RT @Vadeboncoeur_Al: @JohntheLyricist I guess she refers to this. https://t.co/qxbvZwji7g She got an "attitude" that is absolutely not sc…
Anyone remember when @realDonaldTrump said hydroxychloroquine works on covid, and suddenly a paper came out saying it didn't work? The media, docs & government cheered. It was short lived, when the paper had to be retracted for BS data. LOL! https://
@JohntheLyricist Here you go. I remember doctors and pharmacists flaunting the original paper in my face when it first came out. Then, when the authors couldn't/wouldn't show us where they got the data, it was over. That's how corrupt they can be. https
RT @Vadeboncoeur_Al: @JohntheLyricist I guess she refers to this. https://t.co/qxbvZwji7g She got an "attitude" that is absolutely not sc…
@JohntheLyricist I think it’s the opposite conclusion she was trying to make, though. https://t.co/yz3TcLPrR5
@JohntheLyricist I guess she refers to this. https://t.co/qxbvZwji7g She got an "attitude" that is absolutely not scientific.
@RogerSeheult @elonmusk Fair enough. But what about the Surgisphere Study? Who would possibly be behind it? https://t.co/oWFIPx3giF
RT @ItsFatherNate: @jasonwoody @ValeriaLovene @bruceH56 This one stings a little I’m sure. The most trusted medical journals were corrupted…
@jasonwoody @ValeriaLovene @bruceH56 This one stings a little I’m sure. The most trusted medical journals were corrupted in the name of big pharma. This is the lancet in one of their many retractions on ivermectin and hcq. Of course After the damage was al
@PriyankaPulla @lega_jean @Banjotkaur @RPrasad12 Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis via @FRuschitzka et al https://t.co/JySw91OH64
@artofyoann @Cach_cash22 @ChatSecouriste Oui bien sûr. Tout votre blabla est juste disqualifie par un simple lien du .... Lancet. https://t.co/sPIZYkMo8D Bien-sûr, cette étude avait été validé par les pairs jusqu'à ce que l'on découvre qu'il.n'y a que
@ludovico147 @SkepticJonGuy You mean high impact Journals like the Lancet that published fake studies on Hydroxychloroquine? (Here's a hint, it doesn't make any money for Big Pharma so they lied about it until they got caught). https://t.co/las6XmiHb4
@thehealthb0t Mehra 'Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis.' 𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗘𝗗 https://t.co/rNGGl2IMme
@EricBillyFR Bjr M @EricBillyFR ceci en lien ci-dessous était "fakenews" et vous y avez mordu tel le brochet sur l'hameçon, une information qui restera accrochée à la bouche des soit-disant sages https://t.co/PP5UjL4m75 voulez-vous un monde sans dialog
@trazzlepops @annallan72 https://t.co/Sy5emUfRBx Found it. Wasn’t hard. Bot
@Me_xNL @rudybouma @NVVC_ Zeuren over teruggetrokken studies: Nederlands HCQ-beleid was gebasseerd op een teruggetrokken studie. https://t.co/KV2uPAe2Hi
@TheChiefNerd @KenPaxtonTX What could still be interesting would be to find out who sponsored the “famous” hydroxychloroquine study that was based on false data and that claimed that hydroxychloroquine was useless as treatment for Covid. https://t.co/hnq
@Bartjeisnietgek @ryk_sr @JeroenPols @MarionKoopmans @robelens En Marion. Ze antwoordt niet…
@MarionKoopmans Marion, kun je dit debunken: Was jij lid van de raad van advies van The Lancet, toen daar het volledig uit de duim gezogen stuk over HCQ geplaatst werd? Het stuk dat daarna teruggetrokken is. https://t.co/EJ3iPyVRuk https://t.co/aOUaNazA1y
@LevreroAnne @lonnibesancon "c'est pas là ou l'actrice porno a publié un article rétracté ensuite" Ah une actrice porno a publié dans The Lancet ? Une actrice porno parmi les co-auteurs ? Ce niveau de bêtise abyssal ! https://t.co/QkL3AerOXU https://t.
