RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
Wow. Have only read the sig statement, but this looks like an important study for all those doing fMRI https://t.co/uX1y2Mlfgn
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/VrhM2X8mlr
What's the rate for false positives in fMRI? Here's a hint: it's above 5%. https://t.co/jo4AaM80SY
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
RT @wandedob: My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
My cluster failure paper with @ten_photos is now finally out in PNAS https://t.co/5DSl5U8Kjv #fMRI #OHBM2016 #openaccess
Careful w/ fMRI: "cluster size inference w/ cluster def threshold p = .01 generates familywise error rates up to 60%"https://t.co/fRbZOHqm9E
@tom_hartley @ChrisFiloG yes, but SPM and FSL also have problems, see https://t.co/WNzpYCxQZP
And also today I'm pointing somebody to this paper https://t.co/9LWei4sX8Z @wandedob is it still under review?
@NKriegeskorte @fMRI_today related to my preprint which showed inflated false positive rates for cluster inference https://t.co/JRZxncUPOD
RT @Helena_LB: So @wandedob stopped by yesterday and told me about this: https://t.co/kj7qI71Pgw which @Neuro_Skeptic wrote about: https://…
So @wandedob stopped by yesterday and told me about this: https://t.co/kj7qI71Pgw which @Neuro_Skeptic wrote about: https://t.co/VoMP7aBn1y
RT @fierycushman: New analysis suggests parametric cluster-wise thresholds grossly inflate significance for fMRI group analysis: https://t…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @fierycushman: New analysis suggests parametric cluster-wise thresholds grossly inflate significance for fMRI group analysis: https://t…
New analysis suggests parametric cluster-wise thresholds grossly inflate significance for fMRI group analysis: https://t.co/brN5Yabyuz
@practiCalfMRI @dixy0 more worried about the spatial auto correlation function, see Figure 9 https://t.co/JRZxncUPOD
holy cow: SPM gets 20% false pos rate for p=0.01 and clusterbased analysis https://t.co/h2V6NZdmSI #reproducibleresearch
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
https://t.co/U8UJpKNgcB permutation is expensive but works, peak-wise RFT is cheap but too stringent, cluster-RFT is just crazy (FPR= 60%)
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
Decision to use non-parametric stats in our emotional imagery paper looks prudent given this https://t.co/U76StquOPq https://t.co/CzUz93Yc3h
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @velascop: Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies? https://t.co/yOIY1nfGDp cc @olivia_petit
"cluster size inference with a cluster defining threshold of p = 0.01 generates familywise error rates up to 60%." https://t.co/NOu539lymi
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies? https://t.co/yOIY1nfGDp cc @olivia_petit
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @neuro_data: another gem from Eklund: [1511.01863] Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies? https://t…
[1511.01863] Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group… https://t.co/odOZFX9cdx, see more https://t.co/P6itrQPnIb
RT @neuro_data: another gem from Eklund: [1511.01863] Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies? https://t…
RT @neuro_data: another gem from Eklund: [1511.01863] Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies? https://t…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @NeuroNerd13: Can we trust parametric statistical methods for group fMRI studies? https://t.co/vkgYBZqm8J via @ten_photos #fmri
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
Can we trust parametric statistical methods for group fMRI studies? https://t.co/vkgYBZqm8J via @ten_photos #fmri
"cluster size inference with a cluster defining threshold of p = 0.01 generates familywise error rates up to 60%" https://t.co/6Wvwo1mX9w
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https…
Big problems with parametric stats for group fMRI https://t.co/picxBnsHbb by @wandedob @ten_photos. See also post: https://t.co/SmqUvetJ6I
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
RT @ten_photos: Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.c…
Another massive empirical analysis from Anders Eklund: Be very wary of marginal P=0.01 cluster-forming results. https://t.co/2ELEaNdLoz
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…
RT @KriegeskorteLab: permutation tests are powerful and safer than parametric methods for fMRI statistical inference. https://t.co/T04ZRpog…