Data sharing: "a new class of research person will emerge", ie research parasite. Am I missing something? https://t.co/GP90bPg2yX
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @davidroodman: I am a research parasite https://t.co/dUW4R8efEe
RT @ivanoransky: Logan cites controversial @NEJM "research parasites" editorial #AHCJ16 https://t.co/6dS09lE3AJ
RT @ivanoransky: Logan cites controversial @NEJM "research parasites" editorial #AHCJ16 https://t.co/6dS09lE3AJ
Logan cites controversial @NEJM "research parasites" editorial #AHCJ16 https://t.co/6dS09lE3AJ
@kwbroman @donmoyn Must keep the #researchparasites from corrupting beautiful science. https://t.co/8m0DuaU8H1
I am a research parasite https://t.co/dUW4R8efEe
What is a "research parasite?" Is this a problem? https://t.co/ng7fH6gEaG
@andpru @RheeMor e.g. this has an altmetric of 2174 https://t.co/WBmsRVYCVE
Very pertinent question in this editorial. Are we seeing parasitic or symbiotic relationships in Data Sharing: NEJM https://t.co/j1xOrzyVzl
NACDA is getting a lot of questions on Research Parasites at #PAA2016. Read about it at NEJM https://t.co/5nnBnusVec
Data Sharing. https://t.co/9aqbWU7CCS rehashing research parasites #tbicri16
RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16
may be a bit late, but agreed: not @nejm's finest moment. https://t.co/qxVZLacsAR
RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16
RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16
This paper is why it's hard to get people to share data. Ouch https://t.co/oTp163xQTT #tbicri16
RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16
.@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16
NEJM editor describes new generation scientist as 'Research Parasite' https://t.co/GmiGsSdk3i
NEJM https://t.co/OMJ6A8xLqc data sharing
Clash on data sharing: @iscb (https://t.co/2bdsixMxkt) comment on position of @NEJM (https://t.co/c0s8rbz30O) @ODIHQ
RT @jcdrg: https://t.co/snCjq4b8zJ According to NEJM, sharing data could lead people to disprove other people's research (sic). Science as …
https://t.co/snCjq4b8zJ According to NEJM, sharing data could lead people to disprove other people's research (sic). Science as religion!
are half of the researchers I know #ResearchParasites, including me. why?bc we do #register based #research https://t.co/vfETEO5Uoi
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
New England Journal of Medicineのこの記事っていろいろ考えさせられる。最初dryのことをparasiteと言っているのかと思ったけど、逆にもとれる。 https://t.co/f1hmDI7Eal
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…
I'd admit being a proud "Research Parasite". https://t.co/wPkrOpLuDf
Should you #share #data of medical research? #IAmAResearchParasite ??? https://t.co/z3cZMkmMgn
RT @betsyrolland: @pfanderson @TheBingle @pat_devine Or "research parasites" like in the NEJM article. https://t.co/7UFDVxggwu
@pfanderson @TheBingle @pat_devine Or "research parasites" like in the NEJM article. https://t.co/7UFDVxggwu
@FridaOSkog @christianruck Det tror jag med, men det finns ett starkt motstånd: https://t.co/45oCKMd4ij
NEJM questions data sharing to protect against "research parasites." #PrecisionMedicine #silos #DataScience https://t.co/ejfKFo5NuK
RT @itokouta: 当然、「寄生虫」呼ばわりされた人々はNEJMに激怒。ただ「寄生虫」が増えすぎて、仮に一次研究の担い手が減ってしまったら、彼らが寄生できる一次データすら欠乏してしまう。医療の進歩はそこで停滞してしまうのかもしれない。https://t.co/zExQE…
Interesting editorial from @NEJM on data sharing and "research parasites": https://t.co/Q4pREKIXPp #openscience
@mhbeals A classic spat in the "medicine" community. https://t.co/1iLvrE0jqc
@mhbeals This distinct car crash of an article in @NEJM: https://t.co/88SICyBCpL
NEJM editorial last month: Idea of data sharing is beautiful, but leads to research parasites: https://t.co/NRIWITT70c :)
RT @simonhodson99: Mons: ‘I am proud to be a data parasite’ - reuse of data is good! (pace NEJM editorial https://t.co/FFuXsuiEam) #idcc16
RT @simonhodson99: Mons: ‘I am proud to be a data parasite’ - reuse of data is good! (pace NEJM editorial https://t.co/FFuXsuiEam) #idcc16
RT @simonhodson99: Mons: ‘I am proud to be a data parasite’ - reuse of data is good! (pace NEJM editorial https://t.co/FFuXsuiEam) #idcc16
RT @simonhodson99: Mons: ‘I am proud to be a data parasite’ - reuse of data is good! (pace NEJM editorial https://t.co/FFuXsuiEam) #idcc16
