↓ Skip to main content

Emerging and Re-emerging Viral Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 135: Syrian Hamsters as a Small Animal Model for Emerging Infectious Diseases: Advances in Immunologic Methods
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Syrian Hamsters as a Small Animal Model for Emerging Infectious Diseases: Advances in Immunologic Methods
Chapter number 135
Book title
Emerging and Re-emerging Viral Infections
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_135
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-952484-9, 978-3-31-952485-6
Authors

Bryce M. Warner, David Safronetz, Gary P. Kobinger, Warner, Bryce M., Safronetz, David, Kobinger, Gary P.

Abstract

The use of small animal models for the study of infectious disease is critical for understanding disease progression and for developing prophylactic and therapeutic treatment options. For many diseases, Syrian golden hamsters have emerged as an ideal animal model due to their low cost, small size, ease of handling, and ability to accurately reflect disease progression in humans. Despite the increasing use and popularity of hamsters, there remains a lack of available reagents for studying hamster immune responses. Without suitable reagents for assessing immune responses, researchers are left to examine clinical signs and disease pathology. This becomes an issue for the development of vaccine and treatment options where characterizing the type of immune response generated is critical for understanding protection from disease. Despite the relative lack of reagents for use in hamsters, significant advances have been made recently with several hamster specific immunologic methods being developed. Here we discuss the progress of this development, with focus on classical methods used as well as more recent molecular methods. We outline what methods are currently available for use in hamsters and what is readily used as well as what limitations still exist and future perspectives of reagent and assay development for hamsters. This will provide valuable information to researchers who are deciding whether to use hamsters as an animal model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#4,308
of 5,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,101
of 402,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#344
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.