RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/gqibaESnuN
False-positive rates of up to 70% found in fMRI studies. May impact the interpretation of weakly significant results https://t.co/Tx2NciBp59
RT @ProfLHunter: Bad statistical assumptions & sw bug overturn 40,000 fMRI papers. Big role for open data & sharing in finding this https:…
Are Most #fMRI Studies #Statistically Meaningless?! #neuroscience #health2 https://t.co/oDzn4YxMfy
Are MoSt #fMRI Studies #Statistically Meaningless? https://t.co/oDzn4YxMfy
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/9TgmeEhGAF #fMRI #falsePositive
RT @ProfLHunter: Bad statistical assumptions & sw bug overturn 40,000 fMRI papers. Big role for open data & sharing in finding this https:…
Bad statistical assumptions & sw bug overturn 40,000 fMRI papers. Big role for open data & sharing in finding this https://t.co/ZbZC6aWWpm
The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduWRg6 #openscience
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates: PNAS https://t.co/Z4s0b51GnN
Alarming @PNASNews study reveals statistical concerns with #neuroscience #fmri studies. https://t.co/jVXcvA2mi0
fMRI problem paper: software based on flawed Gaussian model. https://t.co/ABrlRHF5T8 #science #programming
RT @PirateOrg: A coding mistake could invalidate the findings from thousands of #fMRI-based studies https://t.co/cVG1Dw500e #ooops https:/…
@rguha this is a big problem in medical imaging. Recently made the news due to this study https://t.co/CQphKCIb6W
@SwiftOnSecurity except most fMRI studies are bollocks thanks to problems in the software. https://t.co/TdLvsG6NOt
@ritholtz @business Unfortunately, fMRI data has not been robust in reproducibility. https://t.co/ZWax2hXKYZ
Wait! What? A Cluster F---- ailure 20 Years' Worth Of FMRI Studies May Be Bunk, Thanks To A Software Error https://t.co/fdGUR4Drgc
RT @PirateOrg: A coding mistake could invalidate the findings from thousands of #fMRI-based studies https://t.co/cVG1Dw500e #ooops https:/…
Squirtle is displeased that MacCulloch cites fMRI work in neuroeconomics without noting these problems. https://t.co/R3s9oDZA7n
RT @PirateOrg: A coding mistake could invalidate the findings from thousands of #fMRI-based studies https://t.co/cVG1Dw500e #ooops https:/…
RT @PirateOrg: A coding mistake could invalidate the findings from thousands of #fMRI-based studies https://t.co/cVG1Dw500e #ooops https:/…
RT @PirateOrg: A coding mistake could invalidate the findings from thousands of #fMRI-based studies https://t.co/cVG1Dw500e #ooops https:/…
RT @PirateOrg: A coding mistake could invalidate the findings from thousands of #fMRI-based studies https://t.co/cVG1Dw500e #ooops https:/…
A coding mistake could invalidate the findings from thousands of #fMRI-based studies https://t.co/cVG1Dw500e #ooops https://t.co/K0aybpaEc6
https://t.co/4UGzvOfUy6 o de como los psicólogos (entre otros) nos acabamos de llevar un palo... #fRMI #voyarevisarunpardecosasahoravengo
Validity of fMRI studies questioned #brain research https://t.co/LppIJkFKds
@hardsci may I suggest the cluster failure paper for extra credit in your syllabus? https://t.co/r1UduDbz7B
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @freddiedeboer: The perception that the significance crisis is only a problem in the soft or social sciences is incorrect. https://t.co/…
"Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates" | https://t.co/Y7SGPrkwXx via @PNASNews
RT @freddiedeboer: The perception that the significance crisis is only a problem in the soft or social sciences is incorrect. https://t.co/…
RT @freddiedeboer: The perception that the significance crisis is only a problem in the soft or social sciences is incorrect. https://t.co/…
RT @AlejandroRiR: @GiselaEiC L'article de El País i el paper. Per si t'interessa. https://t.co/I4UwhNlM3w https://t.co/yanFS8xa21
@GiselaEiC L'article de El País i el paper. Per si t'interessa. https://t.co/I4UwhNlM3w https://t.co/yanFS8xa21
RT @StatGenDan: Wow. "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" in PNAS. https://t.co/bxgf0k2Qdg
@StatGenDan @markmccarthyoxf Although see: https://t.co/T2i2VDrOWJ
RT @StatGenDan: Wow. "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" in PNAS. https://t.co/bxgf0k2Qdg
RT @JakobDrud: The most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70% https:/…
Wow. "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" in PNAS. https://t.co/bxgf0k2Qdg
https://t.co/QWvaBxJ2nE @ElNeuroTales @parapapush @cesar_acevedot
SPM, FSL, AFNI software packages for fMRI analysis appear to result in false-positive rates of up to 70% ie NOT 5% https://t.co/7OWhPjiST5
The most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70% https://t.co/o8OWY3XxCZ
Yikes. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/rC2txaJUDl
