RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
@fangshimin 不管论文是怎么翻译的,而是原论文的内容是错误的,但是依然被广泛传播。 https://t.co/cjwhoHAHKX
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/sMDNRu2tsi
【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学McDonald考古研究所Lucy Forster等。 https://t.co/30Xsxu1w2e
RT @ChrisStantis: There are a strange number of archaeologists on this paper 🧐 https://t.co/5BvxCAI0cV
RT @oopsie06020861: 美国科学院院刊,论文链接:https://t.co/FqrfGXlx3s
@SpokespersonCHN Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes Peter Forster, Lucy Forster, Colin Renfrew, and Michael Forster This is a phylogenetic network of SARS-CoV-2 genomes sampled from across the world. PNAS April 8, 2020 Proc.National Aca
RT @LarryBoorstein: @he_koh Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes Peter Forster, Lucy Forster, Colin Renfrew, and Michael Fo…
@he_koh Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes Peter Forster, Lucy Forster, Colin Renfrew, and Michael Forster This is a phylogenetic network of SARS-CoV-2 genomes sampled from across the world. PNAS April 8, 2020 Proc.National Academy of S
新型コロナウイルスの変異株の系統樹らしい。大きく分けて3タイプになるんだとか。https://t.co/sH8QL5ayOu 先日アイスランドの研究で最大40種類の変異株が見つかったと言ってたけどこれ見ると40どころじゃないような https://t.co/xZOwepK01K
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
#あとで読む Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS https://t.co/8CHS63b7Gx
Cambridgeの研究者の武漢ウイルスの種類のPNAS論文。コウモリに近いType-Aの感染者のうち、T系統の初期型は広東省の中国人に見られ進化型は米国人(武漢在住歴)と日本人にもいて、さらに進化したC系統の半数近くは米国や豪州人。 [紹介] https://t.co/SHL9CeKn6b [本文] https://t.co/YrWQrZsPwm 1/2
According to the analysis by these researchers, it is very POSSIBLE that China is not the origin. But still need more evidence is required to obtain the truth.@DrEricDing https://t.co/0WnqLr1dsC
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
美国科学院院刊,论文链接:https://t.co/FqrfGXlx3s
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes Peter Forster, Lucy Forster, Colin Renfrew, and Michael Forster This is a phylogenetic network of SARS-CoV-2 genomes sampled from across the world. PNAS April 8, 2020 Proc.National Academy of Sciences
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. According this analysis carried out by researchers from Univ. of Cambridge, the virus found in Wuhan is of type B which is derived from type A. Virus of type A is largely spread in USA. https://t.co/QOLi
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: More about that PNAS paper from @BallouxFrancois, who doesn't mince words and who, having co-authored in PNAS with Franci…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @BallouxFrancois: This paper is extraordinary, and not for its contribution to human knowledge. It epitomises many things that are deepl…
RT @santiagojsp7: This paper on #SARSCoV2 #Coronavirus #genomes is wrong at so many levels, I hardly know where to begin with. Let's start…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @matiasauquebaux: コロナウイルス2(SARS-Cov-2)のゲノム解析。A, B, Cと3種類見つかって、東アジアとヨーロッパだとどうやら違う。ヨーロッパで猛威を振るうCタイプは、中国本土では見つかってないらしい。Phylogenetic network…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
PNAS artical shows the root of COVID-19 is America and Australia. https://t.co/mT2GwI2d13
Bagay la depase nou si gentan gen 3 kategori e nou poko jwenn solisyon, mesye leve pye nou
RT @medel2020: Un sabroso comidillo sobre una red filogenética de Sars-Cov-2 publicado en PNAS.
The truth is about to emerge.
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
@susu_rbmyjl 这个是关于昨天那个文章的 https://t.co/lrccmjcHk5
RT @WoTouNMLNXBX: More solid papers and reports indicate : COVID-19 VIRUS origins from America Or EU. #AmericanVirus #originofCOVID19 #Amer…
RT @cshperspectives: Today in concerns about author-directed peer review...
RT @medel2020: Un sabroso comidillo sobre una red filogenética de Sars-Cov-2 publicado en PNAS. https://t.co/X969Ypzh4F
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
Un sabroso comidillo sobre una red filogenética de Sars-Cov-2 publicado en PNAS.
