RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @MikePallaci: Great info as always from @srrezaie #COVID19 https://t.co/OBe6IKfcRx
Getting more complicated...
The epidemiologist in me is extremely bothered that we are using a PCR test with a questionable sensitivity to rule out disease. No? Its nots realistic to use ct on everyone. We need a better testing algorihm. https://t.co/jn8CydKVDg
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
@Rosee_bv @ScottGottliebMD He could CT them instead. More accurate than PCR test. Dosen’t need public health permission to do that surely https://t.co/gAz2go9dwx
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @pooya_mehr: Use CT Scan for screening instead of PCR? https://t.co/10ZTZJ0hEE
Estudio con 30% de pacientes con #COVID2019 negativo en la primera PCR, pero con imagen en el TC. Positiviza entre 1-7 días posteriores. Debemos aislar los pacientes graves con sospecha clínico-rx con PCR negativa y repetir PCR a los X y 7 días? @ToniTrill
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
Merci @srrezaie
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
Use CT Scan for screening instead of PCR? https://t.co/10ZTZJ0hEE
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
Hey @bier_goggles, one for your bio classes? Low sample size but raises interesting questions 👇 https://t.co/UscRY9Cfi0
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
RT @Corvin666: @RogueRad What are your thoughts on routine use of chest CT for screening? Eg like this: https://t.co/NaR4ycajOp
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
les dejo la revisión de hallazgos en tac de tórax y una resumen del COVID-19 escrito por julio Velasquez en nuestra página FOAM. https://t.co/JEeqoEA9Sh https://t.co/ypBVpLcm6T
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @Anggray77: @GregHuntMP #covid19australia This suggests 75% of ppl who swab negative had CoVID. The ones we’re not quarantining. Test…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @Anggray77: @GregHuntMP #covid19australia This suggests 75% of ppl who swab negative had CoVID. The ones we’re not quarantining. Test…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @shawnapandya: 😳😬😱 #COVID19
This is critically important. Suggests that sensitivity is quite poor, and new algorithm with better ROC is needed.
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
😳😬😱 #COVID19
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @First10EM: If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testin…
If the test is this bad - and the only value of the test is guiding isolation/quarantine - is there any value in even testing? Those results seem to indicate isolation efforts are doomed to fail https://t.co/FsRa0jlNXj
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
RT @srrezaie: In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Fin…
In pts w/ negative RT-PCR, 75% had positive chest CT findings (48% considered highly likely cases & 33% probable cases) Findings suggest if pts only tested with RT-PCR, & result is negative, they could be released to spread infection https://t.c
RT @grepmeded: @PulmCrit @iBookCC Few interesting articles on CT findings: Essentials for Radiologists: https://t.co/yuXUI9OFz9 Sensitivity…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
https://t.co/1Donyb87mh yeah seems like sensitivity is closer to ~0.7 for RT-PCR methods? This one doesn't mention which N-genes (?) though https://t.co/1Donyb87mh
