RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @sheacshl: 1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
RT @markgerstein: Dara sharing https://t.co/8Tfv3jzhPu Deems #datascientists as "research parasites," using another’s data for their own en…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
NEJM editorial criticizing data sharing highlights radical difference between medical and social sciences https://t.co/6t2mY8Bzb7”
RT @markgerstein: Dara sharing https://t.co/8Tfv3jzhPu Deems #datascientists as "research parasites," using another’s data for their own en…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @markgerstein: Dara sharing https://t.co/8Tfv3jzhPu Deems #datascientists as "research parasites," using another’s data for their own en…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @mihotep: Tax-funded #PublicHealth "researchers" raise alarm others may re-analyze their data & reach the correct conclusion https://t.c…
RT @mihotep: Tax-funded #PublicHealth "researchers" raise alarm others may re-analyze their data & reach the correct conclusion https://t.c…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
Dara sharing https://t.co/8Tfv3jzhPu Deems #datascientists as "research parasites," using another’s data for their own ends via @dspakowicz
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @bart: Data Sharing & the rise of "research parasites"— NEJM cc @LucColemont https://t.co/iNLqjK25oh
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
I always wanted to be a research parasite when I grew up. @NEJM https://t.co/WgEfipjrWY
Data Sharing & the rise of "research parasites"— NEJM cc @LucColemont https://t.co/iNLqjK25oh
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @schneiderleonid: Esteemed @NEJM doctors' message in nutshell: if you want my published data, make me co-author! https://t.co/WIQX4pVnqd…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @Malarky67: FFS NEJM. Using your data to refute your hypothesis= parasitism? Popper is spinning in his grave #researchparasites https:/…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
Does sharing data feed "research parasites"? NEJM https://t.co/KY0urALpxJ
RT @Katiissick: Opposing this article, #opendata benefits pts & health care . #researchparasites concept is ludicrous. https://t.co/E0suY6…
RT @davidlazer: A data free critique of data sharing in @NEJM https://t.co/Of4aEXeiFZ, pls provide evidence, any evidence, for any of the a…
RT @davidlazer: A data free critique of data sharing in @NEJM https://t.co/Of4aEXeiFZ, pls provide evidence, any evidence, for any of the a…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @sheacshl: 1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
Research data sharing works best symbiotically https://t.co/JgOP13tim6 by @DShaywitz https://t.co/iy4TE69liE https://t.co/Zdxbz6Sg2Q
RT @sheacshl: 1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
RT @tdverstynen: This is the single dumbest thing I've read in a science journal. Worse that it's in @NEJM. #researchparasites https://t.co…
@drseisenberg @chris_orl kind of ironic, considering @NEJM editorial on data sharing https://t.co/4os4NVHhRg
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @hwc001: Late to this, but NEJM getting a right twitter kicking for this pathetic piece of whining https://t.co/KgTruUTdxK #IAmAResearch…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: First rule of data sharing: work symbiotically, not parasitically. @NEJM @ArthurCaplan https://t.co/t0z76vbLnt
RT @sheacshl: 1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @sheacshl: 1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @sheacshl: 1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @mkrench: Afraid someone will refute hypothesis? Then data isnt fit to be published #researchparasites https://t.co/y5S7nwwXkw https://t…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @npch: Parasites play an important role in ecosystems. The scientific world would be worse off without #researchparasites https://t.co/K…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
"How would data sharing work best?" two doctors ask in @nejm https://t.co/tzotzZdAR9
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @chrisdc77: How lame. @NEJM attempts to sow fear, uncertainty & doubt into #opendata by calling secondary data users 'parasites' https:/…
RT @MMMarksman: If you use others data then you're a "parasite". Wow, can't even fathom how this stinker got to see the light of day https:…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @AdamEnglerUCSD: Since when does re-analyzing and interpreting someone else's large dataset make you a “research parasite?” #NEJM https:…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @KevinCarson1: At NEJM: Ppl who develop research findings w/o permission--what used to be called science--are "research parasites" https…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @KrisLaukens: So scientists reanalysing published data are #researchparasites ? Reproducible science needs more, not less. https://t.co/…
https://t.co/b5r908D6iA #researchparasites so no #openscience this is misguided, was it peer reviewed?
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @KordingLab: The New England Journal of Medicine would call many physicists "research parasites" - https://t.co/1RAnwVJhGj - data analys…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BilhartzMD: Ultimately, "sharing" data can be expected, but shouldn't be commanded https://t.co/rBoDUqPax3
RT @smvamosi: Heck of a week for editorials... #researchparasites #getyourheadoutofyouknowwhere https://t.co/7U90harvah
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…