@pjvanerp @KlaasvanDijk5 Doet me denken aan mijn collega in Zürich. Werd auteur van een paper dat compleet gefaked was (link beneden). Maar bovenstaande data zijn echt. @pjvanerp verdedigt pseudowetenschap, ik verdedig wetenschap. https://t.co/KXBWuUEkPV
@spilkommen @jonathanstea You just can't handle the truth. You just want credible sources like the Lancet, who allow obviously fake papers to get HCQ banned. https://t.co/4xOPjX8GcN
RT @PatOMartin9: @Annette_LEXA Le LancetGate, le jour où la science est devenue $cience avec la plus grande fraude de l'Histoire orchestrée…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forni…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forni…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forni…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forni…
RT @PatOMartin9: @Annette_LEXA Le LancetGate, le jour où la science est devenue $cience avec la plus grande fraude de l'Histoire orchestrée…
RT @PatOMartin9: @Annette_LEXA Le LancetGate, le jour où la science est devenue $cience avec la plus grande fraude de l'Histoire orchestrée…
RT @PatOMartin9: @Annette_LEXA Le LancetGate, le jour où la science est devenue $cience avec la plus grande fraude de l'Histoire orchestrée…
@Annette_LEXA Le LancetGate, le jour où la science est devenue $cience avec la plus grande fraude de l'Histoire orchestrée par Big Pharma https://t.co/XWzWNh9oB4 #NiPardonNiOubli https://t.co/yKMUPz6r0E
@Artemizia_123 @ichudov Remember the LancetGate due to Surgisphere Corp. to kill HCQ. Fallacious Lancet paper after retraction: https://t.co/bRZA50B6DN
@MartinZ_uncut Une actrice X qui a coordonnée la publi fallacieuse du Lancet, faut pas pousser Dr Zizi, ou alors la science a bien changé :) https://t.co/bRZA50B6DN Par contre que dites-vous de cette publi rétractée de Patel, Desai, Mehrah sur l'IVM ? http
@metallimoi @SophiePascal2 @AnthoBvs @pelikolio @sergiodde Pourquoi ALORS le Lancet Gates? Et la décision irrévocable qui a découlé immédiatement, dans le week end en France puis à l'OMS ou en même temps. https://t.co/OznDK4bDRx
RT @FreeMIN24465256: @rasovski_bob @Drmartyufml @ordre_medecins Aucun hôpital Français ne rapport ces chiffres. Vous avez trouvé ces chiff…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: @rasovski_bob @Drmartyufml @ordre_medecins Aucun hôpital Français ne rapport ces chiffres. Vous avez trouvé ces chiff…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: @rasovski_bob @Drmartyufml @ordre_medecins Aucun hôpital Français ne rapport ces chiffres. Vous avez trouvé ces chiff…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: @rasovski_bob @Drmartyufml @ordre_medecins Aucun hôpital Français ne rapport ces chiffres. Vous avez trouvé ces chiff…
@rasovski_bob @Drmartyufml @ordre_medecins Aucun hôpital Français ne rapport ces chiffres. Vous avez trouvé ces chiffres dans le même tas d'étude qui a été retiré du Lancet ? L'étude qui avait été faite par une prostituée ? https://t.co/sPIZYkMo8D
@GenoVeno73 @DC_Draino Wow! Wait till you find out how that fraudulent study was done that they used to discredit HCQ. Then you’ll understand why “The Lancet” had do this retraction. https://t.co/r4qlzm5Uyn
@s_m_marandi @ejmalrai Remember Retraction about Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine: https://t.co/IcqPIvD1Ci
@michaelpsenger President Trump was right about hydroxychloroquine! https://t.co/IZdCf7STC0 https://t.co/bIPIXSSH2m
