Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 surveillance | medRxiv @aparanjape https://t.co/ULCmrnkx4G
RT @michaelmina_lab: @dzviovich @nntaleb Here is a preprint we put out back in June discussing this as well. Recently updated with new sims…
The time for easy access covid testing is now! @OntPharmacists @GovCanHealth
Neue Figure 5 im aktualiserten @michaelmina_lab-Preprint betrachtet, wie schnell #Corona-Welle abebbt, wenn man alle 3 oder 7 Tage mit #Schnelltests testet... Text noch nicht gelesen, Grafik aber sehr eindrucksvoll!
RT @michaelmina_lab: @dzviovich @nntaleb Here is a preprint we put out back in June discussing this as well. Recently updated with new sims…
RT @michaelmina_lab: @dzviovich @nntaleb Here is a preprint we put out back in June discussing this as well. Recently updated with new sims…
RT @michaelmina_lab: @dzviovich @nntaleb Here is a preprint we put out back in June discussing this as well. Recently updated with new sims…
RT @michaelmina_lab: @dzviovich @nntaleb Here is a preprint we put out back in June discussing this as well. Recently updated with new sims…
@dzviovich @nntaleb Here is a preprint we put out back in June discussing this as well. Recently updated with new sims of effectiveness across distinct testing regimens. w @DanLarremore @brwilder https://t.co/tMJmRRvw25
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
@wargonm Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 surveillance https://t.co/347EHAEmCR
RT @Belex70: @JonasHeidelberg @PetraDickmann @michaelmina_lab @ADPaltiel Vielen Dank, super Artikel @PetraDickmann. 2 Hinweise, da mE zu we…
In response to @MichaelMina_Lab’s https://t.co/F6PdxipTjv and the preprint “Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 surveillance” (https://t.co/HM5fQUe2kS) JD says this “does not consider the harms mass testing will do
@Megumi_Ogata https://t.co/2ntwcEcIMa 週1の検査でRは半分以下に
@benyeohben @RoyalStatSoc @srichardson962 @deeksj Something like this? https://t.co/ox8mHS1MXv
@deeksj Could you give an idea of why you disagree with the thinking on utility/harms of daily low sensitivity tests, as outlined in thread below & in the author’s preprint “Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 su
RT @Belex70: @JonasHeidelberg @PetraDickmann @michaelmina_lab @ADPaltiel Vielen Dank, super Artikel @PetraDickmann. 2 Hinweise, da mE zu we…
RT @Belex70: @JonasHeidelberg @PetraDickmann @michaelmina_lab @ADPaltiel Vielen Dank, super Artikel @PetraDickmann. 2 Hinweise, da mE zu we…
@JonasHeidelberg @PetraDickmann @michaelmina_lab @ADPaltiel Vielen Dank, super Artikel @PetraDickmann. 2 Hinweise, da mE zu wenig beachtet, um Hotspots frühzeitig zu erkennen: 1) Abwasserteststs mittels PCR: https://t.co/iz2YZueBu8 2) Testfrequenz ist wi
In COVID testing, the perfect is the enemy of the good. Rapid tests are the way to re-open safely in an untrusted system. *Moderately accurate tests daily or every 3 days w/fast results can suppress #COVID spread. #safereopeningschools #covidoncampus
At minimum, UCSF could initiate rapid, color based LAMP testing as is being done at other institutions. The argument for “test sensitivity being secondary to frequency and turnaround time” in surveillance testing is pretty strong. https://t.co/hLaw3BCohP
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
RT @S_Ordibehesht: @MattSibson What the government (in fact all governments) should really do, and do so as a matter of urgency, is providi…
@MattSibson What the government (in fact all governments) should really do, and do so as a matter of urgency, is providing households with low-cost means of self-testing, and on this account: https://t.co/nUlvzxD1EV Test sensitivity is found to be secondar
