↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacology of Itch

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Itch and Its Inhibition by Counter Stimuli.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Itch and Its Inhibition by Counter Stimuli.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Pharmacology of Itch
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44605-8_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-244604-1, 978-3-66-244605-8
Authors

Snyder, Lindsey M, Ross, Sarah E, Lindsey M. Snyder, Sarah E. Ross, Snyder, Lindsey M., Ross, Sarah E.

Abstract

Recent studies have made significant progress in the knowledge of how itch sensation is processed, especially the molecular identity of neurons involved in itch signaling, both in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord. Despite these advances, the organization of these neurons in dorsal spinal cord circuits and how they interact with other somatosensory modalities, such as pain or temperature, remain relatively unexplored. Recent work from our lab and others has begun to shed light on these questions and will be the focus of this chapter. Here we describe the discovery of B5-I neurons, a population of inhibitory interneurons that function to inhibit itch, and review the evidence that these neurons mediate the inhibition of itch by counter stimuli. These studies are helping to solve the long-standing question of why itch makes us scratch.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 29%
Neuroscience 3 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,333,503
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#394
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,960
of 353,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#42
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.