↓ Skip to main content

G Protein-Coupled Receptors - Modeling and Simulation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Structure and dynamics of g-protein coupled receptors.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Structure and dynamics of g-protein coupled receptors.
Chapter number 3
Book title
G Protein-Coupled Receptors - Modeling and Simulation
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7423-0_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-077422-3, 978-9-40-077423-0
Authors

Nagarajan Vaidehi, Supriyo Bhattacharya, Adrien B Larsen, Adrien B. Larsen, Vaidehi, Nagarajan, Bhattacharya, Supriyo, Larsen, Adrien B.

Abstract

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven helical transmembrane proteins that mediate cell-to-cell communication. They also form the largest superfamily of drug targets. Hence detailed studies of the three dimensional structure and dynamics are critical to understanding the functional role of GPCRs in signal transduction pathways, and for drug design. In this chapter we compare the features of the crystal structures of various biogenic amine receptors, such as β1 and β2 adrenergic receptors, dopamine D3 receptor, M2 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. This analysis revealed that conserved residues are located facing the inside of the transmembrane domain in these GPCRs improving the efficiency of packing of these structures. The NMR structure of the chemokine receptor CXCR1 without any ligand bound, shows significant dynamics of the transmembrane domain, especially the helical kink angle on the transmembrane helix6. The activation mechanism of the β2-adrenergic receptor has been studied using multiscale computational methods. The results of these studies showed that the receptor without any ligand bound, samples conformations that resemble some of the structural characteristics of the active state of the receptor. Ligand binding stabilizes some of the conformations already sampled by the apo receptor. This was later observed in the NMR study of the dynamics of human β2-adrenergic receptor. The dynamic nature of GPCRs leads to a challenge in obtaining purified receptors for biophysical studies. Deriving thermostable mutants of GPCRs has been a successful strategy to reduce the conformational heterogeneity and stabilize the receptors. This has lead to several crystal structures of GPCRs. However, the cause of how these mutations lead to thermostability is not clear. Computational studies are beginning to shed some insight into the possible structural basis for the thermostability. Molecular Dynamics simulations studying the conformational ensemble of thermostable mutants have shown that the stability could arise from both enthalpic and entropic factors. There are regions of high stress in the wild type GPCR that gets relieved upon mutation conferring thermostability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
United States 1 4%
India 1 4%
Unknown 20 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,351,676
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,296
of 4,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,288
of 305,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#88
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.