2We0bdqei
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
📄 Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/y1XnGgVdjI (最初のグラフは縦横の目盛を同じ(asp=1)にしたほうがいいのじゃないかな)
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @KeelePsychology: #ReproducibilityProject (including Keele's @JimGrange):100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals ht…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @DermotLynott: #ReproducibilityProject findings are out in Science. Frankly, I now feel more optimistic about the future of psych http:/…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Estimating The [I]Reproducibility Of Psychological Science [FAIL] Reproducibility is a defining feature of... http://t.co/yL7ktjdoxE
@mkeulemans Heb ik gedaan, was kleine moeite, maar nu het artikel zelf nog: http://t.co/7c7h2reZu9 @arjanvandermeij
RT @m_thomae: "Our" paper is out: http://t.co/tTv4ZohSny #ReproducibilityProject
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @BrianNosek: #ReproducibilityProject http://t.co/P2decGM0h4 published in Science http://t.co/ROZYJjzeGF https://t.co/AVS5Z9als8
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
RT @DermotLynott: #ReproducibilityProject findings are out in Science. Frankly, I now feel more optimistic about the future of psych http:/…
RT @MarcusMunafo: Reproducibility Project published: http://t.co/u1EQ8LR0z0 ...coverage here: http://t.co/avznj2mttL and many other places!
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/kC6EJUUvwz
"Innovation [reveals] paths that are possible; replication [reveals] paths that are likely; progress relies on both." http://t.co/vd5USghRPz
RT @GustavNilsonne: RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @GustavNilsonne: RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://…
@sciencemagazine: Reproducility of science is sw poor. 1/3-1/2 of original findings cld be reproduced http://t.co/F2MtRj0lVP
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @afcp_01: Science の元論文 http://t.co/ZevBdqXkfQ 。"米国の主要査読学術誌" 掲載の論文での数字……ということは。あと他の学術領域はどんなもんなのかなあ。 / “心理学の研究結果、6割以上が再現不可能 検証調…” http://t…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science:http://t.co/rkpHu3bjWi http://t.co/ixaY278KPa
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @KeesJanSchilt: "Thirty-six percent of replications had significant results" http://t.co/m4W7CHjnKJ i.e. psychology fails as a science...
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. http://t.co/VeqcIlRK5J av Norton Identity Safe https://t.co/IRnosb1ejZ
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/xKWOisxAAy
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
How scientific is science? Test results need to be reproducible. Surprise -often they're not. http://t.co/iu2FBj1a85 http://t.co/4mK2HuMlpk
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @TimSmitsTim: Before chastising psy for failed replications in http://t.co/CN84LW124k Ionnidis on medicine: http://t.co/AtPs7mT3x2 http:…
@eparquiodelgado @mavadillo pues la verdad es que no: http://t.co/K9DQrhIoch "reproducibility was stronger in studies and journals...
"Thirty-six percent of replications had significant results" http://t.co/m4W7CHjnKJ i.e. psychology fails as a science...
RT @TimSmitsTim: Before chastising psy for failed replications in http://t.co/CN84LW124k Ionnidis on medicine: http://t.co/AtPs7mT3x2 http:…
RT @JelteWicherts: Whoomp there it is! Nail on the coffin of “psychology has no replication problem” http://t.co/GaleITLRcj http://t.co/iV4…
One of the biggest strikes against parapsychology and paranormal research cited by skeptics and cynics is the... http://t.co/kHGhjwimzl
Psychology reproducibility; repeating w cell biology would be fascinating but take so much more time and money. http://t.co/rjwu0b3kHj
More reasons to think that science needs replication: http://t.co/vMiIaEO0hZ
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science: http://t.co/nzzi3Xd84P
Science の元論文 http://t.co/ZevBdqXkfQ 。"米国の主要査読学術誌" 掲載の論文での数字……ということは。あと他の学術領域はどんなもんなのかなあ。 / “心理学の研究結果、6割以上が再現不可能 検証調…” http://t.co/ttC5zbcwjh
Large-scale replication studies by psychologists. "Thirty-six percent of replications had significant results" http://t.co/HBiCMSDtaK
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
La replicación en Psicología... ¿nuestros resultados están inflados? http://t.co/R4yPpsAM6T
RT @MarcusMunafo: Reproducibility Project published: http://t.co/u1EQ8LR0z0 ...coverage here: http://t.co/avznj2mttL and many other places!
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/cmClDJUwrY Have you read this @ettah @MichelTdS?
Our researcher @GavinBSullivan has been involved in a large study on the reproducibility of psychology findings: http://t.co/c9u5T11hib
RT @Irreductible: @DrFColom El paper original no lo especifica... Son experimentos extraidos de PSCI, JPSP, JEP:LMC http://t.co/akgYxCFX…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @DermotLynott: #ReproducibilityProject findings are out in Science. Frankly, I now feel more optimistic about the future of psych http:/…
The Reproducibility Project is out: http://t.co/PedofVTIIs #IsScienceBroken
RT @SteveStuWill: Psychology replication project: 39 of 100 papers replicated http://t.co/gnj8HDgPS1 Original Article: http://t.co/UdGvql3…
RT @DermotLynott: #ReproducibilityProject findings are out in Science. Frankly, I now feel more optimistic about the future of psych http:/…
Innovation points out paths that are possible; replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both http://t.co/uetseGxdqI
@chartgerink I found some here, but e.g., staffords/ lakens analysis is mentioned in the paper ya? congrats btw! :D http://t.co/jFgUEknwdS
#ReproducibilityProject findings are out in Science. Frankly, I now feel more optimistic about the future of psych http://t.co/tms6HYemBx
RT @psychmac: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (pdf) http://t.co/4VZWIvGRpI
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
元論文これか Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/7LKDN1bwwj
RT @NikosNtoumanis: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science; not good news.. published in Science today: http://t.co/6V6HVP…
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (pdf) http://t.co/4VZWIvGRpI
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @JHBalsters: everyones talking about it! great research on #reproducibility in #psychology, so what's next? http://t.co/i4OXLRg2DH
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2