@QingboZheng @M8World @SpokespersonCHN A recent scientific article by cambridge professors found that COVID-19 was NOT originated from (published in PNAS) east asia! sourece:【Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS】https://t.co/RDqClMSS
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @VFcien: ¿Cómo se ha movido la pandemia desde el origen en términos de evolución viral? Este interesante artículo nos muestra un 'snapsh…
@NathanRichHGDW A recent scientific article by cambridge professors found that COVID-19 was NOT originated from (published in PNAS) east asia! sourece:【Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS】 https://t.co/RDqClMSS3y
@HuPing1 看了原文,没有美澳的A型更接近蝙蝠病毒的意思,只是说A型相对接近蝙蝠,而A型最早是在武汉发现的。《南方都市报》在造谣,故意误导国内读者。 论文链接在此,懂英文的朋友自己看。 https://t.co/9RjC6v6wiJ
RT @StuartJRitchie: Members of the National Academy of Sciences can "contribute" up to 2 papers/year to PNAS - they can choose reviewers an…
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
That's why I don't trust in "contributed" PNAS papers 🙄
RT @santiagojsp7: This paper on #SARSCoV2 #Coronavirus #genomes is wrong at so many levels, I hardly know where to begin with. Let's start…
Interesting thread giving an understanding of publications of deplorable standards
@SarahLiYi
RT @ssik08: This is exactly right! MJN is not a phylogenetic tool! See https://t.co/5kzO92gI44 @arambaut
RT @matiasauquebaux: コロナウイルス2(SARS-Cov-2)のゲノム解析。A, B, Cと3種類見つかって、東アジアとヨーロッパだとどうやら違う。ヨーロッパで猛威を振るうCタイプは、中国本土では見つかってないらしい。Phylogenetic network…
😱 https://t.co/96eoFLHdqj @PNASNews
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
This is exactly right! MJN is not a phylogenetic tool! See https://t.co/5kzO92gI44 @arambaut
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
@PNASNews 剑桥大学研究人员发表在《美国科学院院刊》(PANS)上一篇针对新冠病毒溯源(New Coronavirus Traceability)的研究发现,目前全球感染的新冠病毒实际上并非是同一种,而是变异分化成A、B、C三种类型,并且这三种类型的病毒在全球分布范围不同。https://t.co/Q0EGlfHk5a
@VOAChinese 请看刚发表在美国科学院的论文,你再考虑一下怎么说病毒起源哪里 https://t.co/ALMyBW9Apv 说病毒起源需要科学依据,不能你美国之音信口开河
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
The A and C types are found in significant proportions outside East Asia, that is, in Europeans and Americans. In contrast, the B type is the most common type in East Asia - Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS #coronavirus #COVIDー19
RT @santiagojsp7: This paper on #SARSCoV2 #Coronavirus #genomes is wrong at so many levels, I hardly know where to begin with. Let's start…
This paper on #SARSCoV2 #Coronavirus #genomes is wrong at so many levels, I hardly know where to begin with. Let's start with our review of Median-Joining Networks (MJNs) as a method for phylogenetic analysis @ssik08 👉https://t.co/6j1SIpo21p Thread 1/5
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/Q0EGlfHk5a
lha yen koronane rupo rupo koyo ngene bakalan mremen menyang endi endi ... vaksin nggo siji wae rung ketemu, opo meneh telu ... https://t.co/eVzYujjKSb
先日の英国の学者が発表して色々なメディアで報道された新型コロナウイルスの遺伝子の’研究は、多数の学者からかなりの批判を受けている模様。 利用した遺伝子データの数がとても少なかった(160?)点などっを含め、色々な問題が多いのだそうです。
@itsthePOLLguy @CNN @CNNOpinion is it really from China? This recent PNAS paper shows it might well origin from the US. https://t.co/V34E7DeYDw
ウイルスが人からどうヒトヒト感染していったをゲノム解析した報告書。やはり中国が中心ですよね。https://t.co/Np8dJgIm0k
WTH is COVID-19 really from: 🤔🤔🤔SHUT THE FUCK UP, YOU U.S. IDIOTS! https://t.co/ILmU2OwlBs
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/dWLyQrDueZ
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @danielcroll: I know how to download sequences and have used this network tool as an undergrad. Can I Haz A PNAS too?? #COVIDー19 https:…
RT @electricarchaeo: Why is Colin Renfrew an author on this, rather outside his wheelhouse,no?
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: More about that PNAS paper from @BallouxFrancois, who doesn't mince words and who, having co-authored in PNAS with Franci…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: So about that new PNAS paper....
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DNATimeTravel: I have my answer to a previous tweet about the sudden, unsustainable increase in scientific publications on #SARSCoV2 an…
怪不得川建国一口一个中国病毒,和习打完电话,立马改口了
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…