You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data Mining Techniques for the Life Sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3572-7 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3570-3, 978-1-4939-3572-7
|
| Editors |
Oliviero Carugo, Frank Eisenhaber |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 60% |
| Scientists | 16 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 23% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,028,173
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#93
of 13,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,097
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#16
of 1,461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.