RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@KyleTober84 @dr_jon_l @3GHtweets Re: "Well when it comes to mass vaccination that is all there was." It's also dishonest to say there were only case reports, since there were studies with control groups (ex: RCTs, cohort, case-control). Unsurprising to
@KyleTober84 @dr_jon_l @3GHtweets The right answer is 'yes', but you'd rather not give that answer since it would get in the way of your non-expert vaccine denialism. Again: Yes or no, are case reports with no control group lower on the evidence pyramid?
@ID_Denmark @yoshkapundrick @rdmorris @Stanford Are you again pretending not to know the difference between absolute risk reduction vs. relative risk reduction? A healthy child having low absolute risk does not mean the relative risk reduction is 0%. htt
@sudokuvariante @rdmorris @Stanford Why? It's not like a vaccine denialist + conspiracist like you is honestly interested in evidence. You'll just evade in bad faith. https://t.co/hLpj7braMv https://t.co/geFpUdJWdR https://t.co/tgm0oNakmC https://t.co/H
@Chestman225 @LexWillem @CathLouisa1976 Helaas, je hebt het mis. Vaccinaties werken wel degelijk. Onafhankelijk onderzoek van gerespecteerde wetenschappers, gepubliceerd door gerespecteerde media wijst dat uit. https://t.co/e5pNhe4ZAW
@Marc_Veld @bbrandt85 @gtuckerkellogg @BretWeinstein @Debunk_the_Funk Weinstein + his crowd largely take in paranoid non-experts who haven't learn the basics of evaluating medical studies (ex: the evidence pyramid). Getting through to such baselessly para
@Franck20270 Ben c'était publié dès décembre 2020. https://t.co/Cl4x2hM4Pq
@coreisma @dr_jon_l @jennabgreen @Doctor_Eric_B @gorskon @CaulfieldTim @medicamentarii @MakisMD @DrCanuckMD @DrJacobsRad @19joho @DrEricDing Come back when you've learned that basics of evaluating medical research, non-expert vaccine denialist, instead of
@boianspeaks @gentle_class7 @GidMK You can spam that image as much as you want, as you're being reported for it. No one sensible + informed is going to fall for your ecological analysis that's riddled with confounding, when there are controlled studies th
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@charbonnie41003 @lonnibesancon @charbonnie41003 Voilà pour commencer les études d'efficacité et de safety sur lesquelles nous nous sommes basés. Bonne lecture https://t.co/jdOBix1jSY https://t.co/y8BBw837NN https://t.co/6GumrU7JQf https://t.co/8uDA3BOKfF
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@ann_tempany @mattletiss7 @CommunityNotes https://t.co/2Z8w77k5ao Dr Zoe replied at the time as you'll see , she couldn't see the evidence of the claim either , but you think it's sound ?
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@eatassnocovid 4/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71gvS6 https://t.co/C3
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@HorusTheRed @LeeHurstComic @barneymcg999 @Lord_Sugar That’s irrelevant to my point. But AZ conducted Phase 3 trials April-Nov 2020 and the rollout wasn’t until 2021, what exactly do you mean? https://t.co/nYzZJvNy1F
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
RT @zoeharcombe: @thismorning @sara_kayat Please can you provide the evidence for this claim? The published literature does not claim this.…
@SaraWar94800325 @_Mindbrain_ @trying2help Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/on
@skinny1974 @RedGuardsAB @pancholi_rakhi 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/o
@PaulKni01817402 @DrAseemMalhotra No (not sure which trials you are referring to) Here you go Pfizer; https://t.co/wh4c7o9aZg Moderna https://t.co/ZAxuraDXav AZ https://t.co/5ZbvSTBLnh
@JCmacc1 @forgedcoupon @thereal_truther It's almost like he never actually read the study's he's trolling about. They're talking about symptomatic infection or illness, which is COVID-19. He doesn't know the difference between COVID-19 vs. SARS-CoV-2. h
@banthebbc Line No.2 of findings on the front page, standard dose regime. https://t.co/7debWOTedV
@chatterbox1973 @Crazycanuk5 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE h
