RT @michaelmina_lab: Also - Here is what would happen if we implemented this program! (Note, we mistakenly labeled this "surveillance" but…
@yiannis_entropy This is one piece. Ideally though I'd like to see 20M tests produced and get people tested 2x/week which would have very rapid benefits. https://t.co/eEikszXiJX https://t.co/fJ4NOOorFU
RT @michaelmina_lab: Also - Here is what would happen if we implemented this program! (Note, we mistakenly labeled this "surveillance" but…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Also - Here is what would happen if we implemented this program! (Note, we mistakenly labeled this "surveillance" but…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Also - Here is what would happen if we implemented this program! (Note, we mistakenly labeled this "surveillance" but…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Also - Here is what would happen if we implemented this program! (Note, we mistakenly labeled this "surveillance" but…
RT michaelmina_lab https://t.co/CkwT4MRINy "Also - Here is what would happen if we implemented this program! (Note, we mistakenly labeled this "surveillance" but it should be "screening". This comes from a soon to be formally published
Also - Here is what would happen if we implemented this program! (Note, we mistakenly labeled this "surveillance" but it should be "screening". This comes from a soon to be formally published pre-print: https://t.co/eEikszXiJX https://t.co/w4sqdDh17c
@ClareCraigPath Even 3% @32% = .96% -> not that far off 0.7%. Δ from falling level of disease between two dates as indicated by recent data? New rapid antigen test are pretty sensitive to infectiousness; speed & frequency are important if testing
RT @Belex70: @CarstenBKK @GEGENCovidioten @miob1781 @Robert83563198 @EckerleIsabella Ja, ist das Paper von @michaelmina_lab und @DanLarremo…
RT @Belex70: @CarstenBKK @GEGENCovidioten @miob1781 @Robert83563198 @EckerleIsabella Ja, ist das Paper von @michaelmina_lab und @DanLarremo…
@CarstenBKK @GEGENCovidioten @miob1781 @Robert83563198 @EckerleIsabella Ja, ist das Paper von @michaelmina_lab und @DanLarremore. Sicherlich eins der wichtigsten Paper um den Public Health Ansatz mittels #Schnelltests zu verstehen. https://t.co/exboDABbqc
RT @Belex70: @EckerleIsabella @GEGENCovidioten Ja. Im Public Health Ansatz zum Einsatz von #Schnelltests geht es nur darum das Infektionsge…
RT @Belex70: @EckerleIsabella @GEGENCovidioten Ja. Im Public Health Ansatz zum Einsatz von #Schnelltests geht es nur darum das Infektionsge…
@EckerleIsabella @GEGENCovidioten Ja. Im Public Health Ansatz zum Einsatz von #Schnelltests geht es nur darum das Infektionsgeschehen unter Kontrolle zu bringen und erst dann vorsichtig zu öffnen. Von daher, vielen Dank für die Klarstellung. Dissonanz 💯% g
RT @Dr_Cate_P: @ericsss @JesseJames19861 @cdenki @PaulaPasst (2) Tests zur Diagnose & Tests zur Eindämmung benötigen verschiedene Eigenscha…
@ericsss @JesseJames19861 @cdenki @PaulaPasst (2) Tests zur Diagnose & Tests zur Eindämmung benötigen verschiedene Eigenschaften ➡️ Diagnostik - Sensitivität wichtig ➡️ Eindämmung - Schnelligkeit wichtig, Sensitivität zweitrangig https://t.co/tM
RT @CanadaDaveNS: @PattyHajdu Inaction Is a Negative Action. How Can You Not Act? @GovCanHealth
@michaelmina_lab @buzzhollandermd I skimmed this paper. It seems that you assumed that transmission after isolation would be zero, but I may have missed it. I haven't seen any good studies on within household transmission rates during home isolation. https
RT @AdamJKucharski: @MakeupStorePRO @DrEricDing @adamhamdy @DPH_MAshton You might want to read this: https://t.co/Rzxu7LLzmV
RT @AdamJKucharski: @MakeupStorePRO @DrEricDing @adamhamdy @DPH_MAshton You might want to read this: https://t.co/Rzxu7LLzmV
RT AdamJKucharski https://t.co/on4ZwjmC8Y "MakeupStorePRO DrEricDing adamhamdy DPH_MAshton You might want to read this: https://t.co/36NcG5uoqB"
@MakeupStorePRO @DrEricDing @adamhamdy @DPH_MAshton You might want to read this: https://t.co/Rzxu7LLzmV
RT @CanadaDaveNS: @PattyHajdu Inaction Is a Negative Action. How Can You Not Act? @GovCanHealth
