RT @andre_spicer: What happens when you replicate 100 published studies in psychology? http://t.co/icuWuycC3Q
RT @lakens: This afternoon I'll be talking on Dutch radio (@dekennisvannu) about our #ReproducibilityProject (read paper: http://t.co/yugFQ…
"Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science" Shows that psychology needs better theories! http://t.co/Hn0gcls9my
RT @lakens: This afternoon I'll be talking on Dutch radio (@dekennisvannu) about our #ReproducibilityProject (read paper: http://t.co/yugFQ…
RT @andre_spicer: What happens when you replicate 100 published studies in psychology? http://t.co/icuWuycC3Q
RT @lakens: This afternoon I'll be talking on Dutch radio (@dekennisvannu) about our #ReproducibilityProject (read paper: http://t.co/yugFQ…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @LanguageMIT: trying to replicate psych studies: 97% of original studies had p<0.05 effect; only 36% of replications did http://t.co/ggr…
#openscience So only a third of the psychology studies are reproducible ! @sciencemagazine http://t.co/h1E0PpdiYn http://t.co/lXFUkbOTw7
RT @andre_spicer: What happens when you replicate 100 published studies in psychology? http://t.co/icuWuycC3Q
RT @wilte: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. 36% replications significant results http://t.co/3OCkvCqo6J http://t.c…
RT @casey6r0wn: Psychology more reproducible than candidate gene studies: http://t.co/wSPxwORkzj
La reproductibilité des études de psychologie. [TW : Statistiques. Much statistiques] http://t.co/nXE0sH5Rdt
This afternoon I'll be talking on Dutch radio (@dekennisvannu) about our #ReproducibilityProject (read paper: http://t.co/yugFQOdHRi).
Reproducibility is a defining feature of science. What if there is little to no reproducibility? http://t.co/zhtSoYAZkg
RT @LanguageMIT: trying to replicate psych studies: 97% of original studies had p<0.05 effect; only 36% of replications did http://t.co/ggr…
What happens when you replicate 100 published studies in psychology? http://t.co/icuWuycC3Q
RT @LanguageMIT: trying to replicate psych studies: 97% of original studies had p<0.05 effect; only 36% of replications did http://t.co/ggr…
RT @SteveStuWill: Psychology replication project: 39 of 100 papers replicated http://t.co/gnj8HDgPS1 Original Article: http://t.co/UdGvql3…
RT @social_sjs: Heart-warming to see scientists who bother to reproduce experiments http://t.co/9AJlWquvtQ & http://t.co/tOhkWs1dwG @BrianN…
RT @LanguageMIT: trying to replicate psych studies: 97% of original studies had p<0.05 effect; only 36% of replications did http://t.co/ggr…
RT @NikosNtoumanis: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science; not good news.. published in Science today: http://t.co/6V6HVP…
Effect sizes are a better predictor of replication success than p-values. http://t.co/9MpCEeYDbp http://t.co/6jrYN6pk4t
reproducibility study shows only 36% of studies are again significant when repeated. Very importatn work by @lakens. http://t.co/XPddBLpnqm
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science: http://t.co/mR65yMNDQ6
Aan zo'n plaatje kun je een aardige cursus statistiek vastknopen: bron:http://t.co/xq3b4sTfmN http://t.co/oqb0AzDmuS
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
http://t.co/O3EIKFYvpB "A large portion of replications produced weaker evidence for the original findings” especially surprising effects
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Over reproduceerbaarheid psych onderzoeksresulaten http://t.co/xq3b4sTfmN (ook in @volkskrant vandaag)
RT @russpoldrack: "Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both" htt…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. 36% replications significant results http://t.co/3OCkvCqo6J http://t.co/rbcd2MS8B8
@matseinarsen here's the article: http://t.co/ZhC4h4SHpA and the tabloid take: http://t.co/kzt9cnMe64
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Science: resultaten. psychologische experimenten vaak niet reproduceerbaar. http://t.co/N18WNeIxK8
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
Poor reproducibility. The inescapable consequence of a field that relies on P < .05 as a standard for detection? http://t.co/tnJOBzVUKL
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
"Change is already in the air" #Psychology Yong http://t.co/02N5ZXOkBq Nosek http://t.co/1pVFqfaHBm RWatch-Witcherts http://t.co/n3fOfLivvW
Scientific innovation is to possible; replication is to likely; progress relies on both - http://t.co/WLCcUtizOU @sciencemagazine
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
RT @russpoldrack: "Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both" htt…
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
RT @NikosNtoumanis: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science; not good news.. published in Science today: http://t.co/6V6HVP…
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @NikosNtoumanis: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science; not good news.. published in Science today: http://t.co/6V6HVP…
RT @JohnAntonakis: Findings in psychology cannot be reproduced. We need to fix this problem: http://t.co/J9VqviW20u
Interesting article on reproducibility in scientific research http://t.co/AAfoPyGXnm #science
Top #science story: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/TsQUue5una, see more http://t.co/zYmGuZ3rN9
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @russpoldrack: "Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both" htt…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @russpoldrack: "Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both" htt…
RT @JurgenPfeffer: This week in @sciencemagazine "Large portion of replicated studies produce weaker evidence for the original findings" ht…
Grim evidence about lack of reproducibility in cognitive and social science research http://t.co/T2ChHZqCxw
Hmmm... http://t.co/ApzGxQErHh
RT @larsonchristina: Estimating reproducibility of psychological science - just 35 out of 100 papers' results studied could be replicated: …
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @EricTopol: Seeing a lot of replications on lack psych study reproducibility:) http://t.co/iBUbIqWhbk @edyong209 @juliaoftoronto http://…
Estimating reproducibility of psychological science - just 35 out of 100 papers' results studied could be replicated: http://t.co/X75wttgFAi
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @efhmd: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/j2l3qDDeB2
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science: 36% of replications had significant results (original = 97%) http://t.co/97J5HJlgtk
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science - Science Magazine http://t.co/7Y7McAq7OK
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @russpoldrack: "Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both" htt…
@sciencemagazine on psychology tests failing reproducibility tests http://t.co/KOSJMioSnz, or why we need reproducible research #datascience
RT @MarilynSchlitz: Science | From AAAS #research #methods http://t.co/4PrHwlRnj1
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Science | From AAAS #research #methods http://t.co/4PrHwlRnj1
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
Massive project testing 100 psych experiments found failure to replicate in more than half http://t.co/tfDcIi4gX8 http://t.co/nz16Er0kIn
RT @NikosNtoumanis: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science; not good news.. published in Science today: http://t.co/6V6HVP…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/77CZpFkyHH
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science; not good news.. published in Science today: http://t.co/6V6HVP2Eqh
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
Props to our psychology colleagues for doing this landmark study on reproducibility. http://t.co/QwHeQeOrMM
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2