@Jeff_mc2 @soundreece @SkepticJonGuy @spencergwatson @stevethejuice @Truth_in_Number @SuzieQT11 Again, I'm not interested in random unsourced claims from non-expert vaccine denialists. I've been dealing with anti-vaxxers for over a decade; I'm not gullibl
@BarryESharp @PharmaSME1984 @MatthewStadlen @wolsned As I said look at the whole picture, stop cherry picking. You will be calling yourself Campbell next https://t.co/VoqBQMWXlS
@keith_tauber @mc_gabber Cool. Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE ht
@mc_gabber Here are some of the studies were completed before the vaccines were approved for use in Canada. https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @janiesaysyay @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @DrBenTapper1 @NestCommander Are you claiming that's happening from vac…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
@JimS13616993 @LiteWorkR @DanaElizabeth69 @qtbeauty @justicehall69 @james2012 @RonPaul4Constit @2ndfor1st @NULOOKREFINISH @wikileaks @Cernovich @PlaysTrumpCard @POTUS @realDonaldTrump That's nice, FirstNameInitialBunchOfNumbers. Maybe one day you'll final
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune respons…
@jchilders98 @thereal_truther @jathorpmfm Your lack of knowledge is showing. 1) Inflammation + systemic immune responses are normal; they occur with beneficial immune responses. Learn that. 2) We already have safety studies on the vaccines, which is why y
@janiesaysyay @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @DrBenTapper1 @NestCommander Are you claiming that's happening from vaccinations? If so, where's the *clinical* evidence of harm? No, proposing mechanisms does not count as clinical evidence. https://t.co/4
@sunni__16 @Creativologist @KLVeritas No, it won't, conspiracist. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
RT @1IDCNMI: ส่วน chadOx (AstraZeneca) ออก 20 Dec 2020 (เป็น paper ที่อ่านยากเว่อร์ แต่ทำให้เห็นว่า VE ในแต่ละ site ไม่เท่ากัน ยังมีเรื่อ…
RT @1IDCNMI: ถ้าเอาตามความจริง เราเห็นข้อมูลของวะคซีนหลักๆ ช่วงปลายปี2020แหล่ะ Phase3 trial ChadOx (Astra) 8dec 2020 VE กันติด 70% (แตกต่…
RT @1IDCNMI: ถ้าเอาตามความจริง เราเห็นข้อมูลของวะคซีนหลักๆ ช่วงปลายปี2020แหล่ะ Phase3 trial ChadOx (Astra) 8dec 2020 VE กันติด 70% (แตกต่…
ถ้าเอาตามความจริง เราเห็นข้อมูลของวะคซีนหลักๆ ช่วงปลายปี2020แหล่ะ Phase3 trial ChadOx (Astra) 8dec 2020 VE กันติด 70% (แตกต่างตามแต่ละ site วิจัยในแต่ละประเทศ VE กันหนัก/ตายดีมากๆ https://t.co/7ZDG3naP6U
ส่วน chadOx (AstraZeneca) ออก 20 Dec 2020 (เป็น paper ที่อ่านยากเว่อร์ แต่ทำให้เห็นว่า VE ในแต่ละ site ไม่เท่ากัน ยังมีเรื่อง half dose/full dose และ ฃการยืด interval dose อีก) ใครสนใจไปตำได้ https://t.co/7ZDG3naP6U
@Macj007C @RebelleChylde @IanCopeland5 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/onc
@roadjull @Friedemann1 Have you finally learned how vaccine development + testing works yet, non-expert vaccine denialist? https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/pJZz8g78F3 https://t.co/9IA0rxAD2e
@Rimbau_delaire @lazlowoodbine42 @19joho You're a lost cause. I'm just using you for lulz + as an object lesson for others in baseless conspiracism and denialism. There's no more chance of getting through to you than of getting through to a flat earther,
@Rimbau_delaire @lazlowoodbine42 @19joho And you still have nothing but a bunch of paranoid ramblings typical of non-expert vaccine denialists. The vaccines passed phase 3 RCTs, and so are not experimental + fine to be on the market. Deal with it. 🤷♂️
@TruthHurts2160 @mrhappy255 @kid_krappy @MiamiAllergyDoc @mjtimber2 @thereal_truther @Energyscholar68 @poshfrocks @judysimpson222 @charlespinion @stkirsch @FactsAreGood 6/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were
@FlanFlinger2 @DrMatthewSweet A Wayback Machine listing from https://t.co/m8KYIwZDSa doesn't exactly contradict what I said. Again, the results were published before vaccines became available outside of trials, I already provided two examples above, but he
@mikecarr000 @DustyRoseYYC 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @mentju4 @gtuckerkellogg @TheLegalBrain1 @past_is_future @PeterDaszak @DanielPrantner Anyway, controlled studies on ive…