Contribute a rapid review or request one for "Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 surveillance" (https://t.co/k8wSlXpRLJ). "Add" or "Request" w/DOI (10.1101/2020.06.22.20136309) at https://t.co/RnurTL3DyM @outbreaksc
Updated #SARSCoV preprint: Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 surveillance https://t.co/k8wSlXpRLJ
.And read this for the findings of a study modelling "surveillance effectiveness considering test sensitivities, frequency, and sample-to-answer reporting time." #Nepal #COVID #COVID19 #COVID19Nepal #AntigenTest time.https://t.co/QA4Wp7QB5g
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
@BobLobl90233903 @sarahdwire @maggieNYT https://t.co/GgTlz7V6fY And they absolutely do exist. In fact there are several that exist. E2Bio, Mammoth, Sherlock all have various versions of the simple paper later-flow assay. Currently not producing due to CLI
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
RT @AdamJKucharski: Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defin…
Scaled up testing will therefore have most obvious benefit in higher risk environments/workplaces, or during well-defined outbreaks. Even so, testing would need to be frequent and fast to make a notable difference (e.g. https://t.co/FiUvUE4l2f & https
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
RT @S_Ordibehesht: @NicolaSturgeon @rosscolquhoun Please consider this option: https://t.co/OgFaoIkjaw The authors show that quick low-cost…
@NicolaSturgeon @rosscolquhoun Please consider this option: https://t.co/OgFaoIkjaw The authors show that quick low-cost, albeit not ideally sensitive, testing that is carried out frequently (e.g. once every day, say, before leaving home) is very effective
RT @S_Ordibehesht: @mabian @AliNouriPhD Thank you. (Re-tweeted after reading the paper.*) _____ *https://t.co/OgFaoIkjaw
RT @S_Ordibehesht: @mabian @AliNouriPhD Thank you. (Re-tweeted after reading the paper.*) _____ *https://t.co/OgFaoIkjaw
@mabian @AliNouriPhD Thank you. (Re-tweeted after reading the paper.*) _____ *https://t.co/OgFaoIkjaw
頻回検査では、感度の重要度は下がる。
@AnupSubedee @smadixit The scientific paper yet to be peer-reviewed (https://t.co/EMaUwkciX2) indicates that people with 10,000 viruses in their airways can’t infect others, and the infectiousness increases to 40% when viral load increases to 10,000,000 vi
Para los q les interesan los datos acá está el artículo donde desarrollan el modelo matemático al q hacen referencia. https://t.co/ppdJZXYyMC Y este es el pre-print donde se propone la necesidad de tests rápidos, baratos y frecuentes. https://t.co/7pXWUX
@hsfi kirjoittaa nopeista antigeenitesteistä ml. @ArcDialtd:n #mariPOC:ista ja viittaavat The New York Timesin artikkeliin sekä tiedejulkaisuun https://t.co/ieEPic3oNx https://t.co/P8tLzKy0zi https://t.co/9bERU4RpP3
RT @lpachter: Particularly concerning is a divergence between scientific consensus that frequent testing is essential for keeping R < 1, an…
@marie_holmqvist Absolut viktigaste i en pandemi och väl beskrivet https://t.co/DPwVwJ4Jkd
@nooktacular @BadCOVID19Takes The preprint explains in detail: https://t.co/Mwh8zisbI3
@DanWolken @USATODAY cheap, daily, rapid tests! @michaelmina_lab Article https://t.co/3sLIYln8iH Paper https://t.co/jj5mzwV6CY Podcast https://t.co/8i7en58jTX
RT @rdivia: More on this by this pre print paper by @michaelmina_lab @MilindTambe_AI https://t.co/EFzeqraUDM
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
@Aceditor @jburnmurdoch Ideally we want a 100% sensitive test. But if we can test 80% of the population daily with even a 50% sensitive test, thats got to be better from a public health perspective / outbreak control than testing 0.2% of the population wit
Test ràpids per agafar una nova normalitat, però de debó! @salutcat com va la comanda?
