You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Cloning whole bacterial genomes in yeast.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Gene Synthesis
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-564-0_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-563-3, 978-1-61779-564-0
|
| Authors |
Benders GA, Gwynedd A. Benders, Benders, Gwynedd A. |
| Abstract |
Many bacterial and archaeal genomes are of a similar size to molecules that have been cloned in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and thus might be clonable as single, circular episomes in this host. Yeast offers a variety of efficient tools for the manipulation and study of cloned DNA. One strategy to clone a genome in yeast is to cotransform yeast spheroplasts with the genome of interest and a linear yeast vector whose termini are homologous to a spot in the genome. Clones are selected on auxotrophic medium and then screened for completeness and size; they may also be sequenced. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,245,883
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,287
of 13,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,517
of 250,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#258
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.