@SunriserMa @HoeraufProf @HBraun @jensspahn Definitiv. AUFKLÄRUNG und richtiger Einsatz der #Schnelltests sind essentiell. Schnelltests als "Clearance/Türöffner " zu nutzen, birgt immer ein Risiko. Das wahre Potenzial liegt in einer breiten Anwendung zur
RT @CanadaDaveNS: @PattyHajdu Inaction Is a Negative Action. How Can You Not Act? @GovCanHealth
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
RT @CanadaDaveNS: @PattyHajdu Inaction Is a Negative Action. How Can You Not Act? @GovCanHealth
@PattyHajdu Inaction Is a Negative Action. How Can You Not Act? @GovCanHealth
@PattyHajdu Are Covid19 Testing Changes Coming? @GovCanHealth https://t.co/aA5I0XxVCL
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @mik_glass: That's a very good point. If you have a test which is let's say 100% accurate, but if it takes 1 day, 2 days a week for resu…
RT @mik_glass: That's a very good point. If you have a test which is let's say 100% accurate, but if it takes 1 day, 2 days a week for resu…
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article.... https://t.co/bjZmLsbMLu
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @THEjohn_dough: Great work by @michaelmina_lab and his team ! The science is being proven for the need of rapid antigen testing and abil…
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article.... https://t.co/bjZmLsbMLu
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article.... https://t.co/bjZmLsbMLu
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
Great work by @michaelmina_lab and his team ! The science is being proven for the need of rapid antigen testing and abilities to identify asymptomatic persons #covid #sona #rapidtesting
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
RT @ArlenHansen: Excellent article....
Excellent article....
RT @whips83: $SONA 🇨🇦 https://t.co/96JZfbvqgZ
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
RT @kincomm: Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround tim…
$SONA 🇨🇦
Scientists & researchers have concluded that effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and turnaround time, and is only marginally improved by high test sensitivity. Click to read full article: https://t.co/6mfI9fwDgO $SONA $SNANF
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
Here's the full link, see also @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath @toadmeister https://t.co/RcMd7oqgYo https://t.co/hRIdTX3bZP
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
RT @jholston: "results demonstrate effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and speed of reporting, and is only margi…
😷 ¿Son los test rápidos el arma secreta contra coronavirus?. Un estudio clínico español revela que permiten identificar el 80% de los casos, dejando solo los que tienen poca carga viral. Algunos académicos lo ven muy prometedor https://t.co/fFSAEUYRzn
"results demonstrate effective surveillance depends largely on frequency of testing and speed of reporting, and is only marginally improved by high test sensitivity. ..surveillance should prioritize accessibility, frequency, and sample-to-answer time; " ht
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
Frequent (read ‘inexpensive’) frequent testing is needed to open institutions safely. Maybe in a couple of months, there will be a US government that cares to control the spread of the novel coronavirus.
Part 1 of Biden's published Covid plan includes: "Invest in next-generation testing, including at home tests and instant tests, so we can scale up our testing capacity by orders of magnitude". https://t.co/YJJsPtoRyZ
Non-pharmacologic suppression of SARS-Cov-2. IMPORTANT
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
RT michaelmina_lab https://t.co/4jEs5xinLs "The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequent rapid testing that can control outbreaks without vaccines. https://t.co/pVb9eaGDnV
RT @michaelmina_lab: The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequen…
The sensitivity metrics AND specificity metrics are now completely in alignment with what we have proposed for frequent rapid testing that can control outbreaks without vaccines. https://t.co/tMJmRRdVax 3/
.