@TheGammon3 @GetSchwifyinere I've provided you with multiple large scale clinical trials that occurred before they were rolled out, not that they're hard to find with Google. But I get it Dave, you have to ignore them because they challenge the lies you li
@TheGammon3 @GetSchwifyinere Your screenshot doesn't have a date on it, and I've already gone over this. And again, yes, tested, here's a link to all of the trials, including Pfizer's one. https://t.co/6VDJ5uAZKo
@TheGammon3 @GetSchwifyinere Pfizer: https://t.co/WrNZjuOuY9 Moderna: https://t.co/fJOksklrAu AZ: https://t.co/qbLdbIkIpT Novavax: https://t.co/Z4N7la96gg Sanofi: https://t.co/u67EazOmmA
RT @ChanceGardiner: 12. Dr Clare Craig: AstraZeneca ha mai pubblicato i risultati finali del loro trial in UK, Brasile e Sud Africa che era…
12. Dr Clare Craig: AstraZeneca ha mai pubblicato i risultati finali del loro trial in UK, Brasile e Sud Africa che era alla base delle approvazioni del VACClNO. Non riesco a trovare la pubblicazione. Cosa è successo all'altra metà dei partecipanti? http
@MiskelWilliam @EnnnDeee @MeetJess 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h
@Lancillotto810 @Rotelli_MD @LaBombetta76 https://t.co/Gq7KqqISdV https://t.co/pdD6YziZGE https://t.co/AUY6U7Jyem https://t.co/eh7miZi3d9 potrei copiartene un centinaio, ma come ti avevo chiesto dovresti portare tu evidenza.. Credo invece tu non sappia spi
@MichaelZentz @MarkWar16520311 Because no amount of evidence would put vaccine denialists at ease, by definition. You engaging in tone trolling does not change this. https://t.co/rkjvjOB6rZ https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/1ojDdYvOBp https://t.co/gv
@BarryESharp @WanderLight2020 @gtuckerkellogg @shallit43 @CureusInc @GidMK I don't care what that non-expert vaccine denialist account has to say, anymore than I'm interested in the ideological ramblings of a flat Earther. I'm interested in what the publi
@BarryESharp @WanderLight2020 @gtuckerkellogg @shallit43 @CureusInc @GidMK Your incompetence is showing again, non-expert vaccine denialist. The EUA was not about whether they were "experimental". In medical science, RCTs are experiments. Once you pass t
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @trillionofcells @weldeiry @marcus_buggert @JonathanSarfat1 @gorskon @RandPaul @c0nc0rdance Learn what the evidence pyr…
@trillionofcells @weldeiry @marcus_buggert @JonathanSarfat1 @gorskon @RandPaul @c0nc0rdance Learn what the evidence pyramid is, you incompetent charlatan. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
@trillionofcells @dr_jon_l Like I said, you don't know how to read the medical literature, nor what terms like 'evidence hierarchy' mean. If you did, then you'd know what "probably" means in Cochrane meta-analyses + their systematic reviews when discussin
@DaleShaw3rd @AnneFroment @liberal_party 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/o
RT @gyan_chakshu: @ANI Pregnant women were excluded from Astra Zeneca trials. See doc below : "All studies excluded pregnant and breastfe…
@unclejuejue @twobenjamins @Adapa69 @thereal_truther @TheChiefNerd Since you think you are so smart, tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t
RT @gyan_chakshu: @ANI Pregnant women were excluded from Astra Zeneca trials. See doc below : "All studies excluded pregnant and breastfe…
RT @gyan_chakshu: @ANI Pregnant women were excluded from Astra Zeneca trials. See doc below : "All studies excluded pregnant and breastfe…
RT @gyan_chakshu: @ANI Pregnant women were excluded from Astra Zeneca trials. See doc below : "All studies excluded pregnant and breastfe…
RT @gyan_chakshu: @ANI Pregnant women were excluded from Astra Zeneca trials. See doc below : "All studies excluded pregnant and breastfe…
@Mr_Nobody_sorta @Ken__kaneki33 @RemondAlex4 Tenez j'ai réussi à écrire le nom d'une partie des études utilisé, bonne lecture. https://t.co/y1Rv17n52i https://t.co/9nNp2UZVDy https://t.co/u2wIjDyFSe https://t.co/FUm2iQ7WvH https://t.co/iLcMniozsN
@KnKsnKarn @kamsi123 @tapak7 Astra Zeneca data: https://t.co/GH3AjixlJl
@GrumpyOldDoc @weldeiry @gorskon This crowd needs to review the evidence pyramid. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/OZsN0AmIwe https://t.co/ukWQRzZe2j https://t.co/bliHYWD0Xv https://t.co/4TungewEGq