@catcontentonly Hi could you look into this and spread it to ur US friends? Its about an article recently published on PNAS. It could be an evidence of the origin of this virus not from China. Thx https://t.co/YyAYH1YVax
@raoult_didier Did you differentiate between the three subtypes of the SARS-CoV-2 ? https://t.co/jfYioji8D2 #Covid19
RT @mateo_tao: There are three variants of the Human SARS-Cov-2 viruses. Three central variants distinguished by amino acid changes, which…
Trochę nauki Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/ahkWsFYE6m
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @BalibreaJose: Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes could be used to help trace undocumented COVID-19 infection sources,…
@hisotalus Also the paper itself has several issues: https://t.co/rXo3MwG2qe
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @dealowack: @influenzer3 この論文はいろんなところが残念.. 説明はこのツイートに https://t.co/SRAtPDTce5
“Interesting article on coronavirus strains - A high level overview in metro https://t.co/Ljp69lu3yy But here's the original paper: https://t.co/2PVAVjFzOK https://t.co/9wnAf9Nj9q
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
コロナウィルスって主にABCの3タイプあるんか・・・ https://t.co/TrBMK4Xh4P 欧米で流行ってる突然変異のCタイプがやばい。 日本でもいつこのCタイプが流行るかわからないのと、変異して拡散してからでは遅いのだからその前に個々が責任を持った行動をとる事が本当に大事。 https://t.co/ep5EEu65h0
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
RT @SebBdl: https://t.co/5yUbzq50sj Publicaciones actuales muestran direfentes cepas de virus, pero no hablan de mayor o menor mortalidad,…
RT @melanie_matheu: 100 strains of the virus have been identified. Code is open sourced. @subC0smos want to see if, where, and how anything…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: So about that new PNAS paper....
100 strains of the virus have been identified. Code is open sourced. @subC0smos want to see if, where, and how anything in the spike proteins have shifted? 9pm-3am collaborative investigation time? https://t.co/f5J12vz271
Very enlightening research
RT @danielcroll: I know how to download sequences and have used this network tool as an undergrad. Can I Haz A PNAS too?? #COVIDー19 https:…
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
RT @LucyvanDorp: Today’s PNAS paper https://t.co/iA9HcE1nAE, despite being widely denounced, has sparked many a headline including that the…
RT @danielcroll: I know how to download sequences and have used this network tool as an undergrad. Can I Haz A PNAS too?? #COVIDー19 https:…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
@HuajinBioLib Read this https://t.co/jKqmtOql69
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
@influenzer3 この論文はいろんなところが残念.. 説明はこのツイートに https://t.co/SRAtPDTce5
科学证明
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @rnomics: Top @RNomics #tweeted story: Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS https://t.co/57u3u3vq3g, see more http…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/gwyBxb8OkG
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
@Aguyyouknow2 @sunxiu1 @letrang56467780 @WHO Save Americans!! They are dying!!https://t.co/bNlAUuod0H
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
Top @RNomics #tweeted story: Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes | PNAS https://t.co/57u3u3vq3g, see more https://t.co/mx2YzvfCax
@SebBdl @paulcarald @elcomerciocom @USFQ_Ecuador Hay críticas MUY duras sobre el paper de PNAS pero estoy de acuerdo, no hay evidencia robusta para diferentes tasas de mortalidad entre linajes de SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/PgFtk0YlVv
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
RT @robertlufkinmd: Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networ…
RT @lipsandskin: Aus der Originalstudie (https://t.co/31ZIOtNYjp). Was sagen Sie dazu, @c_drosten? https://t.co/KYsTN9X0Au
Three forms of #COVID19 virus based on genomic analysis of 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Character-based #phylogenetic networks allows reconstruction of their #evolutionary paths and ancestral genome. We need bigger numbers but it's a good start. https://t.co/YY
真相可能越来越近了!只有科学家是公正的,A类病毒是原始病毒,来自美澳。The truth may be getting closer!Only scientists are impartial!Type A virus is the original virus, is found in USA! 中英文翻译: https://t.co/nZJ4nBaUZE #COVID2019 原文链接,The link: https://t.co/LATG7CP0Et
RT @LyaCoronation: ۱ مطالعاتی که چاپ شده نشون داده از لحاظ فیلوژنی تا کنون سه سویه کروناویروس موجوده، که نوع A جد دو سویه B و C هست و بیشتر…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