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
RT gregggonsalves https://t.co/NjxNOpLBWs "RT AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…"
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
fast and frequent testing more important than accuracy (which only matters up to a point) https://t.co/e18ExKR2oe PCR tests take up to hours up to one day, antigen and LAMP tests can be as fast as 10 minutes https://t.co/Q8FaHUXKSX https://t.co/ZIdjX8h
@JacoboMendioroz @gmnzgerard Supongo que ya conoces este artículo https://t.co/WFg9VJRg9m https://t.co/MxlHSHqlY2
As Daniel Larremore @DanLarremore, M. Mina @michaelmina_lab & al. have shown in their paper: https://t.co/Wx8MD8xayx The advantage of speed & coverage is very likely to overcome the (putative) disadvantage of lower sensitivity.
@notadoc15584916 @GoerlichLars Im klinischen Setting muss die Sensitivität so hoch wie möglich sein. Als Public Health Maßnahme sind Testfrequenz und Verzug zwischen Test und Ergebnis wichtiger als Sensitivität. https://t.co/1ucRMShkyZ
RT @basementvegan: @altmaralago @AliVelshi @michaelmina_lab I was down on rapid testing - especially the way the tests are used at the WH.…
@altmaralago @AliVelshi @michaelmina_lab I was down on rapid testing - especially the way the tests are used at the WH. I had to admit my pov had become political and not scientific. I was turned around by this paper. This week I went back to a podcast I l
RT @goo3_tm: インフルエンザの潜伏期間が2日程度であるように、急性ウイルス感染症は日単位で結果が変わります🤔 偽陽性を疑うレベルのCt値→翌日再検査でバッチリ陽性など。 検出可能期間は長いものの、予防的に『感染可能期間の患者』を見つけるための健診的検査はたしかに週1…
RT @RapidtestsDE: @c_drosten Danke! @EckerleIsabella Mehr zu Antigen-#Schnelltests: Anwendung als Nasen-Selbstabstrich: https://t.co/Ofd…
I was against this, but have absolutely changed my mind. https://t.co/VbnlriTILt
RT @Arrianna_Planey: Important https://t.co/1rab1N52SG
RT @ml_barnett: @JAMAInternalMed @McGarryBE @DavidCGrabowski Only 13.5% of nursing homes got test results back <1 day. Slower than this and…
@JAMAInternalMed @McGarryBE @DavidCGrabowski Only 13.5% of nursing homes got test results back <1 day. Slower than this and modeling by folks like @DanLarremore @michaelmina_lab shows that screening loses most of its effectiveness. https://t.co/smsfhhM
Wichtiger Tweet der die neuesten/wichtigsten PPs zu Ag-#Schnelltests aufführt.
@ralf_lpz @MartinUMueller @derspiegel Nutzung von #Schnelltests als "Türöffner" birgt immer ein Risiko. Einen echten Eindämmungseffekt können 🏠 Schnelltests bei regelmäßiger Anwendung erzielen, was die Fallzahlen senkt. Dafür müssen die Tests nicht einmal
@saugarmaripuri @GovTimWalz Here are some interesting papers and resources: https://t.co/CL2RMjVnBR
Would using lower sensitivity antigen tests instead of PCR tests work equally well? YES! We have epidemiological models, e.g., this one by @DanLarremore et. al., showing frequency is more important than sensitivity. See more at https://t.co/ZLbM1UQG3k ht
RT @RapidtestsDE: @c_drosten Danke! @EckerleIsabella Mehr zu Antigen-#Schnelltests: Anwendung als Nasen-Selbstabstrich: https://t.co/Ofd…
RT @RapidtestsDE: @c_drosten Danke! @EckerleIsabella Mehr zu Antigen-#Schnelltests: Anwendung als Nasen-Selbstabstrich: https://t.co/Ofd…
siehe auch hier @Lilium1898