↓ Skip to main content

Emerging and Re-emerging Viral Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 33: Preface – Emerging Viruses: From Early Detection to Intervention
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Preface – Emerging Viruses: From Early Detection to Intervention
Chapter number 33
Book title
Emerging and Re-emerging Viral Infections
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_33
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-952484-9, 978-3-31-952485-6
Authors

Ippolito, Giuseppe, Rezza, Giovanni, Giuseppe Ippolito, Giovanni Rezza

Abstract

In the last decades, several viruses emerged, as the consequence of cross-species passage from animal reservoirs to human being. Emerging infections always represent a significant challenge for public health system as knowledge about specific pathogens are generally little while and no/few effective interventions are available. In this volume we explored special aspects of emerging infectious diseases including: the application of the theory of focality of diseases to infective syndrome; the human-animal inter-face focusing on influenza; the role of bats as main reservoir of emerging and novel human pathogens; Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) epidemiology and clinical presentation; immediate impact on human health of the last Zika virus outbreak occurred in Pacific Ocean and the Americas; the role and potential application of animal models for the study of emerging infections, to improve disease knowledge and for developing therapeutic drugs during ongoing outbreak.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,412,387
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,982
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,884
of 309,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#64
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.