RT @jeremyfaust: In an important moment for science and data transparency, @thelancet announces that its 96,000 observational study on hydr…
@drjohnhmiller @JatinderHayre_ @bmj_latest @HelenRSalisbury BMJ > The Lancet BMJ has balls https://t.co/P7RowmOXKz Not that junior drs read literature...they just blindly follow guidelines They missed this https://t.co/rNec0idKiU Had they not, maybe
@BOROWSKIMIKE Etudes du docteur McKinsey, comme celle sur l'hydro. https://t.co/UaKodkJd0j
RT @ChanceGardiner: 5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forni…
RT @ChanceGardiner: 5. Il 5 giugno i coautori Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka e Amit Patel, si accorgono "improvvisamente" che i dati forni…
@WomanEncircled @BagaiDr @__philipn__ Fake phony fraud “studies” demonized HCQ https://t.co/uYRvigpNvV
RT @vieil_garde_ph: PS ne jamais oublier... ce qui est écrit est écrit ! Poke @EricBillyFR and all nofakemed https://t.co/b5Kzqji8ap pou…
RT @vieil_garde_ph: PS ne jamais oublier... ce qui est écrit est écrit ! Poke @EricBillyFR and all nofakemed https://t.co/b5Kzqji8ap pou…
PS ne jamais oublier... ce qui est écrit est écrit ! Poke @EricBillyFR and all nofakemed https://t.co/b5Kzqji8ap pour la postérité et l'histoire de la médecine, un ministre de la santé, M @olivierveran y a fait référence sans douter un quelconque instan
@louisaclary I remember that very well. https://t.co/V1vGryqebS
RT @FrijnsRik: @veen_els Weet je dat @MarionKoopmans lid van de raad van advies was toen het fake artikel over HCQ is geplaatst in the Lanc…
RT @FrijnsRik: @veen_els Weet je dat @MarionKoopmans lid van de raad van advies was toen het fake artikel over HCQ is geplaatst in the Lanc…
RT @FrijnsRik: @veen_els Weet je dat @MarionKoopmans lid van de raad van advies was toen het fake artikel over HCQ is geplaatst in the Lanc…
RT @FrijnsRik: @veen_els Weet je dat @MarionKoopmans lid van de raad van advies was toen het fake artikel over HCQ is geplaatst in the Lanc…
RT @FrijnsRik: @veen_els Weet je dat @MarionKoopmans lid van de raad van advies was toen het fake artikel over HCQ is geplaatst in the Lanc…
@veen_els Weet je dat @MarionKoopmans lid van de raad van advies was toen het fake artikel over HCQ is geplaatst in the Lancet? Later is het artikel retracted. https://t.co/EJ3iPyVRuk https://t.co/RTZ8dsOJDM
RT @norman_pilon: @Roper_Lab @rikirikiroo @JohnBeaudoinSr @AskDrDrew @DrBMcDH @drdrew @Kevin_McKernan @NestCommander The prestigious Lancet…
@Roper_Lab @rikirikiroo @JohnBeaudoinSr @AskDrDrew @DrBMcDH @drdrew @Kevin_McKernan @NestCommander The prestigious Lancet, eh. The journal that censored this preprint, "https://t.co/DJMbByr2VY," but had no problem quickly accepting and publishing this trav
@mol_marcel @KAFKA_Dev En de mensen die deze studie falsificeerden waardoor een verbod op hcq werd ingevoerd wat na retractie niet teruggedraaid werd ? Wat moeten we daarmee? https://t.co/h0uggWYybQ
@ELomaker @KAFKA_Dev Dat is oa door deze publicatie al gedaan. Door de door velen de hemel ingeprezen medici: https://t.co/h0uggWY0mi
@PPutjesschepper @KAFKA_Dev Idd ....ze publiceren gefalsificeerde onderzoeken in the Lancet: https://t.co/h0uggWY0mi Woehahahs
@Rinus2323 @KAFKA_Dev Dat waren wél degenen die het , uiteindelijk teruggetrokken onderzoek hebven opgezet om hcq verbod te verkrijgen : https://t.co/h0uggWY0mi Diegenen waren charlatans!!
@lilybeth53 @KAFKA_Dev Lees dit. Gefalsificeerd onderzoek..daarop werd besloten hcq te verbieden. https://t.co/h0uggWY0mi Ondanks terugtrekking werd verbod niet teruggedraaid!