RT @simonhodson99: Mons: ‘I am proud to be a data parasite’ - reuse of data is good! (pace NEJM editorial https://t.co/FFuXsuiEam) #idcc16
RT @simonhodson99: Mons: ‘I am proud to be a data parasite’ - reuse of data is good! (pace NEJM editorial https://t.co/FFuXsuiEam) #idcc16
Mons: ‘I am proud to be a data parasite’ - reuse of data is good! (pace NEJM editorial https://t.co/FFuXsuiEam) #idcc16
These opinions of doing analysis on others data is bad is concerning. #openscience and #openaccess need to push fwd https://t.co/dxRfVRz0Aw
#OpenData vs #DataParasite: Interesting @NEJM arguments before https://t.co/9UBppjvHhy and after https://t.co/cEh45kiLiH community feedback
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/mezIe1vJ9a #data #ethics
@Chris_Evelo Referring to this on research/data parasites: https://t.co/zxULBKbgnT
RT @mick_tagg: The @dataparasite https://t.co/JMcjhjUgxb irony plot thickens as @NEJM (!) Zika virus paper accused of the very same https:/…
The @dataparasite https://t.co/JMcjhjUgxb irony plot thickens as @NEJM (!) Zika virus paper accused of the very same https://t.co/6X7JG307al
People may "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited". Surely that's the point? https://t.co/vYE3ucPiav
Yet another advocacy of #datasharing benefits it comes from the medical domain https://t.co/RxDD6qOTAM
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/43RwA8NIfG #openscience
Origins of the 'research parasite' - should datasets be shared? #researchparasites https://t.co/oNHkfOe3Iz
@superhelical Start here: https://t.co/ZFQI9VZbj7
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @ontowonka: @force11rescomm blog https://t.co/hO5UJlu31O RE #researchparasites @NEJM https://t.co/tBUDTvuIbr, #Force2016 welcomes resear…
RT @EversJlh: The way to go: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/hiIBuufrMz
RT @EversJlh: The way to go: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/hiIBuufrMz
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
@edyong209 one could also see another blow for the @NEJM "research parasites" philosophy! https://t.co/aWCbSLAFI9 https://t.co/BrAhbE8USm
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/ibdDI9H4qO. Sharing #clinicaltrials data a win-win? Would this have prevented the #Bial disaster?
Dear @nejm may you should collaborate more https://t.co/O6BytgYqJ3
RT @fredtrotter: Both open data and meta analysis slammed in recent @NEJM editorial https://t.co/0QRFaK3Iwf
RT @fredtrotter: Both open data and meta analysis slammed in recent @NEJM editorial https://t.co/0QRFaK3Iwf
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/LTS8q22zBA
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/h3V1XHaHJi
in this @NEJM editorial the authors state that data meta-analysis is "parasitic research"... enjoy: Data sharing https://t.co/ifPjlWxR0i
@NEJM there's nothing wrong with reassessing and challenging scientific dogma -- it's how we identified penicillin. https://t.co/7XTbLXB87u
NEJM paper on Data Sharing' and despair over ;data parasites' https://t.co/TcO7yDnC3f #gulfscienceconference #opendata
#OpenScience: @iscb Responds to New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/XnZarQlO0k https://t.co/63hNNm6AfC
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/D5YfR1R36c
Strong (IMHO, misguided) condemnation of #data sharing via New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/LdwbcMFDtC https://t.co/ZxpCVXJVeM
Research parasites - Force11 https://t.co/XZ8l4JhGak thanks @MsPhelps <discuss> Data Sharing-NEJM https://t.co/azpfwyQ3Cl thanks @kaythaney
RT @rjgeller: 医療分野名学術雑誌NEJMにとんでもない意見論文が掲載。データを公開することに反対する理由として、誰かそのデータを使って元の論文の説を否定しようとする恐れがあるから、と。恥の上塗り。https://t.co/Hf2tgLyGkE https://t.…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/7vt5kmqBhv
Interesting thoughts on data sharing in this editorial: https://t.co/kv4J7zHdYi
Extremely disconcerting opinion on data sharing. This is exactly why you need to share |:-( https://t.co/1QqgfYHS01 https://t.co/8heeVZxjck
@jplotkin @digitalsci @NPRHealth Actually - my mistake: was referring (elliptically) to this NEJM editorial: https://t.co/BFUgklBqKe
Biden's Silo Conundrum: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/7JIvVZ6dR6
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
ICYMI: The "data parasites" op-ed from @NEJM editors in response to Biden's cancer moon shot stance https://t.co/tpdJzI2OfO