RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @gkushnick: Less than half of the studies were able to replicate the original result: http://t.co/bctTaYBnkl
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @JurgenPfeffer: This week in @sciencemagazine "Large portion of replicated studies produce weaker evidence for the original findings" ht…
Great effort to replicate 100 psychology studies finds that only 39% of effects replicate: http://t.co/hzSeuitzQV
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/vCfIOGzlcO
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
This week in @sciencemagazine "Large portion of replicated studies produce weaker evidence for the original findings" http://t.co/ISwkQPINku
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @JustinEsarey: It's time to be concerned about replicability in the social sciences. http://t.co/2wmnZpSkCE http://t.co/BsOZc9VAPy
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @DanielPAldrich: MT http://t.co/zUz7fzTRGC how #replicable were #psych experiments? (hint: some) @kinggary @PolSciReplicate @MaxAbrahms …
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
100-study #psychology #replication effort published by @openscience today: http://t.co/SUXXCMzODK
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @uranus_2: 心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w19…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
心理学の実験や相関研究の追試100個の分析。追試研究の平均効果量はオリジナルの平均効果量の半分。オリジナルの97%は有意な結果だが、追試では36%。オリジナルの効果量で追試の95%信頼区間に入っているのは47% etc。http://t.co/w1909EwdXF
RT @casey6r0wn: Psychology more reproducible than candidate gene studies: http://t.co/wSPxwORkzj
Another paper showing (in multiple ways) how published finding are often not reproducible http://t.co/xjug9Ljr9b
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Science | From AAAS Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science http://t.co/hmFbYkhjuB
Science works, but lets keep questioning it. #Science #interestingPlots http://t.co/mkEQEf8i2G
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science - Science Magazine http://t.co/9zm75ZOQd3
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science - Science Magazine http://t.co/cYINzMSolm
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science - Science Magazine http://t.co/FVpQbp37KT
RT @LanguageMIT: trying to replicate psych studies: 97% of original studies had p<0.05 effect; only 36% of replications did http://t.co/ggr…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @JelteWicherts: Whoomp there it is! Nail on the coffin of “psychology has no replication problem” http://t.co/GaleITLRcj http://t.co/iV4…
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
Study of 100 psychology experiments finds only 39% replicable. Wonder what they’d find if they repeated it, though? http://t.co/udImHVTkGQ
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @CollabraOA: #Reproducibility Project: Psychology published its findings in Science today. Congrats! http://t.co/KEEeNavzt6 & http://t.c…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
trying to replicate psych studies: 97% of original studies had p<0.05 effect; only 36% of replications did http://t.co/ggrSiCW6JZ
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science - Science Magazine http://t.co/2JZFk3Dbhi #psicologiaTime #psico
@PsychToday There are problems in psych research w/replication!Thoughts? Replicate the failure to replicate study! http://t.co/fgUpEdARFz
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
An quantitative examination of reproducibility (a defining feature of #science) in #Psychology Via @IDLabUB http://t.co/02alS887A8
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @JelteWicherts: Whoomp there it is! Nail on the coffin of “psychology has no replication problem” http://t.co/GaleITLRcj http://t.co/iV4…
RT @GhostfaceWiller: Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject htt…
RT @sciencemagazine: Effort to repeat 100 psychological studies yields sobering results http://t.co/cX0FiG8Jjv #FREE
"Our" paper is out: http://t.co/tTv4ZohSny #ReproducibilityProject
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Here's an important finding: more surprising findings were less likely to replicate in the #ReproducibilityProject http://t.co/58KK4X2mbU
Study repeats psych experiments. Sig. results in 97% of original studies, 36% of replications: http://t.co/g6lrI5YCBk http://t.co/D6BD9uZnq6
'Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science' raises Q's: should we be able to reproduce every study? http://t.co/5gf5cFZ1UH
RT @BrianNosek: #ReproducibilityProject http://t.co/P2decGM0h4 published in Science http://t.co/ROZYJjzeGF https://t.co/AVS5Z9als8
"Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science" - http://t.co/qMogQUCskK
Interesting approach to assessing reproducibility in health research. Original reports suggest greater benefit. http://t.co/6oPYvnZUn2
“97% of original studies had significant results (P<.05). 36% of replications had significant results;” http://t.co/9dKl9HPt1k
A must read: Open Science Collaboration on reproducibility in psychological science - this is how science works! http://t.co/frYDJAzKXL
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @russpoldrack: "Innovation points out paths that are possible;replication points out paths that are likely; progress relies on both" htt…
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
incentive structure in #science is flawed. it leads to irreproducibility. identical to @lessig's take on govmt. http://t.co/OB4ISMjzuB
Once again, studies show studies are false. My take: https://t.co/4VjHvKloFa. Today's news: http://t.co/MkRZxZ2ppv
RT @KriegeskorteLab: an important step for psychology... http://t.co/lQpq9ddqJs
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
"Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science" http://t.co/XSoIkvv50B
Replication research in 'Science' suggests only 39% of studies in #psychology reproduce original findings http://t.co/HBAsiEcgKW
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
Striking failures of replication in large new #psychology study; despite the headlines, this is good news for psych- http://t.co/9c5Wm4W9XG
#Reproducibility Project: Psychology published its findings in Science today. Congrats! http://t.co/KEEeNavzt6 & http://t.co/kvzWElzeYz
RT @CFCamerer: Mixed results replicating 100 psych studies @sciencemagazine (old + new data--> 68% effects>0) http://t.co/YF5usTDrd1 http:/…
MT http://t.co/zUz7fzTRGC how #replicable were #psych experiments? (hint: some) @kinggary @PolSciReplicate @MaxAbrahms @amhst20 @ASAnews
RT @davidzote: Muchos estudios psicológicos no fueron reproducibles http://t.co/IcuiQgTNpC y http://t.co/SQTntuYiD7
RT @SamJNorton: So most published research findings really are false http://t.co/gNiOrLAqpw
RT @JelteWicherts: Whoomp there it is! Nail on the coffin of “psychology has no replication problem” http://t.co/GaleITLRcj http://t.co/iV4…
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Worrying results for the field. http://t.co/0AhbtWLMq7
RT @KriegeskorteLab: an important step for psychology... http://t.co/lQpq9ddqJs
RT @OSFramework: #ReproducibilityProject published:100 psych replications observe effects 1/2 size of originals http://t.co/lOWZ2KpkFt http…
an important step for psychology... http://t.co/lQpq9ddqJs
RT @rdpeng: Someone has to say it, but this plot shows that science is, in fact, working. http://t.co/JUy10xHfbH http://t.co/lJSx6IxPw2