@TruthGPTBot @KAFKA_Dev Oh yezz....based on falsified studies: https://t.co/h0uggWY0mi 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@FCPolleke @KAFKA_Dev Lees dit ...the Guardian heeft ook artikel erover. Nadat het werd teruggetrokken is het verbod op hcq niet teruggedraaid. Patientendatabase was volledig gefalsificeerd voor gewenste resultaat. Rechter toetst alleen de wet... lees
@Arilex @KAFKA_Dev Middels de gewraakte Surgisphere study is dat begin 2020 goed gelukt. En ondanks retraction werd het verbod niet teruggedraaid!!!https://t.co/h0uggWY0mi
@ExplainThisBean @KAFKA_Dev De medische wereld liet zich leiden door de " Surgisphere study " in the Lancet. Na 14 dagen teruggetrokken omdat het volledig vervalst was om hcq af te kraken. WHO trapte blindelings er in. En RIVM ook incluis jij. https
Sobre o the Lancet fica tudo dito com a retração em 2020... https://t.co/MoVpesPuC8
RT @askwhymoreoften: @asimpleplan1 @jonathanstea This lancet ? https://t.co/7xQhV2mHuv
@asimpleplan1 @jonathanstea This lancet ? https://t.co/7xQhV2mHuv
@Mattsy117 @mrduder @DefiantLs I totally agree with you, it's criminal to post false data. The issue is that such thing isn't crimininalized anymore, if it was the authors of a false study on HCQ would be in jail right now. They're not. https://t.co/DYNk
@MarioNawfal Or what about these fools! They’re cardiologist! https://t.co/xk7bK2GUtz
@thereal_truther @stkirsch @RealWayneRoot You "believe in" peer reviewed studies? Something like this? https://t.co/mJ4vOKQ3St These "several concerns" were a bold fraud by Surgisphere that was uncovered by about 100 scientists within days of publication.
Imagine a top medical journal RETRACTING a FABRICATED PAPER undermining use of an EFFECTIVE off-label drug to treat SARS infections. If an effective therapeutic existed to stop infection, they could NOT issue an EUA for the mRNA Jabs. No $$$ 4 Pharma h
@IanCopeland5 @stkirsch @Jikkyleaks @RobertFKennedyr @joerogan Hi Chief - can you please rate Lancet after they published an obvious hit piece that would not have made it into a high school science fair? https://t.co/tpqdx7lBCZ
@realJoeGigs @AaronSiriSG Because the authors wouldn't make their full datasets and audit results available for examination. https://t.co/fQhAepWjwM
@TuckerCarlson Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or ... https://t.co/5NDENj8G5b
@ThreeQueensDown @tylerblack32 They literally canceled the. Cheap drugs at work so they can get a 100 billion dollars. https://t.co/o2NC6rRVrw
@PeterHotez @ScienceMagazine @hholdenthorp The Lancit used (( False data ))to cancel drug that worked for covid 19!! Oh what fake science won't do to get ~EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION~ AND MAKE 100 BILLION Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or ... https://t.c
@kenul1_ken @FenixAmmunition peer review over anything to do with covid was politicized fraud. from the fictitious HCQ dataset to journals refusing to publish the Danmask study https://t.co/QCG9A05Ywq https://t.co/OInIfERdsU
@JordanChariton In May of 2020 the media gleefully proclaimed hydroxychloroquine was killing people - the Sturgis study was retracted - you can see it here - @RobertKennedyJr is telling the truth https://t.co/pM94b7e443
RT @RealCowPatty: @richardursomd @Carbongate We remember when they released the study on Hydroxychloroquine as not a treatment for Covid an…
RT @RealCowPatty: @richardursomd @Carbongate We remember when they released the study on Hydroxychloroquine as not a treatment for Covid an…
RT @RealCowPatty: @richardursomd @Carbongate We remember when they released the study on Hydroxychloroquine as not a treatment for Covid an…
RT @RealCowPatty: @richardursomd @Carbongate We remember when they released the study on Hydroxychloroquine as not a treatment for Covid an…
@richardursomd @Carbongate We remember when they released the study on Hydroxychloroquine as not a treatment for Covid and then redacted the article with an apology. Not trusted and obviously following along with WHO and NAID along with the new world reset
RT @newprayermewan: qpost#=4409 2020-06-05 06:45:35 UTC+0100 https://t.co/h7SqzCsUyV メディアと[民主党] の[知っていながら][連携した]特定の役員が '医学的に検証可能な' 新型コロナウィル…
RT @newprayermewan: qpost#=4409 2020-06-05 06:45:35 UTC+0100 https://t.co/h7SqzCsUyV メディアと[民主党] の[知っていながら][連携した]特定の役員が '医学的に検証可能な' 新型コロナウィル…
RT @heg_emon: This retraction by @TheLancet will NOT undo the damage. They suppressed good therapy for political reasons. So many lives we…