RT @danielcroll: I know how to download sequences and have used this network tool as an undergrad. Can I Haz A PNAS too?? #COVIDー19 https:…
RT @electricarchaeo: Why is Colin Renfrew an author on this, rather outside his wheelhouse,no?
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: More about that PNAS paper from @BallouxFrancois, who doesn't mince words and who, having co-authored in PNAS with Franci…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: So about that new PNAS paper....
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DNATimeTravel: I have my answer to a previous tweet about the sudden, unsustainable increase in scientific publications on #SARSCoV2 an…
怪不得川建国一口一个中国病毒,和习打完电话,立马改口了
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
Outgroups matter - Period!
RT @LucyvanDorp: Today’s PNAS paper https://t.co/iA9HcE1nAE, despite being widely denounced, has sparked many a headline including that the…
RT @DigitalV0rt3x: @c_drosten Hallo Hr. Drosten, konnten Sie bereits diesen Bericht lesen? https://t.co/IJKR6oCpbu Mich würde Ihre Einschä…
Two cycles of natural selections First in animals. Second in humans.
A recent scientific article by cambridge professors found that COVID-19 was NOT originated from (published in PNAS) east asia! sourece:【Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS】https://t.co/RDqClMSS3y
@ChinaDaily BREAKING about COVID-19: Virus mutate form A to B then to C. https://t.co/eoZNmMMnYK
RT @dixy0: Thread 👇
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
More solid papers and reports indicate : COVID-19 VIRUS origins from America Or EU. #AmericanVirus #originofCOVID19 #AmericaLies https://t.co/eoZNmMMnYK
RT @paleoTsimoes: Poor phylogenetics has real implications
RT @firefoxx66: It is really heartening & inspiring to see so many scientists working so hard & so openly on #COVID19 #SARSCoV2 It's really…
This is consistent with the results of the Japanese study
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
The ROOT of the #CoronavirusOutbreak @WSJ @washingtonpost @nytimes @cnnbrk @CGTNOfficial @FoxNews @business @SCMPNews @TheEconomist @sfchronicle @Forbes
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
RT @trinafang: @ABC See the paper from University of Cambridge. Then you will know where the virus comes from! https://t.co/WIYMJFEcrX
@zero132132 Well given the limited space of a tweet, I guess it's easiest to sum it up with, https://t.co/HtHnfqwDNE
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
@FutEnFol @ostralopithec @Fabri934 Covid19 : 3 variantes identifiées et une émergence mi-septembre 2019 selon des chercheurs https://t.co/DO6KHPNrx1 Source https://t.co/vETAz6yPJz Avez-vous eu la détention de ce virus bien plus tôt pour vos études @oyagaaa
Obviously, the covid19 was originated from America. Many scientists have proved this. Trump and American media want to politicize the virus and blame it to China. @wsj,@cnn Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/EUdgXppegl
原文地址:https://t.co/Dd22MGUAUe 论文今天发表在PNAS (美国科学院院刊),论文链接:https://t.co/YhTmOHXTen
This thread makes for an interesting read. @AllisonGroup @TheChandraGroup
RT @LAevolving: Omg a PNAS paper is apparently based entirely on re-visualizing the #covid19 genome data as a haplotype network instead of…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: More about that PNAS paper from @BallouxFrancois, who doesn't mince words and who, having co-authored in PNAS with Franci…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
@paulbcarroll Just in, for example. https://t.co/l17bi4nvPp
RT @matiasauquebaux: コロナウイルス2(SARS-Cov-2)のゲノム解析。A, B, Cと3種類見つかって、東アジアとヨーロッパだとどうやら違う。ヨーロッパで猛威を振るうCタイプは、中国本土では見つかってないらしい。Phylogenetic network…
Really PNAS I applied a little sourced methodology to this paper, disappointed that you published it. https://t.co/9CKgdItSZK
Top #tweeted story in #bioscience: Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS https://t.co/57u3u3vq3g, see more https://t.co/kME3G1o122
@Yangche58313067 @HuXijin_GT More fuel for the fire. https://t.co/l0DDCsBZbj
It’s worse than I thought...
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/1d06uVdUtj
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/909oxxrLkD
Poor phylogenetics has real implications
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS https://t.co/tSEVWkbYaT
@chrismartenson Three COVID-19 strains? Interesting mutations and the possible consequences for specific populations https://t.co/gNOVSmsMe7
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @shi_huang5: "Wuhan B-type virus is immunologically or environmentally adapted to a large section of the East Asian population" garbage…
RT @shi_huang5: "Wuhan B-type virus is immunologically or environmentally adapted to a large section of the East Asian population" garbage…
"Wuhan B-type virus is immunologically or environmentally adapted to a large section of the East Asian population" garbage in garbage out. Seq under selection is garbage that must be filtered out for phylogenetics. These authors should have known better ht
RT @ActionDove: 二、原文地址:https://t.co/jxb50Y0pKT 论文今天发表在PNAS (美国科学院院刊),论文链接:https://t.co/ccuKF1rseM
WTF. Dude. Stay the fuck in your lane. Now is not the time. https://t.co/vURVD5LTKC
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
@RichardAntWal @RT_com A recent research by Cambrige finds that China may not be the origin place. https://t.co/33t7Ik6Yzk
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
RT @ActionDove: 二、原文地址:https://t.co/jxb50Y0pKT 论文今天发表在PNAS (美国科学院院刊),论文链接:https://t.co/ccuKF1rseM
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @StuartJRitchie: Members of the National Academy of Sciences can "contribute" up to 2 papers/year to PNAS - they can choose reviewers an…
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
RT @KaplanBen_Fr: Souches A, B et C du #SARSCoV2 : "Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes" Peter Forster, Lucy Forster, Colin…
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @ActionDove: 二、原文地址:https://t.co/jxb50Y0pKT 论文今天发表在PNAS (美国科学院院刊),论文链接:https://t.co/ccuKF1rseM
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @ChrisStantis: There are a strange number of archaeologists on this paper 🧐 https://t.co/5BvxCAI0cV
Still unsure how this warrants a PNAS publication
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
This research suggests that the genome variants of the #SARSCoV2 virus found typically in American and European cases appear earlier on the evolutionary tree than the the variant found in China and other Eastern Asian countries: https://t.co/bXbJDI9ZuR #co
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
RT @CT_Bergstrom: More about that PNAS paper from @BallouxFrancois, who doesn't mince words and who, having co-authored in PNAS with Franci…
RT @AMarkWalker: An example of what may happen if we abandon peer review more generally.
RT @LigoxygakisLab: Read this thread very carefully. In the times we live in, unscrupulous and just plain wrong scientific publishing about…
RT @AMarkWalker: An example of what may happen if we abandon peer review more generally. https://t.co/FbEMPmStKN
@DrTedros What's your opinion on this? https://t.co/Wy7N6dwX21
進化学的な系統分析も進んでいるようですね。以下によると、3種160系統!現在流行しているのはヨーロッパで凶悪化したものか。人類の叡智で敵の姿も少しずつ見えてきたか。 https://t.co/vEmD8KjCR4
data based: covid19 is US originated
¿Cómo se publicó esto en una revista de gran prestigio? Porque uno de los autores es miembro de la Academia y puede "comunicar" su propio trabajo. ¿Pero qué hay de los revisores? OMG! 🙃