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
RT @AbraarKaran: 6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that h…
6/ Multiple studies have shown CT scans have 97% sensitivity! This means if your CT scan is negative, your chance that have COVID19 is exceedingly low. This is why China doesn’t even swab you if your chest CT is negative. https://t.co/UjTSj20Dmi https
@T_T_Licca @KamiMasahiro https://t.co/s9lkUTyDNT 対象は武漢の病院で「発熱または何らかの呼吸器症状」のあった患者です。PCRの感度は71%、CTの感度は98%でした。PCRはウイルス量や手技の問題で偽陰性が出やすいのは容易に想像できます。
Not uninteresting: Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR https://t.co/lwr34Dwmag
RT @ryuhokataoka: メモ:胸部CT検査のほうが確実 Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR | Radiology https://t.co/MDSJsqk73Q
RT @ryuhokataoka: メモ:胸部CT検査のほうが確実 Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR | Radiology https://t.co/MDSJsqk73Q
RT @ryuhokataoka: メモ:胸部CT検査のほうが確実 Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR | Radiology https://t.co/MDSJsqk73Q
RT @ryuhokataoka: メモ:胸部CT検査のほうが確実 Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR | Radiology https://t.co/MDSJsqk73Q
メモ:胸部CT検査のほうが確実 Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR | Radiology https://t.co/MDSJsqk73Q
RT @HamadYaseen: لماذا يظل الشخص بالحجر لمدة ١٤ يوم حتى بعد الحصول على نتيجة سلبية لاختبار المسحة ؟ الإجابة: لان حساسية اختبار ال RT-PCR…
@realCarykh regarding this (https://t.co/gJdEUlfRzC) video, at 2:01 it is stated that CT scans are less rigorous than lab tests (RT-PCR). You should take a look at https://t.co/3OkrNe3g1e which suggests that the CT sensitivity is 98% compared to 71% for RT
@KamiMasahiro PCRの感度は71%に過ぎません。 一方胸部CTの感度は98%と報告されています。 https://t.co/s9lkUTyDNT 国内の市中肺炎症例でも、病初期からCTで所見を認めたと報告されています。 https://t.co/tpBJhBctt5 胸部CTならどこでも今すぐ撮れます。 PCRではなく胸部CTを推奨するべきです。
RT @HamadYaseen: لماذا يظل الشخص بالحجر لمدة ١٤ يوم حتى بعد الحصول على نتيجة سلبية لاختبار المسحة ؟ الإجابة: لان حساسية اختبار ال RT-PCR…
RT @HamadYaseen: لماذا يظل الشخص بالحجر لمدة ١٤ يوم حتى بعد الحصول على نتيجة سلبية لاختبار المسحة ؟ الإجابة: لان حساسية اختبار ال RT-PCR…
@RogueRad @GershonMD2019 @ericrobergemd @DanielaMartinMD @LucyModahlMD @RyanChristieMD @JeffreyKanneMD Papers for CT vs PCR #2 says "Our results support using chest CT to screen for COVID in patients with clinical and epidemiologic features compatible wit
RT @HamadYaseen: لماذا يظل الشخص بالحجر لمدة ١٤ يوم حتى بعد الحصول على نتيجة سلبية لاختبار المسحة ؟ الإجابة: لان حساسية اختبار ال RT-PCR…
RT @HamadYaseen: لماذا يظل الشخص بالحجر لمدة ١٤ يوم حتى بعد الحصول على نتيجة سلبية لاختبار المسحة ؟ الإجابة: لان حساسية اختبار ال RT-PCR…
RT @HamadYaseen: لماذا يظل الشخص بالحجر لمدة ١٤ يوم حتى بعد الحصول على نتيجة سلبية لاختبار المسحة ؟ الإجابة: لان حساسية اختبار ال RT-PCR…
RT @HamadYaseen: لماذا يظل الشخص بالحجر لمدة ١٤ يوم حتى بعد الحصول على نتيجة سلبية لاختبار المسحة ؟ الإجابة: لان حساسية اختبار ال RT-PCR…
RT @segawashin: 完全に出遅れてるんだろうけど、こんな論文が出ていることを知って衝撃を受けてしまった。コロナウイルス感染の診断にはRT-PCR (71%)よりも胸部CTのほうが感度が高い (98%)という内容なんだけど、1/19-2/4の短期間で50例集めて解析、…
RT @segawashin: 完全に出遅れてるんだろうけど、こんな論文が出ていることを知って衝撃を受けてしまった。コロナウイルス感染の診断にはRT-PCR (71%)よりも胸部CTのほうが感度が高い (98%)という内容なんだけど、1/19-2/4の短期間で50例集めて解析、…
RT @segawashin: 完全に出遅れてるんだろうけど、こんな論文が出ていることを知って衝撃を受けてしまった。コロナウイルス感染の診断にはRT-PCR (71%)よりも胸部CTのほうが感度が高い (98%)という内容なんだけど、1/19-2/4の短期間で50例集めて解析、…
@ali3alnasser هلا علي تفضل https://t.co/U56Q7BlOf4 و على جميعنا فخورين فيك و بعملك. موفق