Title |
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II
|
---|---|
Published by |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2980-1, 978-1-4939-2981-8
|
Authors |
Harris, Catriona M, Thomas, Len, Sadykova, Dina, DeRuiter, Stacy L, Tyack, Peter L, Southall, Brandon L, Read, Andrew J, Miller, Patrick J O, Nousek-McGregor, Anna E, Mei, Francesca Tee Liang, Lepper, Paul A, Robinson, Stephen P, Hayman, Gary, Robinson, Stephen, Lepper, Paul, Stansbury, Amanda, Deecke, Volker, Götz, Thomas, Janik, Vincent M, Garrett, Joanne K, Witt, Matthew J, Johanning, Lars, Stanley, Jenni A, Wilkens, Serena, McDonald, Justin I, Jeffs, Andrew G, Donovan, Carl, Harwood, John, King, Stephanie, Booth, Cormac, Caneco, Bruno, Walker, Cameron, Pine, Matthew K, Radford, Craig A, Radford, C A, Montgomery, J C, Schick, Robert S, Kraus, Scott D, Rolland, Rosalind M, Knowlton, Amy R, Hamilton, Philip K, Pettis, Heather M, Clark, James S |
Editors |
Arthur N. Popper, Anthony Hawkins |
Abstract |
This paper describes the MOCHA project which aims to develop novel approaches for the analysis of data collected during Behavioral Response Studies (BRSs). BRSs are experiments aimed at directly quantifying the effects of controlled dosages of natural or anthropogenic stimuli (typically sound) on marine mammal behavior. These experiments typically result in low sample size, relative to variability, and so we are looking at a number of studies in combination to maximize the gain from each one. We describe a suite of analytical tools applied to BRS data on beaked whales, including a simulation study aimed at informing future experimental design. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 16% |
United States | 14 | 14% |
Australia | 10 | 10% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Austria | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 74 | 74% |
Scientists | 18 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 3% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 2% |
Student > Master | 2 | <1% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | <1% |
Librarian | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 183 | 91% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 184 | 92% |