RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
PFİZER., VB KURULUŞLARIN COVID-19 VİRÜSÜNE KARŞI KULLANILAN AŞILAR, İLAÇLAR ÜZERİNE LANCET'TE YAYINLANAN BİR ÇOK YAZIYA İTİRAZ ETTİM.. ÇÜNKÜ BİLİMSEL ÇALIŞMALARIN ÜRÜNÜ DEĞİLDİLER.! HYDROXYCHLOROGUİNE.. mRNA VE DİĞER AŞILAR GİBİ KAN HÜCRELERİNE ZARAR VERİY
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis - The Lancet https://t.co/gZFyR9rO3X
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
Never forget!
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
RT @KathMLee1: @Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that…
@Parsifaler Ah yes! The same Lancet that published a fake hit piece on Hydroxychloroquine..... People need to remember that https://t.co/ijOmBPmH9z
En temps normal, des histoires telles que le scandale de Surgisphere n'auraient pas un grand impact. Dans des périodes comme celle-ci, un article peut être publié ou preprint rapidement et avoir un impact mondial immédiat sur les politiques de santé. 5/n h
RT @lonnibesancon: While, in normal times, stories such as the Surgisphere scandal would not have a great impact, in times like these, a pa…
While, in normal times, stories such as the Surgisphere scandal would not have a great impact, in times like these, a paper can be published or preprinted fast and have an almost immediate worldwide impact on health policies. 5/n https://t.co/2K7jJnrlYX
@BillWatterson6 @TimothyRMcNall2 @UsaPete2 $$$$ agenda just like Big Pharma????😂🤣😂 https://t.co/V7QjVYwtnG
@TrumpIsACreep @alexw80 @Cernovich No, I don’t believe it, easy to submit false research data like they did with The Lancet and HCQ by Peter Daszak and 26 other conflicted scientists and doctors. https://t.co/V7QjVYvVy8
@Moma20211 @idrissaberkane https://t.co/CM3Yh1AAig Et ça pour la route... Si vous n'avez pas compris je ne peux rien pour vous.
@DrDavidNL @HaHaGentherapie Ik negeer geen wetenschappelijk bewijs, jij doet dat. En je negeert dat The Lancet onderzoeken publiceert die nooit hebben plaatsgevonden maar volledig uit de duim zijn gezogen. https://t.co/UdkqyQoBLg
@daily_barbarian The misinfo panics surrounding first hydroxychloroquine then ivermectin were good ones https://t.co/QcnFVHlhQb
Just for the record if #Twitter didn't enjoy 230 immunities, I would absolutely have my attorney who's on retainer sue them over this. If you don't like satire fine, happy to rephrase, but it is wrong to mislead the public by calling something misleading t
@TwitterSupport called my post misleading today. How is the truth misleading? Here are the references to back it up. This is insanity. NIH on Hydroxy Efficacy: https://t.co/JMJZ7TjHYY Lancet's Retraction for jumping gun: https://t.co/Gh6K5rKd7z https://t
@Cbrick98 @proconmedia @BoricuaEnBoston @Daferzz @DefStamina For your reference and @TwitterSupport as they may not be aware. If you would like video of #CDC falsely claiming it didn't provide efficacy I'll provide it. Here's the retraction: https://t.c
RT @nhmncndtn: @JeanRees10 assault on potential early therapies? Lancet and NEJM coordinate publication of studies showing HCQ ineffective…
@PamelaW31260390 @PrifWeinidog @MarkDrakeford The Lancet. 😂 https://t.co/GGVxClIgr4
@JeanRees10 assault on potential early therapies? Lancet and NEJM coordinate publication of studies showing HCQ ineffective but studies were based on imaginary data set and both were retracted a. https://t.co/OInIfEQFDm b. https://t.co/3pB9IDcUz8 IVM is
@Rezydenci @Puls_Medycyny @KludkowskaM @lpietrzak20 @a_bazydloMD @damian_patecki @kosik_md @GiKolbe @grzesiowski_p @lekarzsuwala Badania wykazują, że większość problemów współczesnej medycyny wynika z korupcji, braku myślenia wśród lekarzy i bezrefleksyjne
RT @DavidLWindt: The Lancet hydroxychloroquine study has been retracted. https://t.co/cqfRVKN5GT
@HercNav130 @JamesSurowiecki Yes you mean this one, right? https://t.co/r78Q170ZJU
@CollignonPeter The study that demonised HCQ as a treatment for Covid has been retracted. This is criminal - why has no one picked up on this. https://t.co/Yn4j98S0LH
RT @DavidLWindt: The Lancet hydroxychloroquine study has been retracted. https://t.co/cqfRVKN5GT
RT @Gessi2323: @StarForceHQ1 @richardursomd @drsimonegold Sorry, your MSM didn’t tell you that the peer reviewed paper they used to support…
@sqirlgirly @btysonmd @ENiedfeldt Which fraudulent and withdrawn data? R U aware that @US_FDA , Rick Bright (#BARDA) who’s now at Rockefeller, & the CDC used a fake company #surgisphere to misrepresent #hcq in a retracted 2020 @TheLancet study? https:/
@BatByann @VinnieMarano @EricMMatheny Presume you’re not trained in the sciences. https://t.co/Tuxvr7HvDJ https://t.co/291zNXIAdc
@WideRangeThink あ、自分が書いて都合の悪くなったツイート読めないようにしたのかw かっこ悪いね。 https://t.co/zgBRQew2uT リツイートで自分の恥をばら撒く、マゾヒスティックな趣味もお持ちのようで、ちょっと私には理解できないな~w じゃ、バイバイ。