詳しく読んでないけど、やはりヨーロッパとかアメリカとアジアでは、新型コロナの型が違う様子。 https://t.co/lI8lk4r9Cp
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @matiasauquebaux: コロナウイルス2(SARS-Cov-2)のゲノム解析。A, B, Cと3種類見つかって、東アジアとヨーロッパだとどうやら違う。ヨーロッパで猛威を振るうCタイプは、中国本土では見つかってないらしい。Phylogenetic network…
RT @lipsandskin: Aus der Originalstudie (https://t.co/31ZIOtNYjp). Was sagen Sie dazu, @c_drosten? https://t.co/KYsTN9X0Au
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @pathogenomenick: PNAS .. how far you done fall https://t.co/k1jApmrsON
RT @quipupe: Hace unos días apareció un artículo en PNAS, una revista considerada top para muchos de nosotros. El artículo usa muchas secue…
@LionsDen45 https://t.co/epHjitGjp6 maybe University of Cambridge is also controlled by CCP.Oh,maybe you don’t understand science because you only have ideology and shit in your mind.Try to read it baby
RT @SebBdl: https://t.co/5yUbzq50sj Publicaciones actuales muestran direfentes cepas de virus, pero no hablan de mayor o menor mortalidad,…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/XOUY9UxP9R
@paulcarald @veronicab1527 @IMUSFQ
@Larrypolya22 @RealJamesWoods https://t.co/epHjitGjp6 this link is English, so maybe you will understand it using your broken brain. Who lies?virus from Wuhan lab? 憨批
https://t.co/5yUbzq50sj Publicaciones actuales muestran direfentes cepas de virus, pero no hablan de mayor o menor mortalidad, a falta de evidencia cientifica. @elcomerciocom @USFQ_Ecuador @paulcarald #informacion
To summarize, *no contagion*. As Muslims we've believed & been saying this for more than 1400+ years. Do not conflate the actions of the hypocrites among us as the actions one ought to have as Muslim. That said, Covid-19 is not a pandemic/plague, it
坐看吃瓜
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @influenzer3: →原著論文は以下です。 Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/0o0xhCPz5e ・世界から分離されたSARS-CoV-2の遺伝子配列から系統樹解析を…
Fuente original: https://t.co/WZAw7VgACo
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
@c_drosten Hallo Hr. Drosten, konnten Sie bereits diesen Bericht lesen? https://t.co/IJKR6oCpbu Mich würde Ihre Einschätzung interessieren, gerne auch im nächsten Podcast. Das würde ja bedeuten, dass alles doch früher begonnen hat als angenommen, oder irr
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @quipupe: Hace unos días apareció un artículo en PNAS, una revista considerada top para muchos de nosotros. El artículo usa muchas secue…
@dockaurG @JustinTrudeau @CPHO_Canada if you read into this article, you might think vaccine is mission impossible. https://t.co/HaXTWaHBrc
RT @quipupe: Hace unos días apareció un artículo en PNAS, una revista considerada top para muchos de nosotros. El artículo usa muchas secue…
RT @SearodLiu: This is a new research work performed by researchers from University of Cambridge, which is published in PNAS: https://t.co/…
Phylogenetic network analysis points to US as most likely COVID19 origin >>> It is noteworthy that nearly half (15/33) of the types in this subcluster, however, are found outside East Asia, mainly in the United States and Australia.> https://t
RT @EvoDivMet: Ojo, los científicos también deben de ser cuestionados críticamente, por todos, pero en especial por otros científicos. La c…
Notice that 3 out of 4 authors have the same surname. And 5 out of the 9 references are from the same authors of the study. https://t.co/8UF6W2zkcC https://t.co/lTENZvZqlj
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
RT @danielcroll: I know how to download sequences and have used this network tool as an undergrad. Can I Haz A PNAS too?? #COVIDー19 https:…
Bu çalışmalar neticesinde virüsün 2019 Eylül yada Aralık ayının ilk günlerinde hayvandan insana geçtiği tahmin ediliyor. 📌Virüsle alakalı son çalışmalara ait Ulusal Bilimler Akademisi raporu 👇 https://t.co/E7jZXMT1qQ
RT @DadingLi: 【美国国家科学院院刊: SARS-CoV-2 基因遗传路径分析】 已经peer review的这篇研报其实证实了中科院郁文斌和川崎数据两篇研报的结论:新冠病毒大概率起源于欧美。 作者是德国慕尼黑遗传法医研究所Peter Forster,剑桥大学M…
Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes https://t.co/aEyCfS58vO
RT @LucyvanDorp: Today’s PNAS paper https://t.co/iA9HcE1nAE, despite being widely denounced, has sparked many a headline including that the…
RT @LAevolving: Omg a PNAS paper is apparently based entirely on re-visualizing the #covid19 genome data as a haplotype network instead of…
RT @LAevolving: Omg a PNAS paper is apparently based entirely on re-visualizing the #covid19 genome data as a haplotype network instead of…
@Charlotte3003G And this https://t.co/CFYHT7kgwU
可以看看这帖子对剑桥这位遗传与考古研究员文章的评价。