@oriolmitja 2-3 setmanes? Hem de ser ambiciosos! 2 cops per setmana.. o cada dia! https://t.co/pVbOENEnIk https://t.co/g9hBCQSzwd
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
RT @suzuki_takaya: 直近のNatureのブリーフィングでコメントされていたサーベイランスPCRのモデリング、プレプリント。状況はロックダウンではなくて人々は普通に暮らしていてテスト陽性のときに隔離されるという前提。感染やRを減らすのに、テスト感度は大きな問題で…
まさかMichael Minaの繰り返し検査戦略が日本でも取り沙汰されるようになるとは思わなかった。あまりにもレベルが違いすぎて。 https://t.co/zf5zNcko5p
More on this by this pre print paper by @michaelmina_lab @MilindTambe_AI https://t.co/EFzeqraUDM
RT @olga_francino: @micromunidad @michaelmina_lab Interesante estudio sobre vigilancia epidemiológica de SARS-CoV-2 de @DanLarremore @micha…
@micromunidad @michaelmina_lab Interesante estudio sobre vigilancia epidemiológica de SARS-CoV-2 de @DanLarremore @michaelmina_lab
"Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency andturnaround time for #COVID19 surveillance" [pdf] https://t.co/nxYEdRLK58
@fiddle This had been the basis for the argument that more frequent testing with very fast turnaround, like these rapid tests provide, is a better way to stop spread than slower and more expensive, but more sensitive, tests. https://t.co/d2Pt08K4dK
Investigadores de las Universidades de Harvard y Colorado Boulder, liderados por el epidemiólogo Michael Mina, lo analizaban en este preprint del mes de junio https://t.co/GnJCd0Sbrh 6/
RT @70sBachchan: Need FAST turn around of tests - same day - so you can isolate & not infect others. More than 2 days, as is sadly too comm…
@EARL_Med_Tw これ以上の細かい話を素人の私とされても時間の無駄に終る可能性が高いと思うのでpreprint のpaperを貼っておしまいにしますね。 https://t.co/qCceFz65Ru
@SapiensWell @RapidtestsDE @JonasHeidelberg Kennen Sie den Artikel schon? https://t.co/PwG8NB6xsW
RT @michaelmina_lab: In work with @DanLarremore, Roy Parker, @brwilder @MilindTambe_AI @jameshay218 We show that poor test sensitivity is j…
@fadilify @deeksj @michaelmina_lab @CT_Bergstrom https://t.co/L6M9XH2L8Q This is an excellent study by @michaelmina_lab and his team. It's worth reading. Wonder if you have already read this as this created a considerable buzz in the US a couple of weeks
Is @universityofga pushing for the use of monoclonal antibody tests on paper strips for rapid, high-capacity SARS 2 testing? https://t.co/fXzkFcy82j https://t.co/AxPvDtX35d https://t.co/yLmXnbCD6l Michael Mina at (~22:00) https://t.co/VpI0rlBA6f
We are facing a testing capacity shortfall with schools returning. And models have suggested that frequent testing with rapid turn-around with good tests is better at suppressing spread than the excellent slow tests (e.g. the standard PCR test). 3/3 https
@VirusesImmunity @BioRender emphasis on CAN. This is the first confirmed case. given that the secondary challenge is met with much greater defence, it is debatable that a secondary infected person would have the viral load to be infectious. https://t.co/j
RT @tyonarock: @kottur_lover22 プレプリントですが、ハーバード公衆衛生学からスクリーニング頻度に関する論文です。 https://t.co/m4vw70OzgE https://t.co/tYb1PwNVe3
RT @suzuki_takaya: から見た場合は頭にしっくり来る感じがします。 https://t.co/Sz8C7ps2wI
A lockdown alternative: 1: Mass deployment of $1 lick tests. Take every few days. 2: If positive, go and get a more accurate PCR test 3: If still positive, volunteer to go to a quarantine facility. Or just self-isolate. What am I missing here???? https:/
RT @tyonarock: @kottur_lover22 プレプリントですが、ハーバード公衆衛生学からスクリーニング頻度に関する論文です。 https://t.co/m4vw70OzgE https://t.co/tYb1PwNVe3