@WideRangeThink これほど滅茶苦茶な内容だから、おかしいことに読者が気づいたのですが、もう少しまともに作ればそのまま遠田ということです。 https://t.co/XXF295B6sE
@WideRangeThink 既に存在が公知でデータの揃った既存薬を潰すのは、https://t.co/XXF295k3qE ほど矛盾に満ちていなければ成功するということ。存在がまだ分からないワクチンを潰すなら、リサーチや開発妨害に莫大な手間と費用が掛かりますが。問題をすり替えようとしても無駄だし、経済の常識もないのですね。
@OrTheDailyMail @LBC This Lancet? https://t.co/kXv4nHHivK There's lots of nonsense on all sides of the debate
@ZoeLightly Sapan Desai ~ https://t.co/VzuISOGHId
RT @olivier_pourret: We really need change more #OpenScholarship #OpenScience #OpenPeerReview
RT @olivier_pourret: We really need change more #OpenScholarship #OpenScience #OpenPeerReview
RT @olivier_pourret: We really need change more #OpenScholarship #OpenScience #OpenPeerReview
The global conspiracy to shut down HCQ was detected. Maybe with ivermectin they got lucky https://t.co/4TqVeqkck1
@ScottAdamsSays The global conspiracy to shut down HCQ was detected. Maybe with ivermectin they got lucky https://t.co/4TqVeqkck1
RT @Gessi2323: @StarForceHQ1 @richardursomd @drsimonegold Sorry, your MSM didn’t tell you that the peer reviewed paper they used to support…
@PeterBackes3 @P_McCulloughMD Is that the same lancet that published a completely fraudulent hydroxy chloroquine study and only retracted it when they were put under unbearable pressure? https://t.co/mksq9OVk9X
@loraykin @BenusJack @James_Havlin @ivtc0 Scruitise how this 'science' happened. https://t.co/0MIv1ntRdo
RT @DeinertDoc: @MarcusPaulus6 @marionbeckr @NoisenburgArtur @LouisaNapolina Besonders prekär ist es, wenn die Presse auf negative Studiene…
@FuriousKoen @russeurope The Lancet https://t.co/ikRU9t7kSP https://t.co/n2jTCQETYx Peut-être que celui-ci est mieux ? 🤔 Qu'en pensez-vous ? 🤔🧐
RT @DeinertDoc: @MarcusPaulus6 @marionbeckr @NoisenburgArtur @LouisaNapolina Besonders prekär ist es, wenn die Presse auf negative Studiene…
Another friendly reminder: remember when these two pieces of scientific fraud were published and used to demonized hydroxychloroquine? They weren’t science, but frauds, and both of these prestigious journals retracted them. https://t.co/JkwCjnTBxZ https
@Hoover5454 @BusterNakamoto @JoshGrissom_ @ClayTravis https://t.co/XNWUFXQ3tB You know HCQ was highly effective for SARS-Covi 1 right? Why can’t treatments and vaccines exist? Monochlonal antibodies exist as treatment but my doctor wouldn’t prescribe me th
@GideonGil @adamfeuerstein @statnews *Lancet Retraction https://t.co/rMD5UOOPEj
@IAjulufo @5thavenueartist @GBNEWS Thank you very much 😉 https://t.co/bmca1ttdHV
@PhilippeRainant @OSS117_Helsinki Le benêt de Twitter ne sait même pas que l'étude frauduleuse contre l'hydroxychloroquine a été rétractée Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational r
@OSS117_Helsinki @JacquesCresta @OSS117_Helsinki le Quidam benêt de Twitter ne sait même pas que l'étude frauduleuse contre l'hydroxychloroquine a été rétractée du @TheLancet Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for trea
RT @newyorkscammer: @JohnnyByrnes @JoyAnnReid Why did the Lancet published a false study without any confirmation if it's soooo obviously b…
@angelinheart595 無錯, 左癌成日攞disinformation 出黎做argument, 就cancel 同滅聲, 佢哋又憑乜話人哋係錯? 補埋Lancet 道歉聲明條link 都仲得 https://t.co/pA9Hbmp9ic
@MacroAlf The same Lancet👇? https://t.co/1KsRNGBYsd
@GeorgeJ20262901 @ryanturbeville @ScottAdamsSays The scorn over hydroxy is based on a paper published in the Lancet. It was up for 2 weeks until it was retracted because of dodgy & falsified data. The study gave overdose levels of hydroxy to extremely
@InsoniaMaxima @LeoSant0375 @roxmo Então eu te desafio a mostrá-los como este aqui que foi retratado: https://t.co/8w84hUZTVK
RT @th3hypn0tist: @MattiMuukkonen @HannaSokajarvi @Marjo56392124 Miten olis niiden aikaisten hoitomuotojen peräänkuuluttaminen? Tiestikö m…
@stubydesign @KathMLee1 The Sokal paper was BS and yet it was peer reviewed and published. A paper attacking Hydroxychloroquine was published in The Lancet and retracted due to dubious data. https://t.co/cJ6FCTeUVD
@martincvmed @yurfader2001 @StratCons @CansinoBio @TheLancet Yo no lo he tomado como opinión de expertos, fuiste tu. Tampoco he dicho que The Lancet sea una mala revista científica, dije que no es la primera vez que publican cosas erróneas, por ejemplo ht
RT @DougBebb: @whirli_gig @MaximeBernier Here is Lancet for you: https://t.co/1sHdDbERX3 They were forced to retract their fake hit-piece o…
@figolambo @ViableBen @Altimor Here is the retracted paper: https://t.co/vLYFvEAXww
@EconomyStarSet @mariapaolarj @AnnaSellsKC @joerogan IVM for COVID-19 Meta Analysis- 71 studies. https://t.co/DojOtskVIA HCQ- Meta Analysis-302 studies. https://t.co/90ahHstlZy Retraction notice-bogus HCQ study used to ban outpatient usage of HCQ for COV