↓ Skip to main content

Genotyping

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Genotyping'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Genetic Fingerprinting Using Microsatellite Markers in a Multiplex PCR Reaction: A Compilation of Methodological Approaches from Primer Design to Detection Systems
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Genotyping DNA Variants with High-Resolution Melting Analysis
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 High-Throughput Genotyping with TaqMan Allelic Discrimination and Allele-Specific Genotyping Assays
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 In Situ Single-Molecule RNA Genotyping Using Padlock Probes and Rolling Circle Amplification
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The MassARRAY® System for Targeted SNP Genotyping
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Genotyping
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Genotyping
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analysis of Copy Number Variation Using the Paralogue Ratio Test (PRT)
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genotyping Multiallelic Copy Number Variation with Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Analysis of Multiallelic CNVs by Emulsion Haplotype Fusion PCR
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Quantitative DNA Analysis Using Droplet Digital PCR
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Full-Length Mitochondrial-DNA Sequencing on the PacBio RSII
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Targeted Locus Amplification and Next-Generation Sequencing
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Genotyping
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Rapid SNP Detection and Genotyping of Bacterial Pathogens by Pyrosequencing
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Methods for Genotyping-by-Sequencing
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Describing Sequence Variants Using HGVS Nomenclature
Attention for Chapter 6: Genotyping
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
9 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Genotyping
Chapter number 6
Book title
Genotyping
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6442-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6440-6, 978-1-4939-6442-0
Authors

Cantsilieris, Stuart, Stessman, Holly A, Shendure, Jay, Eichler, Evan E, Stuart Cantsilieris, Holly A. Stessman, Jay Shendure, Evan E. Eichler, Stessman, Holly A., Eichler, Evan E.

Abstract

Molecular inversion probes (MIPs) in combination with massively parallel DNA sequencing represent a versatile, yet economical tool for targeted sequencing of genomic DNA. Several thousand genomic targets can be selectively captured using long oligonucleotides containing unique targeting arms and universal linkers. The ability to append sequencing adaptors and sample-specific barcodes allows large-scale pooling and subsequent high-throughput sequencing at relatively low cost per sample. Here, we describe a "wet bench" protocol detailing the capture and subsequent sequencing of >2000 genomic targets from 192 samples, representative of a single lane on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,721,358
of 31,393,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#440
of 16,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,636
of 438,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#62
of 1,127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,393,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.