| Title |
Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt.4192 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Kosicki, Kärt Tomberg, Allan Bradley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,351 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 291 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 104 | 8% |
| Spain | 40 | 3% |
| Japan | 31 | 2% |
| France | 29 | 2% |
| Germany | 29 | 2% |
| Canada | 28 | 2% |
| India | 24 | 2% |
| Australia | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 215 | 16% |
| Unknown | 538 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 818 | 61% |
| Scientists | 480 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 28 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,064 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2064 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 375 | 18% |
| Researcher | 343 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 277 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 190 | 9% |
| Other | 89 | 4% |
| Other | 229 | 11% |
| Unknown | 561 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 709 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 345 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 57 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 54 | 3% |
| Other | 192 | 9% |
| Unknown | 618 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2301. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,655
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#5
of 8,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53
of 341,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#1
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.