RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
Whoops? Future of fMRI? https://t.co/rHxGRSaiEd
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/k95KoaLRXJ #fmri #statistics
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6XzzSUlfsy
STUDY of false positives in fMRI analysis has serious implications if correct! #OHBM2016 #FNIRS @_lordofthelight https://t.co/nkjW1cEpHJ
This is stunning. https://t.co/dHk03uZvU1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
Se nám to druhé osvícenství rozpadá a Dan Ariely se směje. "fMRI analysis false-positive rates of up to 70%" https://t.co/EYOpx1vDeM
@JoshuaHendrikse @andrew_wandern and fMRI buffs, have you seen this? False Positives in fMRI https://t.co/lc6uBfKJpM
fmri clusterf**k? https://t.co/yx4Rr9Rih4
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/etK7rHfuF9
RT @Pascallisch: Confusion between data and "simulated data" dramatically inflates fMRI false positive rates: https://t.co/2tFcsbsZNZ
RT @sciencequiche: Woah - am I reading this PNAS neuro abstract right? #Reproducibility https://t.co/0DtzGObXmx https://t.co/5jPBkGI4BC
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @Pascallisch: Confusion between data and "simulated data" dramatically inflates fMRI false positive rates: https://t.co/2tFcsbsZNZ
RT @Pascallisch: Confusion between data and "simulated data" dramatically inflates fMRI false positive rates: https://t.co/2tFcsbsZNZ
RT @Pascallisch: Confusion between data and "simulated data" dramatically inflates fMRI false positive rates: https://t.co/2tFcsbsZNZ
Confusion between data and "simulated data" dramatically inflates fMRI false positive rates: https://t.co/2tFcsbsZNZ
RT @torwager: cluster extent thresholding in fMRI/PET increases false positives, voxel-wise is OK https://t.co/LoD6BcV2RY https://t.co/Enx…
required reading if you run fMRI studies: https://t.co/HArOJzCgIO
RT @torwager: cluster extent thresholding in fMRI/PET increases false positives, voxel-wise is OK https://t.co/LoD6BcV2RY https://t.co/Enx…
These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies ... https://t.co/c1LWKxhfiL
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @torwager: cluster extent thresholding in fMRI/PET increases false positives, voxel-wise is OK https://t.co/LoD6BcV2RY https://t.co/Enx…
RT @WolbersLab: Important paper on the problems of cluster-based inference in fMRI: https://t.co/Ou0HwaVmax
RT @sciencequiche: Woah - am I reading this PNAS neuro abstract right? #Reproducibility https://t.co/0DtzGObXmx https://t.co/5jPBkGI4BC
RT @zakkohane: I sensed a great disturbance https://t.co/oYrN0AlrmY in the #incidentalome https://t.co/39becagH6D as if myriad humans were…
RT @sciencequiche: Woah - am I reading this PNAS neuro abstract right? #Reproducibility https://t.co/0DtzGObXmx https://t.co/5jPBkGI4BC
RT @sciencequiche: Woah - am I reading this PNAS neuro abstract right? #Reproducibility https://t.co/0DtzGObXmx https://t.co/5jPBkGI4BC
RT @kjhealy: This should be fun. https://t.co/vfnEItn3yi https://t.co/ufm1qpTUFx
RT @sciencequiche: Woah - am I reading this PNAS neuro abstract right? #Reproducibility https://t.co/0DtzGObXmx https://t.co/5jPBkGI4BC
RT @zakkohane: I sensed a great disturbance https://t.co/oYrN0AlrmY in the #incidentalome https://t.co/39becagH6D as if myriad humans were…
RT @zakkohane: I sensed a great disturbance https://t.co/oYrN0AlrmY in the #incidentalome https://t.co/39becagH6D as if myriad humans were…
I sensed a great disturbance https://t.co/oYrN0AlrmY in the #incidentalome https://t.co/39becagH6D as if myriad humans were misdiagnosed
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
Gasp. "Results question validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies... large impact on the interpretation of neuroimaging" https://t.co/H0pZlXT9bi
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @mumbrainstats: cluster failure! Check your current thresholding strategy's true FP rate. The Eklund paper is in PNAS https://t.co/HbR0b…
RT @DoctorZen: Title of this fMRI #neuroscience paper is "Cluster failure", but I'll bet the draft title was "Cluster f---." https://t.co/c…
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @ICA_CSaB: (1/3) Important paper on issues related to cluster-based corrections for multiple comparisons in fMRI data https://t.co/4vjlD…
Permutation tests are so easy to implement. We should have been doing this for a long time now. https://t.co/W7GWSo65lx
"These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/fi6Mq15XGM
RT @russpoldrack: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/69oIl7wFHN by @te…
RT @Lab_Journal: Auweia, neues PNAS-Paper stellt funktionelles Neuroimaging via fMRT massiv in Frage https://t.co/oO5d7jmDdD https://t.co/M…
After the pre-print + reply, now the paper "questioning validity of 40k studies" -- will be an interesting exchange. https://t.co/F2AoopUr19
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
"Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates" now out https://t.co/MJsk55oPaW w/ @wandedob
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
https://t.co/myRgpZ9Zas why cluster based fmri inferences are flawed
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @hardsci: Good news, they found more helium. Bad news, all your analyses are invalid https://t.co/HhpkNQyjF9
¡Falsos positivos en estudios de tareas por FMRI ! "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/EwzLeNBWpp
RT @russpoldrack: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/69oIl7wFHN by @te…
Overstatement or nothing we've done matters? "These results question the validity of 40,000 fMRI studies"... https://t.co/SnnSL0zysd
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
Common statistics software used with fMRI yields 70% rather than the predicted 5% false positives in resting data. https://t.co/9FOsf6oG6D
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @minzlicht: Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
Good news everyone..."these results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies..." https://t.co/Q0tOIxrGL1
Up to 70% false positives with the most widely used fmri software packages? https://t.co/HUG0SyWJQr
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @laurenatlas: Fun times 4 fMRI! "the most common software packages (SPM/FSL/AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%" https…
RT @laurenatlas: Fun times 4 fMRI! "the most common software packages (SPM/FSL/AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%" https…