RT @pierre_azoulay: Paging all innovation-minded economics grad students: natural experiment alert! https://t.co/WGV3nILMKN
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/peapPqKg4D
RT @JohnAntonakis: Inference in #fMRI studies very questionable! Shocking but expected given low level of statistics training. https://t.co…
Interesting... https://t.co/ggpjy2thMu
In the context of #evidencebased medicine, that questions the level of trust (of faith?) we have in the "evidence" https://t.co/VAlolB8wJT
These results question the validity of lots of fMRI studies&large impact on interpretation of neuroimaging results https://t.co/mGCTo3aVNg
Oh ooh 🙈🙈 https://t.co/9cBuDhb9RN
Una reciente revisión sugiere la invalidación de aproximadamente 3.500 estudios científicos realizados en los... https://t.co/RhLB74emvZ
Study finds bug in #fMRI software & it raises questions on some 40k pub #research papers. https://t.co/8RAYKvaYID #psychology #neuro #brain
FMRIs: the new phrenology? https://t.co/KrzDnWlb6x
A lot of fMRI studies might have been wrong due to inappropriate analyses methods .. honestly, that's quite scary https://t.co/VAlolB8wJT
Bug in #fMRI soft calls 15y of research into question https://t.co/qPyRzd2Pq6 https://t.co/q33crO8Okh https://t.co/6Ihy2NQAgd #IRMf #Patatra
#RPE scales are better: Software packages for fMRI analysis can result in ~70% false-positive rates https://t.co/Vh7p9gYfIr via @gmarquez_11
RT @testpro_uy: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates: https://t.co/iVoDhWwEte
RT @TBaubet: Me demande combien d'études de neuroimagerie présentées comme très rigoureuses cela invalide https://t.co/xmrUO2w4zm https://t…
Me demande combien d'études de neuroimagerie présentées comme très rigoureuses cela invalide https://t.co/xmrUO2w4zm https://t.co/pWZKkqpmF0
RT @ishikun3: これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
RT @ishikun3: これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
RT @ishikun3: これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
RT @ishikun3: これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
RT @ishikun3: これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
RT @ishikun3: これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
RT @ishikun3: これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
これヤバイすね。過去25年間に行われた40,000ものfMRI研究は、ソフトウェアのミスで間違ってる可能性→https://t.co/wx4PMNNLSd
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates: https://t.co/iVoDhWwEte
Thanks @PNASNews @pnas for your review. https://t.co/4En4IPVAgx
RT @a_baronca: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/JBDjKX26Ij
The consequences of blindly believe black boxes and the need to store raw data for revision by others... https://t.co/rQvKdO0mFp
False positive in Science, bad praxis using bioinformatic tools https://t.co/JqDfzrMxvF @scienmag @CientificoenEsp
20 años y 40.000 artículos publicados a la basura: error catastrófico en los análisis de fMRI. Increíble! https://t.co/zH4ymwLz2e
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/44CyoCMHRN
RT @a_baronca: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/JBDjKX26Ij
"These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/JBDjKX26Ij
I am really shocked to read that some fMRI-based inferences could be wrong ... https://t.co/XeiU0E3RfP @UeaMed @OfficialNIHR
Cluster failure:Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates #liberation (v @lupicinio) https://t.co/2Fec5Ll6E3
Uh-oh... The software for MRI is not that good, apparently... https://t.co/E7fgmlgUuf
¿ Decepción? Fallos de software, escaso rigor científico ? https://t.co/zd6C5uvhnO
¿ Decepción ? https://t.co/zd6C5uvhnO
(PNAS) Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/tgO2WwZaXm via sanoysalvobl…
Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/SGiuS60wg0 #fMRI #Statistics
Lately I see many articles stating misuse of statistics (or blind faith I should say) https://t.co/SGiuS60wg0 #Neuroscience #Statistics
Cluster failure: Why #fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. https://t.co/dk7nwGWK4e
Original | "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/Aajsb3VQF0 Llegim-ho amb calma, però ànims a tots.
The most common software packages for fMRI analysis can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%. #Brain #PNAS https://t.co/5xozU9Ystv
Cluster failure: Why #fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated #falsepositive rates https://t.co/JcT60YWsmK
Deficient validation of software could invalidate years of fMRI studies https://t.co/n49XwiZvk0
Most common soft. packages for fMRI analysis can result in false-positive rates of up to 70% https://t.co/uo8jcrbZur https://t.co/ZRDWRKfcMO
Voxelgate. 1,000s of papers on fMRI affected. https://t.co/kJP4vRfk6f