You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Measuring In-Air and Underwater Hearing in Seabirds
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 144 |
Book title |
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_144 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2980-1, 978-1-4939-2981-8
|
Authors |
Sara C. Crowell, Crowell, Sara C. |
Editors |
Arthur N. Popper, Anthony Hawkins |
Abstract |
Electrophysiological methods were used to measure the in-air hearing of 10 species of seabirds. There are currently no measures of the underwater hearing abilities of diving birds. In preparation for constructing a behavioral audiogram both in-air and underwater hearing, several species of diving ducks were raised. Because there is a considerable amount of literature on bird hearing in air, the technical setup and training methods were modeled on similar studies, with modifications to address the nature of the underwater sound field and the difficulty of the task for the birds. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Samoa | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
Scientists | 4 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,257,940
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#343
of 5,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,291
of 399,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#38
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.